Working with Response Probabilities

Bethlehem, J.G. 2002. “Weighting Nonresponse Adjustments Based on Auxiliary Information.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by Groves, R.M., D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 275–288. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Bethlehem, J.G. 2009. Applied Survey Methods, A Statistical Perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470494998.10.1002/9780470494998Search in Google Scholar

Bethlehem, J.G. and S. Biffignandi. 2012. Handbook of Web Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/978111812175.Search in Google Scholar

Bethlehem, J.G., F. Cobben, and B. Schouten. 2011. Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470891056.10.1002/9780470891056Search in Google Scholar

Bethlehem, J.G. and W.J. Keller. 1987. “Linear Weighting of Sample Survey Data.” Journal of Official Statistics 3: 141–153. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentas-sets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/linear-weighting-of-sample-survey-data.pdf (accessed June 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Cochran, W.G. 1968. “The Effectiveness of Adjustments by Subclassification in Removing in Observational Studies.” Biometrics 24: 205–2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2528036.10.2307/2528036Search in Google Scholar

Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling techniques. Third Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Deville, J.C. and C.E. Särndal. 1992. “Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 87: 376–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475217.10.1080/01621459.1992.10475217Search in Google Scholar

Deville, J.C., C.E. Särndal, and O. Sautory. 1993. “Generalized Raking Procedures in Survey Sampling.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 88: 1013–1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476369.10.1080/01621459.1993.10476369Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. 2006. “Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70: 646–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl033.10.1093/poq/nfl033Search in Google Scholar

Hazizi, D. and J.F. Beaumont. 2017. “Constructions of Weights in Surveys.” Statistical Science 32: 206–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/16-STS608.10.1214/16-STS608Search in Google Scholar

Horvitz, D.G. and D.J. Thompson. 1952. “A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 47: 663–685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446.10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446Search in Google Scholar

Keller, W.J., A. Verbeek, and J.G. Bethlehem. 1984. ANOTA: Analysis of Tables. Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands, Department for Statistical Methods. (CBS-report 5766-84-M1-3).Search in Google Scholar

Little, R.J.A. 1986. “Survey Nonresponse Adjustment for the Estimates of Means.” International Statistical Review 54: 139–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1403140.10.2307/1403140Search in Google Scholar

Little, R.J.A. and D.B. Rubin. 2002. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Second edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119013563.10.1002/9781119013563Search in Google Scholar

Lundquist, P. and C.E. Särndal. 2013. “Aspects of Responsive Design with Applications to the Swedish Living Conditions Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 557–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0033.10.1515/jos-2017-0033Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.-E. 2011. “The 2010 Morris Hansen Lecture: Dealing with Survey Nonresponse in Data Collection, in Estimation.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 1–21. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7-be7fb3/the-2010-morris-hansen-lecture-dealing-with-survey-nonresponse-in-data-collection-in-estimation.pdf (accessed May 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.E., K. Lumiste, and I. Traat. 2016. “Reducing the Response Imbalance: Is the Accuracy of the survey estimates improved?.” Survey Methodology 42: 219–238. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-001-x/2016002/article/14663-eng.htm (accessed June 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.E. and P. Lundquist. 2014a. “Balancing the Response and Adjusting Estimates for Nonresponse Bias: Complementary Activities.” Journal de la Société Française de Statistique 155: 28–50. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Balancing-the-response-and-adjusting-estimates-for-S%C3%A4rndal-Lundquist/9686e52f8875ff2b0120303ed2e24b2008f463df (accessed June 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.E. and P. Lundquist. 2014b. “Accuracy in Estimation with Nonresponse: A Function of Degree of Imbalance and Degree of Explanation.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2: 361–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smu014.10.1093/jssam/smu014Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.E. and P. Lundquist. 2017. “Inconsistent Regression and Nonresponse Bias: Exploring Their Relationship as a Function of Response Imbalance.” Journal of Official Statistics 33: 700–734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0033.10.1515/jos-2017-0033Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.-E. and S. Lundström. 2005. Estimation in Surveys with Nonresponse. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0470011351Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J.G. Bethlehem. 2009. “Measures for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 36: 101 – 113. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2009001/article/10887-eng.pdf?st=uZQq4P0J (accessed June 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Stoop, I.A.L. 2005. The Hunt for the Last Respondent. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ineke_Stoop/publication/27686407_The_Hunt_for_the_Last_Respondent_Nonresponse_in_Sample_Surveys/links/569791b908ae1c427905094e/The-Hunt-for-the-Last-Respondent-Non-response-in-Sample-Surveys.pdf (accessed June 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Valliant, R., J.A. Dever, and F. Kreuter. 2018. Practical Tools for Designing and Weighting Survey Samples. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93632-110.1007/978-3-319-93632-1Search in Google Scholar