[Andersen, S.M. & Chen, S. (2002). Th e relational self: An interpersonal socialcognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109 (4), 619-645.10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.619]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakhtin, M.M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (edited and translated by C. Emerson). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/j.ctt22727z1]Search in Google Scholar
[Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality (2nd edition, pp. 154-196). New York: Guilford Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bargh, J.A. (1994). Th e four horsemen of automaticity. Awareness, intention, effi ciency and control in social cognition. In R.S. Wyer & T.K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition. Vol. 1 (pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bargh, J.A. (1997). Th e automaticity of everyday life. In R.S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Th e Automaticity of Everyday Life: Advances in Social Cognition. Vol. 10 (pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bargh, J.A. (2006). Social Psychology and the Unconscious: Th e Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bąk, W. (2009). Wielość ja w ujęciu poznawczym i dialogowym: Proba integracji podejść [Inner multiplicity from cognitive and dialogical perspectives. An att empt at integration]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 52 (1), 53-68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). Th e Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and Th inking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology (2nd ed. revised). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, M. & Bargh, J. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confi rmation processes: Th e self-fulfi lling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33 (5), 541-560.10.1006/jesp.1997.1329]Search in Google Scholar
[Cervone, D. (2004). Th e architecture of personality. Psychological Review, 111 (1), 183-204.10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.183]Search in Google Scholar
[Cervone, D., Caldwell, T.L., Fiori, M., Orom, H., Shadel, W.G., Kassel, J.D., & Artistice, D. (2008). What underlines appraisals? Experimentally testing a Knowledge-and-Appraisal Model of personality architecture among smokers contemplating high-risk situations. Journal of Personality, 76 (4), 929-967.10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00510.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), Th e Adapted Mind. Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (pp. 163-228). New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1994). Origins of domain-specifi city. Th e evolution of functional organization. In L.A. Hirschfeld & S.A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the Mind. Domain Specifi city in Cognition and Culture (pp. 85-116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dimaggio, G. & Stiles, W.B. (2007). Psychotherapy in light of internal multiplicity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63 (2), 119-127.10.1002/jclp.20335]Search in Google Scholar
[Edwards, D. & Pott er, J. (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Epstein S. (1991). Cognitive-experiential self theory: An integrative theory of personality In R. Curtis (Ed.), Th e Relational Self. Th eoretical Convergences in Psychoanalysis and Social Psychology. New York: Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, J.A. (1983). Th e Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, J.A. (2000). Th e Mind Doesn’t Work Th at Way: Th e Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4627.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Forgas, J.P. (1981). Social Cognition: Perspectives on Everyday Understanding. London: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Forgas, J.P. & Williams, K.D. (2002). Th e Social Self. New York: Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gazzaniga, M.S. & LeDoux, J.E. (1978). Th e Integrated Mind. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-2206-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Gergen, K.J. (1991). Th e Saturated Self. Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenwald, A.G. (1982). Is anyone in charge? Personalysis vs. the principle of personal unity. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self. Vol. 1 (pp. 151-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenwald, A.G. (1988). Self-knowledge and self-deception. In J.S. Lockard & D.L. Paulhus (Ed.), Self-Deception: An Adaptive Mechanism? (pp. 113-131). Englewood Cliff s, NJ: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenwald, A.G. & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Att itudes, selfesteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102 (1), 4-27.10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenwald, A.G. & Pratkanis, A.R. (1984). The self. In R.S. Wyer & T.K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition (pp. 129-178). Hillsdale, New York: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hardin C.D. & Higgins E.T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verifi cation makes the subjective objective. In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition. Vol. 3: Th e Interpersonal Context (pp. 28-84). New York: Guilford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harre, R. & Gillett , G. (1994). Th e Discursive Mind. London: Sage.10.4135/9781452243788]Search in Google Scholar
[Harre, R. & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning Th eory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell. Hermans, H.J.M. (1996). Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin, 19 (1), 31-50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermans, H.J.M. (1999). Th e polyphony of the mind: A multivoiced and dialogical self. In J. Rowan & M. Cooper (Eds.), Th e Plural Self. Multiplicity in Everyday Life (pp. 107-131). London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermans, H.J.M. (2001). Conceptions of self and identity: Toward a dialogical view. International Journal of Education and Religion, 2 (1), 43-62.10.1163/1570-0623-90000034]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermans, H.J.M. (2003). Th e construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16 (2), 89-130.10.1080/10720530390117902]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermans, H.J.M. (2004). Th e dialogical self: Between exchange and power. In H.J.M. Hermans & G. Dimaggio (Eds.), Th e Dialogical Self in Psychotherapy (pp. 13-28). New York: Brunner-Routlege.10.4324/9780203314616]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermans, H.J.M. (2006). Th e self as a theater of voices: Disorganization and reorganization of position repertoire. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19 (2), 147-169.10.1080/10720530500508779]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermans, H.J.M. & Kempen, H.J.G. (1993). Th e Dialogical Self: Meaning as Movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermans, H.J.M. & Hernans-Jensen, E. (1995). Self-Narratives. Th e Construction of Meaning in Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermans, H.J.M. & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical Self Th eory. Positioning and Counter-Positioning in a Globalizing Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511712142]Search in Google Scholar
[Higgins, E.T. (2000). Social cognition: Learning about what matt ers in the social world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30 (1), 3-39.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200001/02)30:1<3::AID-EJSP987>3.0.CO;2-I]Search in Google Scholar
[Jost, J.T. & Kruglanski, A.W. (2002). Th e estrangement of social constructionism and experimental social psychology: history of the rift and prospects for reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6 (3), 168-188.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Kruglanski, A.W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 493-520). New York: Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (2), 63-78.10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63]Search in Google Scholar
[Minsky, M. (1985). Th e Society of Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moskowitz, G.B. (2005). Social Cognition: Understanding Self and Others. Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowak, A., Vallacher, R.R., Tesser, A., & Borkowski, W. (2000). Society of self: Th e emergence of collective properties of self-Structure. Psychological Review, 107 (1), 39-61.10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.39]Search in Google Scholar
[Pervin, L.A. & John, O.P. (2001). Personality: Th eory and Research. 8th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stemplewska-Żakowicz, K. (2001). Umysł dyskursywny. Propozycje teoretyczne podejścia dyskursywnego w psychologii [Th e discursive mind. Th eoretical proposals of the discursive approach in psychology]. In I. Kurcz & J. Bobryk (Eds.), Psychologiczne studia nad językiem i dyskursem [Psychological Studies on Language and Discourse] (pp. 195-228). Warsaw: PAN Psychology Institute Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stemplewska-Żakowicz, K. (2004). O rzeczach widywanych na obrazkach i opowiadanych o nich historiach. TAT jako metoda badawcza i diagnostyczna [On Th ings which Have Been Seen in Pictures and Stories which Have Been Told about Th em. Th e Th ematic Apperception Test as a Research and Diagnostic Method]. Warsaw: Academica.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stemplewska-Żakowicz, K., Suszek, H., Kobylińska, D., & Szymczyk, B. (2010). Explorations in the discursive mind. Th eoretical model. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 4 (1), 81-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stemplewska-Żakowicz, K., Zalewski, B., Suszek, H., Fira-Krempa, E., & Kobylińska, D. (2009). Relacyjnie strukturalizowany umysł. Model Teoretyczny [Relationally structured mind. A theoretical model]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 52 (1), 69-85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stemplewska-Żakowicz, K., Zalewski, B., Suszek, H., & Kobylińska, D. (2012). Cognitive architecture of the dialogical mind: An experimental approach. In H.J.M. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook on the Dialogical Self (pp. 264-283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suszek, H., Kobylińska, D., Stemplewska-Żakowicz, K., & Szymczyk, B. (2010). Explorations in the discursive mind. Research. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 4 (1), 95-122.]Search in Google Scholar
[Underwood, G. (1996). Implicit Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Dijk, T.A. (1989). Social cognition and discourse. In H. Giles & R.P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology and Language (pp. 163-183). Chichester: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Dijk, T.A. (1997). Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Dijk, T.A. (2007). Th e study of discourse: An introduction. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse Studies. 5 Vols. (Sage Benchmark Series, pp. xix-xiii). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446261415]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511481499]Search in Google Scholar
[Vygotsky, L.S. (1982). Th ought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the Mind. A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard. ]Search in Google Scholar
