[Bileišis, M. and P. Kovač. 2017. “Conclusion: Main Themes of Public Administration Reforms in the Eastern EU Member States.” In Bileišis, M., Kovač, P. (eds.). Public Administration Reforms in Eastern European Union Member States: Post-Accession Convergence and Divergence. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration / Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University, 471 – 494.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bouckaert, G., J. Nemec, V. Nakrošis, G. Hajnal and K. Tõnnisson. 2008. Public Management Reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chum, J. 2015. “Demytizace státní služby: Hledat nové symboly prestiže.” Veřejná správa 8, 15 – 17.]Search in Google Scholar
[EUROPEAID. 2015. Evaluation of PHARE Financial Assistance to Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. Finale Report published on 19 January 2015. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/fi-nancial_assistance/phare/evaluation/2015/20150806-phare-ex-post-evaluation-final-report.pdf (last accessed 16 January 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hendrych, D. et al. 1996. Správní právo (Obecná část). Praha: C. H. BECK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hesse, J. J. 1998. “Rebuilding the State: Administrative Reform in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Preparing Public Administrations for the European Administrative Space. Sigma Paper 23, 168 – 179. Available at https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5kml6143zd8p-en.pdf?expires=1525927234&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=8362DF08495FA0A1920E4C74C66C78EA (last accessed 16 January 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Korbel, F. et al. 2005. Právo na informace (komentář). Praha: Linde.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuhlmann, S. and H. Wollmann. 2014. Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Edgar.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kužílek, O. and M. Žantovský. 2002. Svoboda informací: Svobodný přístup k informacím v právním řádu České republiky. Praha: Linde.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. 2009. “The Sustainability of Civil Service Reform in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years after Accession.” SIGMA Paper 44. Paris: OECD Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[MHW Consortium. 2007. Phare Ex Post Evaluation. Phase 2, National and CBC Programmes: The Czech Republic. Available at http://aei.pitt.edu/93386/ (last accessed 16 January 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ministerstvo vnitra. 2016a. Dopadová ex-post evaluace strategie realizace Smart administration v období 2007 – 2015 Efektivní veřejná správa a přátelské veřejné služby. Available at http://www.smartadministration.cz/docDetail.aspx?docid=22021463&doctype=ART (last accessed 4 October 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ministerstvo vnitra. 2016b. Analýza využívání metod kvality ve veřejné správě. Available at http://www.mvcr.cz/soubor/analyza-vyuzivani-metod-kvalityve-verejne-sprave-k-sc-1-3.aspx (last accessed 9 October 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ministerstvo vnitra. 2016c. Analýza měření a hodnocení výkonu veřejné správy v ČR. Available at http://www.mvcr.cz/soubor/4-analyza-sc-1-4-hodnoceni-amereni-vykonu-vs-v-cr-f-pdf.aspx (last accessed 9 October 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ministerstvo vnitra. 2017. Systém měření a hodnocení veřejné správy. Available at http://www.mvcr.cz/soubor/mereni-a-hodnoceni-verejne-spravy.aspx (last accessed 9 January 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Národni Vzdělávací Fond. 1998. Analýza veřejné správy České republiky (Souhrnná zpráva). Available at http://www.nvf.cz/archiv/versprava/analyza/obsah.htm (last accessed 10 May 2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, J. 2008. “Public Management Reforms in CEE: Lessons Learned.” In Bouckaert, G., Nemec, J. Nakrosis, V., Hajnal, G., Tonnisson, K. (eds.). Public Management Reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPA, 343 – 371.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, J., G. Bouckaert and V. Nakrosis. 2011. “Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE: Main Trajectories and Results.” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 4(1), 9 – 32.10.2478/v10110-011-0001-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Ochrana, F., M. J. Půček and D. Špaček. 2015. Veřejná správa. Brno: Ekonomickosprávní fakulta.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2001. Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making. Paris, OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2009. Government at a Glance. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pokorná, K. 2016. Dopady zavedení služebního zákona na konkrétní úřad. Master Thesis tutored by D. Špaček. Brno: Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University. Reprinted in Veřejná správa 25 – 26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. 2010. “Promotion of Quality Management in Public Administration: The Approach of Czech Central Government.” Národohospodářský obzor 4, 133 – 150.10.2478/v10135-011-0002-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. 2014. “Coordination of and through E-Government: The Case of the Czech Republic.” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 7(1), 83 – 106.10.2478/nispa-2014-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. 2015a. “E-government Policy and its Implementation in the Czech Republic: Selected Shortcomings.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 9(1), 78 – 100.10.1515/cejpp-2016-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. 2015b. “Quality Management in the Czech Public Administration.” In J. Nemec and M. S. de Vries (eds). Implementation of New Public Management Tools: Experiences from Transition and Emerging Countries. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 285 – 304.]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. 2016. “e-Government Benchmarking: Score vs. Reality (The Case of EU e-gov Benchmarking and Czech e-Government).” Draft paper prepared for the NISPAcee 2016 conference, 19 – 21 May 2016, Zagreb, Croatia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. 2018. Role and Effect of External Support to Public Administration in the Czech Republic, 2018. Task 3 report prepared for the EUPACK project a finalized in February 2018, not published.]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. and J. Nemec. 2017a. Public Administration Characteristics in Czech Republic. Prepared for the EUPACK project and finalized in October 2017, not published.]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. and J. Nemec. 2017b. Report on Public Administration Reform Trends and Reform Dynamics in the Czech Republic. Prepared for the EUPACK project and finalized in October 2017, not published.]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. and J. Neshybová. 2010. “Brief History and Current Trends of Public Administration Reform in the Czech Republic.” In Public Administration in Times of Crisis. Bratislava: NISPAcee. CD Rom (conference proceedings).]Search in Google Scholar
[Špaček, D. 2017, Social media usage and performance: the case of Czech regions. In Innovation Governance in the Public Sector. Bratislava: NISPAcee, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tinholt, D. et al. 2017. eGovernment Benchmark 2017: Taking Stock of User-Centric Design and Delivery of Digital Public Services in Europe. Available at https://www.capgemini.com/consulting/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/11/2017-egovernment-benchmark-insight1.pdf (last accessed 16 February 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Verheijen, T. 1998. “Chapter 1: The Management of EU Affairs in Candidate Member States: Inventory of the Current State of Affairs.” SIGMA Paper 23, 16 – 40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vidláková, O. 2000. Reformy veřejné správy. Pardubice: Univerzita Pardubice. de Vries, M. 2017. “Public Administration Reforms in the EEU – Introduction.” In P. Kovač and M. Bileišis (eds). Public Administration Reforms in Eastern European Union Member States: Post-Accession Convergence and Divergence. Ljubljana: Univesity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration / Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University, 26 – 33.10.24193/tras.2017.0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Zikmunda, M. 2010. Očekávané a reálné přínosy implementace řízení kvality ve veřejné správě. Diploma thesis. Brno: Masaryk University.]Search in Google Scholar
