Overview of construction simulation approaches to model construction processes

AbouRizk, S., Halpin, D., Mohamed, Y., & Hermann, U. (2011). Research in modeling and simulation for improving construction engineering operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(10), pp. 843–852.AbouRizkS.HalpinD.MohamedY.HermannU.2011Research in modeling and simulation for improving construction engineering operationsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management1371084385210.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000288Search in Google Scholar

AbouRizk, S. M. (2010). Role of simulation in construction engineering and management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(10), pp. 1140–1153.AbouRizkS. M.2010Role of simulation in construction engineering and managementJournal of Construction Engineering and Management136101140115310.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000220Search in Google Scholar

AbouRizk, S. M., & Halpin, D. W. (1992). Statistical properties of construction duration data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(3), pp. 525–544.AbouRizkS. M.HalpinD. W.1992Statistical properties of construction duration dataJournal of Construction Engineering and Management118352554410.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:3(525)Search in Google Scholar

AbouRizk, S. M., & Sawhney, A. (1993). Subjective and interactive duration estimation. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 20, pp. 457–470.AbouRizkS. M.SawhneyA.1993Subjective and interactive duration estimationCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering2045747010.1139/l93-060Search in Google Scholar

Alvanchi, A., Lee, S. H., & AbouRizk, S. (2011). Modeling framework and architecture of hybrid system dynamics and discrete event simulation for construction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26(2), pp. 77–91.AlvanchiA.LeeS. H.AbouRizkS.2011Modeling framework and architecture of hybrid system dynamics and discrete event simulation for constructionComputer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering262779110.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00650.xSearch in Google Scholar

Alzraiee, H., Zayed, T., & Moselhi, O. (2012). Methodology for synchronizing discrete event simulation and system dynamics models. In: Laroque, C., Himmelspach, J., Pasupathy, R., Rose, O., & Uhrmacher, A. M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). IEEE, Berlin, Germany, pp. 1–11.AlzraieeH.ZayedT.MoselhiO.2012Methodology for synchronizing discrete event simulation and system dynamics modelsIn:LaroqueC.HimmelspachJ.PasupathyR.RoseO.UhrmacherA. M.(eds.)Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)IEEEBerlin, Germany11110.1109/WSC.2012.6464997Search in Google Scholar

Alzraiee, H., Zayed, T., & Moselhi, O. (2015). Dynamic planning of construction activities using hybrid simulation. Automation in Construction, 49, pp. 176–192.AlzraieeH.ZayedT.MoselhiO.2015Dynamic planning of construction activities using hybrid simulationAutomation in Construction4917619210.22260/ISARC2013/0049Search in Google Scholar

Ayyub, B. M., & Haldar, A. (1984). Project scheduling using fuzzy set concepts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 110(2), pp. 189–204.AyyubB. M.HaldarA.1984Project scheduling using fuzzy set conceptsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management110218920410.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1984)110:2(189)Search in Google Scholar

Balaban, M., Hester, P., & Diallo, S. (2014). Towards a theory of multi-method M&S approach: Part I. In: Tolk, A., Diallo, S. Y., Ryzhov, I. O., Yilmaz, L., Buckley, S., & Miller, J. A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Savannah, GA, USA, pp. 1652–1663.BalabanM.HesterP.DialloS.2014Towards a theory of multi-method M&S approach: Part IIn:TolkA.DialloS. Y.RyzhovI. O.YilmazL.BuckleyS.MillerJ. A.(eds.)Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simulation ConferenceIEEESavannah, GA, USA1652166310.1109/WSC.2014.7020016Search in Google Scholar

Borshchev, A. (2013). Multi-method modeling. In: Pasupathy, R., Kim, S. -H., Tolk, A., Hill, R., & Kuhl, M. E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Washington DC, USA, pp. 4089–4100. Available at https://informs-sim.org/wsc13papers/includes/files/410.pdf.BorshchevA.2013Multi-method modelingIn:PasupathyR.KimS. -H.TolkA.HillR.KuhlM. E.(eds.)Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation ConferenceIEEEWashington DC, USA40894100Available at https://informs-sim.org/wsc13papers/includes/files/410.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Borshchev, A., & Filippov, A. (2004). From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling : reasons, techniques, tools. In: Kennedy, M., Winch, G. W., Langer, R. S., Rowe, J. I., & Yanni, J. M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. System Dynamics Society, Oxford, UK. Available at: http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/systemdyndiscreteeventabm-compared.borshchevfilippov04.pdf.BorshchevA.FilippovA.2004From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling : reasons, techniques, toolsIn:KennedyM.WinchG. W.LangerR. S.RoweJ. I.YanniJ. M.(eds.)Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics SocietySystem Dynamics SocietyOxford, UKAvailable at: http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/systemdyndiscreteeventabm-compared.borshchevfilippov04.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Dabirian, S., Khanzadi, M., & Moussazadeh, M. (2016). Predicting labor costs in construction projects using agent-based modeling and simulation. Scientia Iranica, 23(1), pp. 91–101.DabirianS.KhanzadiM.MoussazadehM.2016Predicting labor costs in construction projects using agent-based modeling and simulationScientia Iranica2319110110.24200/sci.2016.2100Search in Google Scholar

Dawood, N., Hobbs, B., & Fanning, A. (2001). Standardization of brickwork construction: identification and measurement of standard processes. In: Akintoye, A. (ed.) Proceedings 17th Annual ARCOM Conference. ARCOM, Salford, UK, pp. 321–329. Available at http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2001-321-329_Dawood_Hobbs_and_Fanning.pdf.DawoodN.HobbsB.FanningA.2001Standardization of brickwork construction: identification and measurement of standard processesIn:AkintoyeA.(ed.)Proceedings 17th Annual ARCOM ConferenceARCOMSalford, UK321329Available at http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2001-321-329_Dawood_Hobbs_and_Fanning.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

De Salles, D. C., Gonçalves Neto, A. C., & Marujo, L. G. (2016). Using fuzzy logic to implement decision policies in system dynamics models. Expert Systems with Applications, 55, pp. 172–183.De SallesD. C.Gonçalves NetoA. C.MarujoL. G.2016Using fuzzy logic to implement decision policies in system dynamics modelsExpert Systems with Applications5517218310.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.048Search in Google Scholar

Fahrland, D. A. (1970). Combined discrete event continuous systems simulation. Simulation, 14(2), pp. 61–72.FahrlandD. A.1970Combined discrete event continuous systems simulationSimulation142617210.1177/003754977001400203Search in Google Scholar

Florez, L. (2017). Crew allocation system for the masonry industry. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 32(10), pp. 874–889.FlorezL.2017Crew allocation system for the masonry industryComputer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering321087488910.1111/mice.12301Search in Google Scholar

Florez, L., & Castro-Lacouture, D. (2014). Labor management in masonry construction: a sustainable approach. In: 31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining (ISARC 2014): Automation, Construction and Environment. International Association for Automation & Robotics in Construction (IAARC), Sydney, Australia, pp. 529–536.FlorezL.Castro-LacoutureD.2014Labor management in masonry construction: a sustainable approachIn:31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining (ISARC 2014): Automation, Construction and EnvironmentInternational Association for Automation & Robotics in Construction (IAARC)Sydney, Australia52953610.22260/ISARC2014/0071Search in Google Scholar

Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Productivity Press, Portland, Oregon.ForresterJ. W.1961Industrial dynamicsProductivity PressPortland, OregonSearch in Google Scholar

Gordon, G. (1961). A general purpose systems simulation program. In: Proceedings of the December 12–14, 1961, Eastern Joint Computer Conference: Computers - Key to Total Systems Control - AFIPS ’61 (Eastern). ACM Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 87–104.GordonG.1961A general purpose systems simulation programIn:Proceedings of the December 12–14, 1961, Eastern Joint Computer Conference: Computers - Key to Total Systems Control - AFIPS ’61 (Eastern)ACM PressWashington, DC, USA8710410.1145/1460764.1460768Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, M., & Bokor, O. (2016). Sensitivity analysis in PERT networks: Does activity duration distribution matter? Automation in Construction, 65, pp. 1–8.HajduM.BokorO.2016Sensitivity analysis in PERT networks: Does activity duration distribution matter?Automation in Construction651810.1016/j.autcon.2016.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Hsu, S. C., Weng, K. W., Cui, Q., & Rand, W. (2016). Understanding the complexity of project team member selection through agent-based modeling. International Journal of Project Management, 34(1), pp. 82–93.HsuS. C.WengK. W.CuiQ.RandW.2016Understanding the complexity of project team member selection through agent-based modelingInternational Journal of Project Management341829310.1016/j.ijproman.2015.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Khanzadi, M., Nasirzadeh, F., & Alipour, M. (2012). Integrating system dynamics and fuzzy logic modeling to determine concession period in BOT projects. Automation in Construction, 22, pp. 368–376.KhanzadiM.NasirzadehF.AlipourM.2012Integrating system dynamics and fuzzy logic modeling to determine concession period in BOT projectsAutomation in Construction2236837610.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.015Search in Google Scholar

Khanzadi, M., Nasirzadeh, F., Mir, M., & Nojedehi, P. (2017). Prediction and improvement of labor productivity using hybrid system dynamics and agent-based modeling approach. Construction Innovation, 18(1), pp. 2–19.KhanzadiM.NasirzadehF.MirM.NojedehiP.2017Prediction and improvement of labor productivity using hybrid system dynamics and agent-based modeling approachConstruction Innovation18121910.1108/CI-06-2015-0034Search in Google Scholar

Kunc, M. (2017). System dynamics: a soft and hard approach to modelling. In: Chan, W. K. V., D’Ambrogio, A., Zacharewicz, G., Mustafee, N., Wainer, G., & Page, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 597–606.KuncM.2017System dynamics: a soft and hard approach to modellingIn:ChanW. K. V.D’AmbrogioA.ZacharewiczG.MustafeeN.WainerG.PageE.(eds.)Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation ConferenceIEEELas Vegas, NV, USA59760610.1109/WSC.2017.8247818Search in Google Scholar

Lättilä, L., Hilletofth, P., & Lin, B. (2010). Hybrid simulation models - When, why, how? Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), pp. 7969–7975.LättiläL.HilletofthP.LinB.2010Hybrid simulation models - When, why, how?Expert Systems with Applications37127969797510.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.039Search in Google Scholar

Law, A. M. (2015). Simulation Modeling and Analysis. 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.LawA. M.2015Simulation Modeling and Analysis5th ednMcGraw-HillNew YorkSearch in Google Scholar

Lorterapong, P., & Moselhi, O. (1996). Project-network analysis using fuzzy sets theory. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(4), pp. 308–318.LorterapongP.MoselhiO.1996Project-network analysis using fuzzy sets theoryJournal of Construction Engineering and Management122430831810.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:4(308)Search in Google Scholar

Martinez, J. C. (2010). Methodology for conducting discrete-event simulation studies in construction engineering and management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(1), pp. 3–16.MartinezJ. C.2010Methodology for conducting discrete-event simulation studies in construction engineering and managementJournal of Construction Engineering and Management136131610.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000087Search in Google Scholar

Mawdesley, M. J., & Al-Jibouri, S. (2009). Modelling construction project productivity using systems dynamics approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(1), pp. 18–36.MawdesleyM. J.Al-JibouriS.2009Modelling construction project productivity using systems dynamics approachInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management591183610.1108/17410401011006095Search in Google Scholar

Moradi, S., Nasirzadeh, F., & Golkhoo, F. (2015). A hybrid SD–DES simulation approach to model construction projects. Construction Innovation, 15(1), pp. 66–83.MoradiS.NasirzadehF.GolkhooF.2015A hybrid SD–DES simulation approach to model construction projectsConstruction Innovation151668310.1108/CI-10-2013-0045Search in Google Scholar

Mosterman, P. J. (1999). An overview of hybrid simulation phenomena and their support by simulation packages. In: Vaandrager, F. W., & van Schuppen, J. H. (eds.) Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control. Springer, Berg en Dal, The Netherlands, pp. 165–177.MostermanP. J.1999An overview of hybrid simulation phenomena and their support by simulation packagesIn:VaandragerF. W.van SchuppenJ. H.(eds.)Hybrid Systems: Computation and ControlSpringerBerg en Dal, The Netherlands16517710.1007/3-540-48983-5_17Search in Google Scholar

Mustafee, N., Powell, J., Brailsford, S. C., Diallo, S., Padilla, J., & Tolk, A. (2015). Hybrid simulation studies and hybrid simulation systems: definitions, challenges, and benefits. In: Yilmaz, L., Chan, W. K. V., Moon, I., Roeder, T. M. K., Macal, C., & Rossetti, M. D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Huntington Beach, CA, USA, pp. 1678–1692.MustafeeN.PowellJ.BrailsfordS. C.DialloS.PadillaJ.TolkA.2015Hybrid simulation studies and hybrid simulation systems: definitions, challenges, and benefitsIn:YilmazL.ChanW. K. V.MoonI.RoederT. M. K.MacalC.RossettiM. D.(eds.)Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation ConferenceIEEEHuntington Beach, CA, USA1678169210.1109/WSC.2015.7408287Search in Google Scholar

Nasirzadeh, F., Khanzadi, M., & Mir, M. (2018). A hybrid simulation framework for modelling construction projects using agent-based modelling and system dynamics: an application to model construction workers’ safety behavior. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(2), pp. 132–143.NasirzadehF.KhanzadiM.MirM.2018A hybrid simulation framework for modelling construction projects using agent-based modelling and system dynamics: an application to model construction workers’ safety behaviorInternational Journal of Construction Management18213214310.1080/15623599.2017.1285485Search in Google Scholar

Nojedehi, P., & Nasirzadeh, F. (2017). A hybrid simulation approach to model and improve construction labor productivity. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(5), pp. 1516–1524.NojedehiP.NasirzadehF.2017A hybrid simulation approach to model and improve construction labor productivityKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering2151516152410.1007/s12205-016-0278-ySearch in Google Scholar

Peña-Mora, F., Han, S., Lee, S., & Park, M. (2008). Strategic-operational construction management: hybrid system dynamics and discrete event approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(9), pp. 701–710.Peña-MoraF.HanS.LeeS.ParkM.2008Strategic-operational construction management: hybrid system dynamics and discrete event approachJournal of Construction Engineering and Management134970171010.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:9(701)Search in Google Scholar

Raoufi, M., & Robinson Fayek, A. (2015). Integrating Fuzzy logic and agent-based modeling for assessing construction crew behavior. In: Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS. IEEE, Redmond, WA, USA.RaoufiM.Robinson FayekA.2015Integrating Fuzzy logic and agent-based modeling for assessing construction crew behaviorIn:Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPSIEEERedmond, WA, USA10.1109/NAFIPS-WConSC.2015.7284151Search in Google Scholar

Raoufi, M., Seresht, N. G., & Robinson Fayek, A. (2016). Overview of Fuzzy simulation techniques in construction engineering and management. In Ceberio, M., & Kreinovich, V. (eds.) 2016 Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS). IEEE, El Paso, TX, USA, pp. 1–6.RaoufiM.SereshtN. G.Robinson FayekA.2016Overview of Fuzzy simulation techniques in construction engineering and managementInCeberioM.KreinovichV.(eds.)2016 Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS)IEEEEl Paso, TX, USA1610.1109/NAFIPS.2016.7851610Search in Google Scholar

Robinson Fayek, A., & Oduba, A. (2005). Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using Fuzzy expert systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(8), pp. 938–941.Robinson FayekA.OdubaA.2005Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using Fuzzy expert systemsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management131893894110.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:8(938)Search in Google Scholar

Sargent, R. G. (2015). An introductory tutorial on verification and validation of simulation models. In: Yilmaz, L., Chan, W. K. V., Moon, I., Roeder, T. M. K., Macal, C., & Rossetti, M. D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Huntington Beach, CA, USA, pp. 1729–1740.SargentR. G.2015An introductory tutorial on verification and validation of simulation modelsIn:YilmazL.ChanW. K. V.MoonI.RoederT. M. K.MacalC.RossettiM. D.(eds.)Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation ConferenceIEEEHuntington Beach, CA, USA1729174010.1109/WSC.2015.7408291Search in Google Scholar

Sawhney, A., Bashford, H., Walsh, K., & Mulky, A. R. (2003). Agent-based modeling and simulation in construction. In: Chick, S., Sánchez, P. J., Ferrin, D., & Morrice, D. J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 1541–1547.SawhneyA.BashfordH.WalshK.MulkyA. R.2003Agent-based modeling and simulation in constructionIn:ChickS.SánchezP. J.FerrinD.MorriceD. J.(eds.)Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation ConferenceIEEENew Orleans, LA, USA1541154710.1109/WSC.2003.1261600Search in Google Scholar

Shaheen, A. A., Robinson Fayek, A., & AbouRizk, S. M. (2009). Methodology for integrating fuzzy expert systems and discrete event simulation in construction engineering. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 36(9), pp. 1478–1490.ShaheenA. A.Robinson FayekA.AbouRizkS. M.2009Methodology for integrating fuzzy expert systems and discrete event simulation in construction engineeringCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering3691478149010.1139/L09-091Search in Google Scholar

Siebers, P. O., MacAl, C. M., Garnett, J., Buxton, D., & Pidd, M. (2010). Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation! Journal of Simulation, 4(3), pp. 204–210.SiebersP. O.MacAlC. M.GarnettJ.BuxtonD.PiddM.2010Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation!Journal of Simulation4320421010.1057/jos.2010.14Search in Google Scholar

Son, J. W., Rojas, E. M., & Shin, S.-W. (2015). Application of agent-based modeling and simulation to understanding complex management problems in CEM research. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(8), pp. 998–1013.SonJ. W.RojasE. M.ShinS.-W.2015Application of agent-based modeling and simulation to understanding complex management problems in CEM researchJournal of Civil Engineering and Management218998101310.3846/13923730.2014.893916Search in Google Scholar

Swinerd, C., & McNaught, K. R. (2012). Design classes for hybrid simulations involving agent-based and system dynamics models. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 25, pp. 118–133.SwinerdC.McNaughtK. R.2012Design classes for hybrid simulations involving agent-based and system dynamics modelsSimulation Modelling Practice and Theory2511813310.1016/j.simpat.2011.09.002Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, H. R., Završki, I. (1999). Construction baseline productivity: theory and practice. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(5), pp. 295–303.ThomasH. R.ZavrškiI.1999Construction baseline productivity: theory and practiceJournal of Construction Engineering and Management125529530310.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:5(295)Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, M., Mukherjee, A., Onder, N., & Mattila, K. (2009). Using agent-based modeling to study construction labor productivity as an emergent property of individual and crew interactions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), pp. 657–667.WatkinsM.MukherjeeA.OnderN.MattilaK.2009Using agent-based modeling to study construction labor productivity as an emergent property of individual and crew interactionsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management135765766710.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000022Search in Google Scholar

Zadeh, L. A. (1980). Fuzzy sets versus probability. Proceedings of the IEEE, 68(3), p. 421.ZadehL. A.1980Fuzzy sets versus probabilityProceedings of the IEEE68342110.1109/PROC.1980.11659Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Tam, C. M., & Li, H. (2005). Modeling uncertain activity duration by fuzzy number and discrete-event simulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 164, pp. 715–729.ZhangH.TamC. M.LiH.2005Modeling uncertain activity duration by fuzzy number and discrete-event simulationEuropean Journal of Operational Research16471572910.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.035Search in Google Scholar