Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Optimizing Outcome in the University-Industry Technology Transfer Projects


Zitieren

[1] Agrawal. „University-to-Industry Knowledge Transfer: Literature Review and Unanswered Questions”, in International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 3 (4), December 2001, pp. 285-302.10.1111/1468-2370.00069Search in Google Scholar

[2] Agrawal. „Engaging the Inventor: Exploring Licensing Strategies for University Inventions and the Role of Latent Knowledge”, in Strategic Management Journal, vol. 27(1), January 2006, pp. 63-79.10.1002/smj.508Search in Google Scholar

[3] N.S. Argyres and J.P. Liebeskind. „Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology”, in Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 35(4), May 1998, pp. 427-454.10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00049-3Search in Google Scholar

[4] Arora. „Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights and the Market for Know-How”, in Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 4(1), 1995, pp. 41-60.10.1080/10438599500000013Search in Google Scholar

[5] R.L. Beck. „Competition for Patent Monopolies”, in Research in Law and Economics, vol. 3, 1981, pp. 91-100.Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Bessen. „Patents and the Diffusion of Technical Information”, in Economics Letters, vol. 86(1), January 2005, pp. 121-128.10.1016/j.econlet.2004.07.005Search in Google Scholar

[7] D. Blumenthal. „Academic-Industrial Relationships in the Life Sciences”, in New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 349(25), December 2003, pp. 2452-2459.10.1056/NEJMhpr035460Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. Blumenthal et al., „Participation of Life-Science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry”, in New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 335(23), December 1996, pp. 1734-1738.10.1056/NEJM199612053352305Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bozeman. „Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory”, in Research Policy, vol. 29(4-5), April 2000, pp. 627-655.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1Search in Google Scholar

[10] D.L. Burk and B.H. McDonnell. „The Goldilocks Hypothesis: Balancing Intellectual Property Rights at the Boundary of the Firm”, in University of Illinois Law Review, vol. 2007(2), 2007, pp. 575-636.10.2139/ssrn.890944Search in Google Scholar

[11] Burstein and D. Bok. Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education, Princeton University Press, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[12] CFMT, Inc. v. YieldUP Int'l Corp., 349 F.3d 1333, 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2003)Search in Google Scholar

[13] W.M. Cohen and D.A. Levinthal. „Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, in Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35(1), March 1990, pp. 128-152.10.2307/2393553Search in Google Scholar

[14] H.M. Collins. „The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks”, in Science Studies, vol. 4(2), April 1974, pp. 165-185.10.1177/030631277400400203Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ch.A. Cotropia. „The Folly of Early Filing in Patent Law”, in Hastings Law Journal, vol. 61(1), November 2009, pp. 72-82.Search in Google Scholar

[16] R. Cowan and D. Foray. „The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge”, in Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 6(3), February 1997, pp. 595-622.10.1093/icc/6.3.595Search in Google Scholar

[17] Di Gregorio and S. Scott. „Why Do Some Universities Generate More Start-Ups Than Others?” in Research Policy, vol. 32(2), February 2003, pp. 209-227.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5Search in Google Scholar

[18] R.S. Eisenberg. „Academic Freedom and Academic Values in Sponsored Research”, in Texas Law Review, vol. 66, March 1988, pp. 1363-1404.Search in Google Scholar

[19] R.S. Eisenberg. „Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use”, in University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 56, 1989, pp. 1017-1086.10.2307/1599761Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. Feldman et al., „Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities”, in Management Science, vol. 48(1), January 2002, pp. 105-121.10.1287/mnsc.48.1.105.14276Search in Google Scholar

[21] B.M. Frischmann. „Commercializing University Research Systems in Economic Perspective: A View from the Demand Side”, in University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Process, Design, and Intellectual Property, G.D. Libecap, Stamford (CT): JAI Press, pp. 155-186.10.1016/S1048-4736(05)16006-8Search in Google Scholar

[22] J.C. Fromer. „Patent Disclosure”, in Iowa Law Review, vol. 94(2), February 2009, pp. 539-606.Search in Google Scholar

[23] R.J. Gilson et al., „Contracting for Innovation: Vertical Disintegration and Interfirm Collaboration”, in Columbia Law Review, vol. 109(3), April 2009, pp. 431-502.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Gorga and M. Halberstam. „Knowledge Inputs, Legal Institutions, and Firm Structure: Towards a Knowledge Based Theory of the Firm”, in Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 101(3), April 2007, pp. 1123-1144.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Hippel. „Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation”, in ManagementScience, vol. 40(4), April 1994, pp. 429-439.10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429Search in Google Scholar

[26] T.R. Holbrook. „Possession in Patent Law”, in Southern Methodist University Law Review, vol. 59(1), January 2006, pp. 126-131.Search in Google Scholar

[27] J. Howells. „Tacit Knowledge. Innovation and Technology Transfer”, in Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 8(2), June 1996, pp. 91-106.10.1080/09537329608524237Search in Google Scholar

[28] H. Irwin and E. More. „Technology Transfer and Communication: Lessons from Silicon Valley, Route 128, Carolina's Research Triangle and Hi-Tech Texas”, in Journal of Information Science, vol. 17(5), October 1991, pp. 273-280.10.1177/016555159101700503Search in Google Scholar

[29] C. Jansen and H.F. Dillon. „Where Do the Leads for Licenses Come From? Source Data from Six Institutions”, in Industry and Higher Education, vol. 14(3), June 2000, pp. 150-156.10.5367/000000000101294995Search in Google Scholar

[30] R. Jensen and M. Thursby. „Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions”, in American Economic Review, vol. 91(1), March 2001, pp. 240-259.10.1257/aer.91.1.240Search in Google Scholar

[31] M. Kenney. Biotechnology: The University Industrial Complex, New Haven(CT): Yale University Press, 1986.10.2307/j.ctt1ww3vs6Search in Google Scholar

[32] E.W. Kitch. „The Nature and Function of the Patent System”, in Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 20(2), October 1977, pp. 265-290.10.1086/466903Search in Google Scholar

[33] B. Kogut and U. Zander. „Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology”, in Organization Science, vol. 3(3), August 1992, 383-397.10.1287/orsc.3.3.383Search in Google Scholar

[34] Krattiger et al. Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices, MIHR and PIPRA, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[35] L.R. de Larena. „The Price of Progress: Are Universities Adding to the Cost?”, in Houston Law Review, vol. 44, July 2006, pp. 1373-1375.Search in Google Scholar

[36] P. Lee. „Contracting to Preserve Open Science: Consideration- Based Regulation in Patent Law”, in Emory Law Journal, vol. 58(4), October 2009, pp. 889-976.Search in Google Scholar

[37] P. Lee. „Transcending the tacit dimension: Patents, relationships, and organizational integration in technology transfer”, in California Law Review, vol. 100(6), December 2012, pp. 1503-1572.Search in Google Scholar

[38] R.L. Lieberwitz. „The Marketing of Higher Education: The Price of the University's Soul”, in Cornell Law Review, vol. 89, March 2004, pp. 763-800.Search in Google Scholar

[39] K. Lim. „The Many Faces of Absorptive Capacity: Spillovers of Copper Interconnect Technology for Semiconductor Chips”, in Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 18(6), December 2009, pp. 1249-1284.10.1093/icc/dtp044Search in Google Scholar

[40] Lockett et al., „Technology Transfer and Universities' Spin-Out Strategies”, in Small Business Economics, vol. 20(2), March 2003, pp. 185-200.10.1023/A:1022220216972Search in Google Scholar

[41] G.D. Markman et al., „Entrepreneurship and University- Based Technology Transfer”, in Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 20(2), March 2005, pp. 241-263.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003Search in Google Scholar

[42] Marshall. Principles of Economics, 8th ed., London: Macmillan and Co., 1920.Search in Google Scholar

[43] R.P. Merges. „Of Property Rules, Coase, and Intellectual Property”, in Columbia Law Review, vol. 94(8), December 1994, pp. 2655-2673.10.2307/1123152Search in Google Scholar

[44] D.C. Moweryt et al., Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act, Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Murray. „Innovation as Co-evolution of Scientific and Technological Networks: Exploring Tissue Engineering”, in Research Policy, vol. 39(8-9), December 2002, 1389-1403.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00070-7Search in Google Scholar

[46] J.E. Oxley. „Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach”, in Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, vol. 13 (2), 1997, pp. 387-409.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a023389Search in Google Scholar

[47] W.W. Powell. „Inter-organizational Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry”, in Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 152(1), March 1996, pp. 197-215.Search in Google Scholar

[48] J.B. Powers and P.P. McDougall. „University Start-Up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms That Go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship”, in Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 20 (3), May 2005, pp. 291-311.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.008Search in Google Scholar

[49] E. Press and J. Washburn. „The Kept University”, in Atlantic Monthly, vol. 285(3), March 2000, pp. 39-54. Search in Google Scholar

[50] S.B. Seymore. „The Teaching Function of Patents”, in Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 85(2), 2010, pp. 621-669.Search in Google Scholar

[51] T. Sichelman. „Commercializing Patents”, in Stanford Law Review, vol. 62(2), January 2010, pp. 341-413.Search in Google Scholar

[52] D.S. Siegel et al., „Toward a Model of the Effective Transfer of Scientific Knowledge from Academicians to Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence from the Commercialization of University Technologies”, in Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 21(1- 2), March-June 2004, pp. 115-142.10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006Search in Google Scholar

[53] H.T. Stelfox et al., „Conflict of Interest in the Debate over Calcium-Channel Antagonists”, in New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 338(2), January 1998, pp. 101-106.10.1056/NEJM1998010833802069420342Search in Google Scholar

[54] P.M. Swamidass and V. Vulasa. „Why University Inventions Rarely Produce Income? Bottlenecks in University Technology Transfer”, in The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 34(4), August 2009, pp. 343-363.10.1007/s10961-008-9097-8Search in Google Scholar

[55] L.G. Zucker and M.R. Darby. „Star Scientists and Institutional Transformation: Patterns of Invention and Innovation in the Formation of the Biotechnology Industry”, Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 93(23), November 1996, pp. 12709-12716.10.1073/pnas.93.23.12709341268917483Search in Google Scholar

[56] L.G. Zucker et al., „Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises”, in The American Economic Review, vol. 88(1), March 1998, pp. 290-306.Search in Google Scholar

[57] L.G. Zucker et al., „Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Finn Performance in Biotechnology”, in Management Science, vol. 48(1), January 2002, pp. 138-153.10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274Search in Google Scholar

[58] D.J. Teece. „Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How”, in The Economic Journal, vol. 87(346), June 1977, pp. 242-261.10.2307/2232084Search in Google Scholar

[59] J.G. Thursby and M.C. Thursby. „Are Faculty Critical? Their Role in University-Industry Licensing”, in Contemporary Economic Policy, vol. 22(2), April 2004, pp.162-178.10.1093/cep/byh012Search in Google Scholar

[60] D.J. Triggle. „Patenting the Sun: Enclosing the Scientific Commons and Transforming the University - Ethical Concerns”, in Drug Development Research, vol. 63 (3), November 2004, pp. 139-149.10.1002/ddr.10404Search in Google Scholar

[61] J. Washburn. „Big Oil Buys Berkeley: The BP-UC Berkeley Research Deal Pushes Academic Integrity Aside for Profit”, in Los Angeles Times, 24 March 2007.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2450-5781
Sprache:
Englisch