Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Introducing a Structured Format for Learner Selfassessment: the Tutor’S Perspective


Zitieren

1. Andrade, H. and Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting Learning and Achievement through Self- Assessment. In Theory into Practice, 48(1), (pp. 12-19). Available through: EBSCOhost [Accessed 20 August 2014].Search in Google Scholar

2. Beaumont, C.; O’Doherty, M. and Shannon, L., (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: a key to improving student learning. In Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), (pp. 671-687). Available through: Anglia Ruskin Library Website, http://libweb.anglia.ac.uk [accessed 28 June 2014].Search in Google Scholar

3. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. In Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), (pp. 151-167). Available through: EBSCOhost Professional Development Collection [Accessed 28 June 2014].Search in Google Scholar

4. Carless, D.; Salter, D.; Yang, M. and Lam, J., (2010). Developing sustainable feedback practices. In Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), (pp. 395-407). Available through: EBSCOhost [Accessed 29 June 2014].Search in Google Scholar

5. Cavanaugh, J. (2005). Teaching online - A time comparison. In Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). Available at http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring_81/cavanaugh81.htmSearch in Google Scholar

6. Cooper, N.J. (2000). Facilitating learning from formative feedback in level 3 assessment. In Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), (pp. 279-291). Available through: EBSCOhost [18 November 2014].Search in Google Scholar

7. Gibbs, G. and Simpson, C. (2004-5). Conditions under which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning. In Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, (pp. 3-31). Available at: https://www.open.ac.uk/fast/pdfs/Gibbs%20and%20Simpson%202004-05.pdf [Accessed 15 November 2014].Search in Google Scholar

8. Gosling, D. and Moon, J. (2002). How to use Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria. Southern England Consortium for Credit Accumulation and Transfer SEEC 3rd.Search in Google Scholar

9. Higgins, R.; Hartley, P. and Skelton, A. (2002). The Conscientious Consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. In Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), (pp. 53-64). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 28 June 2014].Search in Google Scholar

10. McDonald, B. and Boud, D. (2003). The Impact of Self-assessment on Achievement: the effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. In Assessment in Education, 10(2), (pp. 209-220).10.1080/0969594032000121289Search in Google Scholar

11. McGarrell, H. and Verbeem, J. (2007). Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback. In ELT Journal, 61(3), (pp. 228-236). Available through: Oxford University Press Journals [accessed 28 June 2014].Search in Google Scholar

12. McKenney, C.; Peffley, E. and Teolis, I., (2010). Comparison of time investment in common teaching practices among three instructional methods. In Teaching Methods, 20(1), (pp. 245-249). Available through: Highwire Press Free [accessed 28 August 2014].Search in Google Scholar

13. Nicol, D.J. and MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. In Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), (pp. 199-218). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 28 June 2014].Search in Google Scholar

14. Panagiotis, A. and Chrysoula, I. (2010). Communication between tutors - students in DL: A case study of the Hellenic Open University. In EURODL, 13(2). Available at http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2010&halfyear=2&article=407.Search in Google Scholar

15. Salmon, G. (2006). e-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. 2nd ed. Oxon: Taylor and Francis Books Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

16. Shute, V.A. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. In Review of Educational Research, 78(1), (pp. 153-189). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 28 June 2014].Search in Google Scholar

17. Simpson, O. (2008). Motivating learners in open and distance learning: do we need a new theory of learner support? In Open Learning, 23(3), (pp.159-170). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 20 November 2014].Search in Google Scholar

18. Tallent-Runnels, M.K.; Thomas, J.A.; Lan, W.Y.; Cooper, S.; Ahern, T.C.; Shaw, S.M.; X, Liu (2006). Teaching courses online: a Review of the research. In Review of Educational Research, 76(1), (pp. 93-135). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 28 June 2014].Search in Google Scholar

19. Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: do students find them usable? In Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), (pp. 67-78). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 1 July 2014].Search in Google Scholar

20. Watts, J.H. and Waraker S.M. (2008). When is a student not a student? Issues of identity and conflict on a distance learning work-based nurse education programme. In Learning in Health and Social Care, 7(2), (pp. 105-113). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 29 June 2014].Search in Google Scholar

21. Weaver, M.R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. In Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), (pp. 379-394). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 29 June 2014].Search in Google Scholar

22. Wingate, U. (2010). The impact of formative feedback on the development of academic Writing. In Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), (pp. 519-533). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 20 August 2014].Search in Google Scholar

23. Zembylas, M.; Theodorou, M. and Pavlakis, A. (2008). The role of emotions in the experience of online learning: challenges and opportunities. In Educational Media International, 45(2), (pp. 107-117). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 20 August 2014]. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1027-5207
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Sozialwissenschaften, Pädagogik, Lehrplan und Pädagogik, andere