<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Public foreign currency borrowing is a common problem of emerging markets. Scholars named it the original sin of foreign debt. It has a proven negative influence on economic growth and development, undermining financial stability, and increasing the probability of monetary crises. The roots of the original sin often lay in emerging markets’ institutional underdevelopment, with low-quality monetary policy, inappropriate exchange rate regime choice, and exchange rate mismanagement being stated among the most important causes. This paper evaluates the influence of the exchange rate policy on the emission of foreign currency sovereign bonds in emerging markets. The relationship is estimated using panel data and GMM approach, with exchange rate regime type (both <italic>de jure</italic> and <italic>de facto</italic>) and real exchange rate volatility serving as explanatory variables. The findings reveal that fixed exchange rate regime and high real exchange rate volatility is promoting the foreign currency borrowing. Thus countries that want to reduce the burden of the original sin should lean towards a more flexible exchange rate policy while maintaining their real exchange rate stable.</abstract>

Relationships between exchange rate regime, real exchange rate volatility and currency structure of government bonds in emerging markets

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This study investigates the determinants of private sector investments in Turkey with a focus on democracy. Using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach and two different democracy indices along with the other determinants of private investment, we estimated a private investment function for the 1975-2014 period. Our main finding is that democracy has a profound positive impact on private investment. Moreover, the results show that: (i) public investment is a substitute to private investment; (ii) macroeconomic instability dissuades private investment; (iii) real interest is a serious impediment to private investment; (iv) financial development and GDP growth rate stimulate private investment.</abstract>

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics

Determinants of private investments in Turkey: Examining the role of democracy

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">We provide an overview of housing privatization policies and outcomes in transition economies. Our primary aim is to collect and systematize key information concerning the institutional features of housing privatization in individual countries: we identify the initial conditions, the timeframe of housing privatization and its culmination, the extent of housing privatization, who decided about its terms and conditions, who was entitled to privatize the housing, and at what price. Furthermore, using micro-data covering all transition countries, we present new estimates of the extent of housing privatization, its dynamics during the second half of the 2000s, and the resulting housing tenure structure.</abstract>

Housing Privatization in Transition Countries: Institutional Features and Outcomes

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The purpose of this research is to examine the economic freedom (EF) along with its macroeconomic determinants impact on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflow in South Asia, East Asia, Latin America, Middle East, and North Africa, Northern Europe, Southern Europe, Western Europe, Eastern Europe and Sub Saharan Africa. We use Heritage Foundation economic freedom index data over the period of 1999 to 2018 and employ the stepwise multi regression on variables of business freedom, government spending, tax burden, government integrity, property rights, investment freedom, trade freedom and monetary freedom. The results show that EF has a significant positive impact in South Asia, Latin America, East Asia, North Europe and West Europe. However, for the Middle East and North Africa, East European and South European economies EF has an insignificant influence on FDI inflow.</abstract>

Institute of Regional and Agrarian Economics

Economic Freedom and its Impact on Foreign Direct Investment: Global Overview

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">We introduce “fair” wages in a general-equilibrium model where worker’s effort is unobservable and investigate whether such a mechanism can quantitatively account for the degree of real wage rigidity in the Bulgarian labor markets, as documented in Lozev, Vladova, and Paskaleva (2011) and Paskaleva (2016). In contrast to Danthine and Kurmann (2004), we internalize the effect that past wages have on the current effort level. We calibrate the model to Bulgarian data (1999-2016), and quantify the effect of technological shocks on hours and wages in the theoretical setup. Overall, the calibrated model with “fair” wages performs poorly when it comes to the relative volatilities of labor market variables. This is because aggregate labor market conditions, as proxied by the employment rate and past aggregate wages, turn out not to be quantitatively important for business cycles in Bulgaria.</abstract>

Are “fair” wages quantitatively important for business cycle fluctuations in Bulgaria?

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 24 (2024): Issue 1 (March 2024)

Volume 23 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)

Volume 23 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)

Volume 23 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)

Volume 23 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)

Volume 22 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)

Volume 22 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)

Volume 22 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)

Volume 22 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)

Volume 21 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)

Volume 21 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)

Volume 21 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)

Volume 21 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)

Volume 20 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 20 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)

Volume 20 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)

Volume 20 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 19 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

Volume 19 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)

Volume 19 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)

Volume 19 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 18 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 18 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)

Volume 18 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)

Volume 18 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 17 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 17 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)

Volume 17 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)

Volume 17 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 16 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)

Volume 16 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)

Volume 16 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)

Volume 16 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 15 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 15 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)

Volume 15 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)

Volume 15 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 14 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)

Volume 14 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)

Volume 14 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)

Volume 14 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 13 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)

Volume 13 (2013): Issue 3 (September 2013)

Volume 13 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)

Volume 13 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)

Volume 12 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)

Volume 12 (2012): Issue 3 (October 2012)

Volume 12 (2012): Issue 2 (January 2012)

Volume 12 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)

Volume 11 (2011): Issue 4 (December 2011)

Volume 11 (2011): Issue 3 (September 2011)

Volume 11 (2011): Issue 2 (June 2011)

Volume 11 (2011): Issue 1 (January 2011)

Volume 10 (2010): Issue 4 (December 2010)

Volume 10 (2010): Issue 3 (September 2010)

Volume 10 (2010): Issue 2 (January 2010)

Volume 10 (2010): Issue 1 (January 2010)

Volume 9 (2009): Issue 4 (January 2009)

Volume 9 (2009): Issue 3 (September 2009)

Volume 9 (2009): Issue 2 (January 2009)

Review of Economic Perspectives

 Review of Economic Perspectives (REP) – Národohospodářský obzor (in Czech) is a peer-reviewed scientific quarterly focused on issues in economic policy, economics and econometrics that have practical relevance for Central and Eastern European countries. The articles are published in English, in print and online versions. The journal has freely continued the tradition of Obzor národohospodářský, a Czech economic journal, first issue of which was published in 1895.  Why submit    Free of charge submission and no publication fees  Fast review and editing process  High quality of editing and language revision services by native speaker   Beyond scientific articles REP welcomes and publishes also other works related to its aim like    Reports from important scientific conferences and workshops  Book reviews    Rejection Rate    42 % (2012–2015 average)   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 