[
1. Bansal, S. K., & Kagemann, S. (2015). Integrating big data: A semantic extract-transform-load framework. Computer, 48(3), 42-50. doi: 10.1109/MC.2015.7610.1109/MC.2015.76
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Bozkurt, A., Keskin, N. O., & de Waard, I. (2016). Research Trends in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Theses and Dissertations: Surfing the Tsunami Wave. Open Praxis, 8(3), 203-221. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ111255610.5944/openpraxis.8.3.287
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Clark, D. (2013, April 16). MOOCs: taxonomy of 8 types of MOOC. Donald Clark Plan B [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/moocs-taxonomy-of-8-types-of-mooc.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Conole, G. (2014). A new classification schema for MOOCs. The International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 2(3), 65-77. Retrieved from http://empower.eadtu.eu/images/fields-of-expertise/OERsMOOCs/INNOQUAL-Issue-3-Publication-Sep-2014-FINAL-w-cover.pdf#page=72
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Conole, G. (2015). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 39. Retrieved from http://www.um.es/ead/red/39/conole.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Cormier, D. (2008, October 2). The CCK08 MOOC – Connectivism course, 1/4 Way. Dave’s Educational Blog [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://davecormier.com/edblog/2008/10/02/the-cck08-mooc-connectivism-course-14-way/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interactive Media in education, 2012(3). http://doi.org/10.5334/2012-1810.5334/2012-18
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism & connective knowledge. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(1), A6. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol5/iss1/6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Ebben, M., & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: a review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 328-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.87835210.1080/17439884.2013.878352
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Ferguson, R., & Clow, D. (2015). Examining engagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 16–20 March 2015, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA, ACM, 51-58. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1145/2723576.272360610.1145/2723576.2723606
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and Reality. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED547237.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.165110.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Jordan, K. (2015). MOOC Research Literature Browser. Retrieved from http://www.katyjordan.com/moocliterature
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227.10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K. Ø., & Williams, S. A. (2015a). Who are with us: MOOC learners on a FutureLearn course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 557-569.10.1111/bjet.12261
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K. Ø., & Williams, S. A. (2015b). Massive Open Online Courses and Economic Sustainability. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2015-001510.1515/eurodl-2015-0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Mohamed, M. H., & Hammond, M. (2017). MOOCs: A Differentiation by Pedagogy, Content and Assessment. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1). http://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-07-2017-006210.1108/IJILT-07-2017-0062
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Pilli, O., & Admiraal, W. (2016). A taxonomy for Massive Open Online Courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(3), 223-240. Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/47088/Pilli_Admiraal2016.pdf10.30935/cedtech/6174
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 15(2). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2012/Rodriguez.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education – A white paper: JISC CETIS. Retrieved from https://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
