Login
Registrieren
Passwort zurücksetzen
Veröffentlichen & Verteilen
Verlagslösungen
Vertriebslösungen
Themen
Allgemein
Altertumswissenschaften
Architektur und Design
Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Buchwissenschaft
Biologie
Chemie
Geowissenschaften
Geschichte
Industrielle Chemie
Informatik
Jüdische Studien
Kulturwissenschaften
Kunst
Linguistik und Semiotik
Literaturwissenschaft
Materialwissenschaft
Mathematik
Medizin
Musik
Pharmazie
Philosophie
Physik
Rechtswissenschaften
Sozialwissenschaften
Sport und Freizeit
Technik
Theologie und Religion
Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Veröffentlichungen
Zeitschriften
Bücher
Konferenzberichte
Verlage
Blog
Kontakt
Suche
EUR
USD
GBP
Deutsch
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Warenkorb
Home
Zeitschriften
Miscellanea Geographica
Band 24 (2020): Heft 4 (October 2020)
Uneingeschränkter Zugang
Consistency of the presentation of forests on topographic maps
Paweł Cebrykow
Paweł Cebrykow
und
Piotr Petrzak
Piotr Petrzak
| 31. Okt. 2020
Miscellanea Geographica
Band 24 (2020): Heft 4 (October 2020)
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zusammenfassung
Artikel
Figuren und Tabellen
Referenzen
Autoren
Artikel in dieser Ausgabe
Vorschau
PDF
Zitieren
Teilen
Online veröffentlicht:
31. Okt. 2020
Seitenbereich:
202 - 217
Eingereicht:
11. Mai 2020
Akzeptiert:
19. Juni 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0024
Schlüsselwörter
Topographic maps
,
change in forest coverage
,
forests
,
Roztocze
© 2020 Paweł Cebrykow, Piotr Petrzak, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
Range of test polygons A, B, C, and DSource: Own work based on the 1:250 000 map from the website – Geoportal 2
Figure 2
Test polygon A, map of the differences in forests coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 3
Study polygon A, relative errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 4
Test polygon A, absolute errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 5
Test polygon A, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 6
Test polygon A, relative errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 7
Test polygon A, absolute errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 8
Test polygon B, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 9
Test polygon B, relative errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 10
Test polygon B, absolute errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 11
Test polygon B, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 12
Test polygon B, relative errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 13
Test polygon B, absolute errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 14
Test polygon C, differences in the forest coverage between the aerial photograph and topographic maps: to the left the 92 1:10 000 map, and to the right the 1:50 000 VMap Level2 mapSource: Own work
Figure 15
Test polygon C, relative errors for the 1:10 000 in the 92 standard mapSource: Own work
Figure 16
Test polygon C, absolute errors for the 1:10 000 in the 92 standard mapSource: Own work
Figure 17
Test polygon C, relative errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 mapSource: Own work
Figure 18
Test polygon C, absolute errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 mapSource: Own work
Figure 19
Test polygon D, differences in the forest coverage between the aerial photograph and topographic maps: the 92 1:10 000 map to the left, and the 1:50 000 VMap Level2 map to the rightSource: Own work
Figure 20
Test polygon D, errors for the 1:10 000 in 92 map system: map of relative errors to the left, map of absolute errors to the rightSource: Own work
Figure 21
Test polygon D, errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 map: map of relative errors to the left, map of absolute errors to the rightSource: Own work
Total errors in the test polygons for the analysed maps (Source: Own work)
Map
Polygon A
Polygon B
Polygon C
Polygon D
%
ha
%
ha
%
ha
%
ha
Standard 65
1.38
56.42
4.17
125.76
-
-
-
-
GUGIK 80
1.92
78.50
9.85
362.97
-
-
-
-
Standard 92
-
-
-
-
-4.9
-100.36
-1.64
-72.27
VMap L2
-
-
-
-
-9.85
-201.93
-2.64
-116.22
Vorschau