[AAPOR (American Association of Public Opinion Research) Task Force on Survey Refusals. 2014. Current Knowledge and Considerations Regarding Survey Refusals. Available at: http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/MainSiteFiles/RefusalTF_FINAL090814.pdf (accessed 20 January 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[AAPOR: American Association of Public Opinion Research. 2016. Standard Definitions, Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf (accessed 28 April 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Atrostic, B.K., N. Bates, G. Burt, and A. Silberstein. 2001. “Nonresponse in US Government Household Surveys: Consistent Measures, Recent Trends, and New Insights.” Journal of Official Statistics 17: 209–226. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/nonresponse-in-u.s.-government-household-surveys-consistent-measures-recent-trends-and-new-insights.pdf (accessed 28 April 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bethlehem, J., F. Cobben, and B. Schouten. 2011. Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. New York: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470891056.10.1002/9780470891056]Search in Google Scholar
[Beullens, K., G. Loosveldt, C. Vandenplas, and I. Stoop. 2018. “Response Rates in The European Social Survey: Increasing, Decreasing, or a Matter of Fieldwork Efforts?” Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2018-00003.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biemer, P.P. and L.E. Lyberg. 2003. Introduction to Survey Quality. New York: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471458740.10.1002/0471458740]Search in Google Scholar
[Bradburn, N. 1992. “A Response to the Nonresponse Problem: Presidential Address AAPOR.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 391–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/56.3.391.10.1093/poq/56.3.391]Search in Google Scholar
[Brehm, J. 1993. The Phantom Respondents: Opinion Surveys and Political Representation. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9690285.10.3998/mpub.9690285]Search in Google Scholar
[Brick, J.M. 2013. “Unit Nonresponse and Weighting Adjustments: A Critical Review.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 329–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0026.10.2478/jos-2013-0026]Search in Google Scholar
[Chun, A.Y., S.G. Heeringa, and B. Schouten. 2018. “Responsive and Adaptive Design for Survey Optimization.” Journal of Official Statistics 34: 581–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0028.10.2478/jos-2018-0028]Search in Google Scholar
[Curtin, R., S. Presser, and E. Singer. 2005. “Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse Over the Past Quarter Century.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69: 87–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi002.10.1093/poq/nfi002]Search in Google Scholar
[De Heer, W. 1999. “International Response Trends: Results of An International Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 15: 129–142. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/international-response-trends-results-ofan-international-survey.pdf (accessed 14 February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E.D. 2018. “Mixed-Mode: Past, Present, and Future”. Survey Research Methods, 17: 75–89. Available at: https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/7402/6582 (accessed 20 January 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E., and W. De Heer. 2002. “Trends in Household Survey Nonresponse: A Longitudinal and International Comparison.” In Survey Nonresponse, Edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, R.J.A. Little, 41–54. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E., J. Hox, and A. Luiten. 2018. “International Nonresponse Trends Across Countries and Years: An Analysis of 36 Years of Labor Force Survey Data.” Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. Available at: https://surveyinsights.org/?p=10452 (accessed 28 April 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E., J. Hox, H. Silber, B. Struminskaya, and C. Vis. 2019. “Development of An International Survey Attitude Scale: Measurement Equivalance, Reliability, and Predictive Validity.” Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences,1:9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-019-0012-x.10.1186/s42409-019-0012-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A. 2017. “The Promise and Challenges of Pushing Respondents to the Web in Mixed-Mode Surveys.” Survey Methodology. Statistics Canada, Catalogue No. 12–001–X, Vol. 43, No. 1. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12-001-x/2017001/article/14836-eng.htm (accessed 5 May 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys; the Total Design Method. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A., J. L. Eltinge, R.M. Groves, and R.J.A. Little. 2002. “Survey nonresponse in design, data collection, and analysis”. In Survey Nonresponse, Edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little: 3–26. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A., J.D. Smyth, and L.M. Christian. 2014. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys. The Tailored Design Method, Fourth Edition. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dutwin D. and P.J. Lavrakas. 2017. Trends in Telephone Outcomes, Appendix D to the Future of US General Population Telephone Survey Research AAPOR Task Force Report 2017. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/Education-Resources/Reports/The-Future-Of-U-S-General-Population-Telephone-Sur.aspx?utm_source=link_news-v9&utm_campaign_item_225143&utm_medium=copy (accessed 14 February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471725277.10.1002/0471725277]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Survey Interviews. New York: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118490082.10.1002/9781118490082]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler, M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2004. Survey Methodology, Second Edition. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guilford, J.P. and B. Fruchter. 1978. Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. New York, London: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harris-Kojetin, B.A. and C. Tucker. 1999. “Exploring the Relations of Economic and Political Conditions With Refusal Rates to a Government Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 15: 167–184. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41-fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/exploring-the-relation-of-economic-and-political-conditions-with-refusal-rates-to-a-government-survey.pdf (accessed 14 April 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hox, J.J. and E.D. De Leeuw. 1994. “A Comparison of Nonresponse in Mail, Telephone, and Face-to-face Surveys; Applying Multilevel Models to Meta-Analysis.” Quality and Quantity 28: 329-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01097014.10.1007/BF01097014]Search in Google Scholar
[Hox, J., M. Moerbeek, and R. Van De Schoot. 2018. Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications. New York, London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650982.10.4324/9781315650982]Search in Google Scholar
[Larsen, L.J, J. Fane Lineback, and B.M. Reist 2020 “Continuing to Explore the Relation between Economic and Political Factors and Government Survey Refusal Rates: 1960–2015”. Journal of Official Statistics, this issue.10.2478/jos-2020-0026]Search in Google Scholar
[Lavrakas, P.J., M.W. Traugott, C. Kennedy, A.L. Holbrook, E.D. De Leeuw, and B.T. West. 2019. Experimental Methods in Survey Research. Techniques That Combine Random Sampling With Random Assignment. New York: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119083771.10.1002/9781119083771]Search in Google Scholar
[Loosveldt, G. 2019. Valedictory Address. Leuven: KU Leuven, November 15, 2019. Available at: https://soc.kuleuven.be/fsw/nieuws/emeritaat-geert-loosveldt (accessed June 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Loosveldt, G. and D. Joye. 2016. “Defining and Assessing Survey Climate.” In The Sage Handbook of Survey Methodology, Edited by C. Wolf, D. Joye, T.W. Smith, and Y-C Fu, 67-76. Los Angeles: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893.n27.10.4135/9781473957893.n27]Search in Google Scholar
[Luiten, A., E. de Leeuw, B. Schouten, and J. Hox. 2016. “First Results of the (new) International Questionnaire on Nonresponse: Response of the LFS.” Paper Presented at International Workshop of Household Survey Nonresponse, Oslo, Norway, 31-8/1-9, 2016. Available at: https://www.nonresponse.org/uploadi/editor/DnD148714714898539LuiteneaInternationalQuestionnaire.docx (accessed June 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Marken, S. 2018. Still Listening: The State of Telephone Surveys. Gallup. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/opinion/methodology/225143/listening-state-telephone-surveys.aspx (accessed 14 July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Muthén, L.K. and B.O. Muthén. 2017. Mplus User’s Guide. Eight Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pew Research. 2012. Assessing the Representativeness of Public Opinion Surveys. Available at: https://www.people-press.org/2012/05/15/assessing-the-representativeness-of-public-opinion-surveys/ (accessed 28 April 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/indicators-for-monitoring-and-improving-representativeness-of-response.pdf (accessed 28 April 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E. 2002. “The Use of Incentives to Reduce Nonresponse in Household Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, Edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 163–178. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E. and C. Ye. 2013. “The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys”. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645: 112–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212458082.10.1177/0002716212458082]Search in Google Scholar
[Steeh, C. 1981. “Trends in Nonresponse Rates, 1952-1979.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 40–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/268633.10.1086/268633]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoop, I. 2005. The Hunt for the Last Respondent. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office. Available at: https://www.scp.nl/english/Publications/Publications_-by_year/Publications_2005/The_Hunt_for_the_Last_Respondent (accessed 14 February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoop, I. 2016. “Unit Nonresponse“. In The Sage Handbook of Survey Methodology, Edited by C. Wolf, D. Joye, T.W. Smith, and Y-C Fu, 409-424. Los Angeles: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893.n27.10.4135/9781473957893.n27]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoop, I., J. Billiet, A. Koch, and R. Fitzgerald. 2010. Improving Survey Response: Lessons Learned from the European Social Survey. Chichester: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470688335.10.1002/9780470688335]Search in Google Scholar
[Tabachnick, B.G., and L. Fidell. 2013. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., J.M. Brick, S. Lohr, and J. Li. 2016. “Adaptive and Responsive Survey Designs: A Review and Assessment.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A. 180: 203 223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12186.10.1111/rssa.12186]Search in Google Scholar
[Vehovar, V. 1999. “Field Substitution and Unit Nonresponse”. Journal of Official Statistics, 15: 333–550. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41-fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/field-substitution-and-unit-nonresponse.pdf (accessed 28 April 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, D. and J.M. Brick. 2018. “Trends in US Face-to-Face Household Survey Nonresponse and Level of Effort”. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 6: 186–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx019.10.1093/jssam/smx019]Search in Google Scholar