<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>This contribution interprets the intertwined issues of science, epistemology, society, and politics in Gramsci’s <italic>Prison Notebooks</italic> as a culturalist approach to science that does not renounce objectivity. Gramsci particularly criticized the scientist positions taken by the Bolshevik leader Nikolai Bukharin in <italic>Historical Materialism</italic> (1921) and the conference communication he delivered at the International Congress of History of Science and Technology in London in 1931. Gramsci did not avoid, at least implicitly, engaging with the theses of Lenin’s <italic>Materialism and Empiriocriticism</italic> (1909). Gramsci’s reception of these Russian positions was twofold: on the one hand, he agreed with the centrality of praxis (and politics) for a correct assessment of the meaning of epistemological positions; on the other hand, he disagreed with the reduction of the problem of epistemology to the dichotomy of materialism and idealism at the expense of any consideration of the ideological dimension of science.</p>
</abstract>

This contribution interprets the intertwined issues of science, epistemology, society, and politics in Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks as a culturalist approach to science that does not renounce objectivity. Gramsci particularly criticized the scientist positions taken by the Bolshevik leader Nikolai Bukharin in Historical Materialism (1921) and the conference communication he delivered at the International Congress of History of Science and Technology in London in 1931. Gramsci did not avoid, at least implicitly, engaging with the theses of Lenin’s Materialism and Empiriocriticism (1909). Gramsci’s reception of these Russian positions was twofold: on the one hand, he agreed with the centrality of praxis (and politics) for a correct assessment of the meaning of epistemological positions; on the other hand, he disagreed with the reduction of the problem of epistemology to the dichotomy of materialism and idealism at the expense of any consideration of the ideological dimension of science.

The Struggle for Objectivity: Gramsci’s Historical-Political Vistas on Science against the Background of Lenin’s Epistemology

HoST - Journal  of History of Science and Technology

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This contribution interprets the intertwined issues of science, epistemology, society, and politics in Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks as a culturalist approach to...

The Struggle for Objectivity: Gramsci’s Historical-Political Vistas on Science against the Background of Lenin’s Epistemology

Online veröffentlicht: 24. Dez. 2020

Seitenbereich: 13 - 49

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/host-2020-0013

Schlüsselwörter
Gramsci’s political epistemology, Lenin’s, Bukharin’s epistemology, Marxist STS, political objectivity

© 2020 Pietro Daniel Omodeo, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The Struggle for Objectivity: Gramsci’s Historical-Political Vistas on Science against the Background of Lenin’s Epistemology

Online veröffentlicht: 24. Dez. 2020

Seitenbereich: 13 - 49

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/host-2020-0013

SchlüsselwörterGramsci’s political epistemology, Lenin’s, Bukharin’s epistemology, Marxist STS, political objectivity

© 2020 Pietro Daniel Omodeo, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Schlüsselwörter
Gramsci’s political epistemology, Lenin’s, Bukharin’s epistemology, Marxist STS, political objectivity