[ALLISON, P. D. 1999. Multiple Regression: a primer. Pine Forge Press: Thousand Oaks.]Search in Google Scholar
[AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION. 1994. DSM-IV. 4th Ed.]Search in Google Scholar
[AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ADDICTION MEDICINE. 2011. Definition of Addiction, http://www.asam.orgfor-the-public/definition-of-addiction]Search in Google Scholar
[AMICHAI–HAMBURGER, Y. 2002. Internet and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 1–10.10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00034-6]Search in Google Scholar
[ANDREASSEN, C.S., GRIFFITHS, M.D., GJERTSEN, S.R., KROSSBAKKEN, E., KVAM, S., PALLESEN, S. (2013). The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(2), 90 – 99.10.1556/JBA.2.2013.00326165928]Search in Google Scholar
[AUGNER, C., HACKER, G. W. 2012. Associations between problematic mobile phone use and psychological parameters in young adults. In: International Journal of Public Health, 57, 437 – 441.10.1007/s00038-011-0234-z]Search in Google Scholar
[BATIGÜN, A.D., KILIC, N. 2011. The relationships between internet addiction, social support, psychological symptoms and some socio-demographical variables. Türk Psikol Derg, 26 (67), 1 – 10.]Search in Google Scholar
[BOCIJ, P. 2006. The dark side of the internet: protecting yourself and your family from online criminals. ISBN: 0-275-98757-X]Search in Google Scholar
[CAMPOS, J. A., ZUCOLOTO, M. L., BONAFE, F. S., JORDANI, P. C., MAROCO, J. 2011. Reliability and validity of self-reported burnout in college students: A cross randomized comparison of paper-and-pencil vs. online administration. In: Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1875–1883.10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.011]Search in Google Scholar
[COHEN, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[CORREA, T., HINSLEY, A. W., DE ZÚÑIGA, H. G. 2010. Who interacts on the Web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. In: Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.00310.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[CHANG, M.K., LAW, S.P.M. 2008. Factor Structure for Young’s Internet Addiction Test: A confimatory study. Computers in Human Behavior. 24(6), 2597–2619.10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.001]Search in Google Scholar
[ODACI, H., ÇELIK, Ç. B. 2013. Who are problematic internet users? An investigation of the correlations between problematic internet use and shyness, loneliness, narcissism, aggression and selfperception. Computers in Human Behavior 29(6), 2382–2387.10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.026]Search in Google Scholar
[CHOU C., CONDRON L., BELLAND J.C.. 2005. A review of the research on Internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 363–88.10.1007/s10648-005-8138-1]Search in Google Scholar
[De COCK, R., VANGEEL, J., KLEIN, A., MINOTTE, P., ROSAS, O., MEERKERK, G.J. 2014. Compulsive use of social networking sites in Belgium: prevalence, profile, and the role of attitude toward work and school. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 17(3), 166–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0029.10.1089/cyber.2013.002924111599]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[DEMKANIN, P. 2008. One small, but significant step in science education in Slovakia. In P. Demkanin, B. Kibble, J. Lavonen, J. G. Mas, & J. Turlo Eds., Effective use of ICT in science education. 120–140. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, School of Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[DOUGLAS A.C., MILLS J.E., NIANG M., STEPCHENKOVA S., BYUN S., RUFF;INI C., et al. 2008. Internet addiction: meta-synthesis of qualitative research for the decade 1996-2006. Computers in Human Behavior. 24(6), 302–744.10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.009]Search in Google Scholar
[DURAK, M., SENOL-DURAK, E. 2010. Which personality traits are associated with cognitions related to problematic Internet use? Manuscript under evaluation.]Search in Google Scholar
[FANČOVIČOVÁ, J., PROKOP, P. 2008. Students’ attitudes toward computer use in Slovakia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 255 – 262.10.12973/ejmste/75347]Search in Google Scholar
[FERRARO, G., CACI, B., D’AMICO, A., BLASI, M. D. 2007. Internet addiction disorder: An Italian study. In: CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(2), 170–175.10.1089/cpb.2006.9972]Search in Google Scholar
[FLOROS, G., SIOMOS, K. 2014. Excessive internet use and personality traits. In: Curr Behav Neurosci Reports, 1, 19–26.10.1007/s40473-014-0006-1]Search in Google Scholar
[FOX, S., RAINIE, L., LARSEN, E., HORRIGAN, J., LENHART, A., SPOONER, T., CARTER, C. 2001. Wired Seniors. The Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved May 4th 2005 from:http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Wired_Seniors_Report.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[GHASSEMZADEH, L., SHAHRARAY, M., MORADI, A. 2008. Prevalence of Internet addiction and comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Iranian high schools. In: CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 731–733.10.1089/cpb.2007.0243]Search in Google Scholar
[GORSUCH, R. L., 1983. Factor Analysis, second edition, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[GRIFFITHS, M. D. 1996. Gambling on the Internet: A brief note. In: Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 471–473.10.1007/BF01539190]Search in Google Scholar
[GRIFFITHS, M.D., HUNT, N. 1998. Dependence on computer games by adolescents. In: Psychology Reports, 82, 475–480.10.2466/pr0.1998.82.2.475]Search in Google Scholar
[HA, Y. M., HWANG, W. J. 2014. Gender Differences in Internet Addiction Associated with Psychological Health Indicators Among Adolescents Using a National Web-based Survey. In: International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 12 (5), 660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-014-9500-710.1007/s11469-014-9500-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HAWI, N. S. 2012. Internet addiction among adolescents in Lebanon. In: Computers in Human Behavior 28(3): 1044–1053.10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.007]Search in Google Scholar
[HIRZALLA, F., VAN ZOONEN, L. 2008. Usesofthe Web for Civic Participation: výskumná správa. London: Institute of Education. 140 pages. http://www.civicweb.eu/images/stories/reports/wp9civicwebdeliverable8.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[HORRIGAN, J., RAINIE, L. 2006. The internet’s growing in life’s major moments. Retrieved August 30, http://www/pewinternet.org/PPF/r/181/reportdisplay.asp]Search in Google Scholar
[HOSŤOVECKÝ, M. ZAŤKOVÁ, T. 2010. Options for implementing videoconferencing system in a combined form of education. In: Acta Universitatis Facultatis Paedagogicae Tyrnaviensis. Ser. C – Trnava, 157-164.]Search in Google Scholar
[KALKAN, M. 2012. Predictiveness of interpersonal cognitive distortions on university students’ problematic internet use. In: Children and Youth Services Review 3(7), 1305–1308.10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.003]Search in Google Scholar
[KEDEM, C. 1999. The social impact of the internet on our society. Retrieved August 30, 2006, http://www.math.umd.edu/~bnk/CAR/project.htm.]Search in Google Scholar
[KO, CH., YEN, J.Y., YEN, C.F., LIN, H.C., YANG, M.J. 2007. Factors predictive for incidence and remission of Internet addiction in young adolescents: A prospective study. In: CyberPsychology & Behavior. 10, 545-551.10.1089/cpb.2007.9992]Search in Google Scholar
[KO, CH., YEN, J.Y., YEN, C.F., CHEN, C.S., CHEN, C.C. 2012. The association between Internet addiction and psychiatric disorder: a review of the literature. In: Eur Psychiatry. 27(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.04.01110.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.04.01122153731]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[KRAUT, R., PATTERSON, M., LUNDMARK, V., KIESLER, S., MUKOPHADHYAY, T., SCHERLIS, W. 1998. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? In: American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017]Search in Google Scholar
[KUNIMURA, M., THOMAS, V. 2000. Summary and review of the NEO-PI-R personality test. Journal of LoyolaMary mount University. 2000;38(4):1–13]Search in Google Scholar
[LANDERS, R. N., LOUNSBURY, J. W. 2006. An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. In: Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 283–293. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.001.10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[LEWIS, I., WATSON, B., WHITE, K. M. 2009. Internet versus paper-and-pencil survey methods in psychological experiments: Equivalence testing of participant responses to health-related messages. In: Australian Journal of Psychology, 61, 107–116.10.1080/00049530802105865]Search in Google Scholar
[LIĆWINKO, J., KRAJEWSKA-KUŁAK, E., & ŁUKASZUK, C. 2011. Internet addiction among academic youth in Białystok. Progress in Health Sciences, 1(1), 124-130.]Search in Google Scholar
[LOCKE, S. D., GILBERT, B. O. 1995. Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experiential differences: A study of computer, questionnaire, and interview assessment formats. In: Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 255–263.]Search in Google Scholar
[MATTHEWS, G., DEARY, I. J., WHITEMAN, M. C. 2009. Personality traits (3rd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. In Internet addiction in adolescents: Prevalence and risk factors. In: Computer in Human Behavior.10.1017/CBO9780511812743]Search in Google Scholar
[MIŠÚT, M., PRIBILOVÁ, K. 2013: Communication impact on project oriented teaching in technology supported education. In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 152 LNEE, 559-567.10.1007/978-1-4614-3535-8_47]Search in Google Scholar
[MONTAG, C., JURKIEWICZ, M., REUTER, M. 2010. Low self-directedness is a better predictor for problematic internet use than high neuroticism. In: Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1531–1535. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.02110.1016/j.chb.2010.05.021]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MUSCH, J., BRODER, A., KLAUER, K. C. 2001. Improving survey research on the world-wide web using the randomized response technique. In U-D. Reips and M. Bosnjak (Ed.), Dimensions of internet science (179–192). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[OZCAN, N.K. BUZLU, S. 2007. Internet use and its relation with the psychosocial situation for a sample of university students. In: Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(6), 767–772.10.1089/cpb.2007.9953]Search in Google Scholar
[ORZACK, M. 1999. Computer addiction: Is it real or virtual? Harvard Mental Health Letter, 15(7), 8.]Search in Google Scholar
[PODSAKOFF, P. M., MACKENZIE, S., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, P. N. 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. In: The Journal of applied psychology, 88(5). 879–903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.87910.1037/0021-9010.88.5.87914516251]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[VAN GELDER, M., BRETVELD, R. W., ROELEVELD, N. 2010. Web-based questionnaires: The future in epidemiology? Internet versus paper-and-pencil survey methods in psychological experiments: Equivalence testing of participant responses to health-related messages. In: American Journal of Epidemiology, 172, 1292–1298.10.1093/aje/kwq291]Search in Google Scholar
[RAMMSTEDT, B., JOHN, O. P. 2007. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. In: Journal of Research in Personality. 41, 203-212. ISSN: 0092-6566. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265660600019510.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001]Search in Google Scholar
[RICE, L., & MARKEY, P. M. 2009. The role of extraversion and neuroticism in influencing anxiety following computer-mediated interactions. In: Personality and Individual Differences, 46 (1), 35-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.02210.1016/j.paid.2008.08.022]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[RYAN, T., XENOS, S. 2011. ‘Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage’, In: Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (5), 1658-1664.10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004]Search in Google Scholar
[SAINI, V. K., BANIYA, G. CH., VERMA, K. K., SONI, A., KESHAWANI, S. 2016. A study on relationship of internet addictive behavior with personality traits among medical students. In: Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour, 21(2), 108–111.10.4103/0971-8990.193429]Search in Google Scholar
[SIOMOS, K. E., DAFOULI, E. D., BRAIMIOTIS, D. A., MOUZAS, O. D., & ANGELOPOULOS, N. V. 2008. Internet addiction among Greek adolescent students. In: CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11 (6), 653–657.10.1089/cpb.2008.0088]Search in Google Scholar
[SLOVAK REPUBLIC. 2017. Law no. 369/1990, § 22 “The Law about General Settlement” http://www.zakonypreludi.sk/zz/1990-369]Search in Google Scholar
[STEPANIKOVA, I., Nie, N. H., & He, X. 2010. Time on the Internet at home, loneliness, and life satisfaction: Evidence from panel time-diary data. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 329-338.10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.002]Search in Google Scholar
[TAKESHI, S. 2006. Internet Addiction among Students: Prelevance and psychological problems in Japan. In JMAJ 49 (7-8). 279-283. http://www.med.or.jp/english/pdf/2006_07%2B/279_283.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[VRABEC, N. 2009. On-line generácia: informácie, komunikácia a digitálna participácia mládeže v informačnej spoločnosti: výskumná správa. Bratislava: MŠ SR a IUVENTA. 59 s. http://www.iuventa.sk/files/documents/7_vyskummladeze/spravy/davm027/on_line_generacia_publikacia.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[WEST, R. 2013. Models of addiction. In EMCDDA Insights [online]. No. 14, 161p. ISSN 2314-9264. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/insights/models-addiction]Search in Google Scholar
[UYENCO, B., KINGDON, A. 2010. Young Adults Revealed: The lives and motivations of 21st century youth, advertising.microsoft.com/wwdocs/.../Young-Adults-Revealed.pdf,]Search in Google Scholar
[YOUNG, K. S. 1996. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. In: Cyber Psychology and Behavior. 237-244. ISSN 1094-9313. http://www.chabad4israel.org/tznius4israel/newdisorder.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[YOUNG, K. 1998. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. In: CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1, 237-244.10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237]Search in Google Scholar
[YOUNG, K., ROGERS, R. C. 1998. The Relationship between depression and Internet Addiction. In: CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(1): 25-28. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.2510.1089/cpb.1998.1.25]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[YANG, S., & TUNG, C. 2007. Comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. In: Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 79–96.10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.037]Search in Google Scholar
[TOSUN, N. – BARIS, M. F. 2011. The Place and Importance of Computer and Internet’s In Secondary School Students’ Life. In: Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 28, 530 – 535.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.102]Search in Google Scholar
[TSAI, C. C., & LIN, C.C. 2004. Taiwanese adolescents’ perceptions and attitudes regarding the Internet: Exploring gender differences. In: Adolescence, 39, 725-734.]Search in Google Scholar
[TSAI, H. F., CHENG, S. H., YEH, T. L., SHIH, C. C., CHEN, K. C., YANG, Y. C., YANG, Y. K. 2009. The risk factors of internet addiction—A survey of university freshmen. In: Psychiatry Research, 167, 294-299.10.1016/j.psychres.2008.01.015]Search in Google Scholar
[ZAMANI, B. E., ABEDINI, Y., KHERADMAND, A. 2011. Internet Addiction Based on Personality Characteristics of High School Students in Kerman, Iran. In: Addict Health. Summer-Autumn; 3(3-4), 85–91.]Search in Google Scholar