[[1] Aufhauser, E. (2005). Unternehmerinnen & Unternehmen in der Innovationsregion Süd Ost. [Project Ginnova]. Universität Wien.]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Burgess, G. (2008). Planning and the Gender Equality Duty- why does gender matter? In: People, Place and Policy Online 2(3), 112-121.10.3351/ppp.0002.0003.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Buchinger, B., Huber, P., Lutz, H., Mayrhuber, C. & Schratzenstaller, M. (2010). Salzburger Leitbild für Chancengleichheit von Frauen und Männern. Wien: Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] De Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkely: University of Califonia Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] CEC (2010). Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union C 83, 391-403.]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] CEC (2006a). Council Decision of 6 October 2006 on Community strategic guidelines on cohesion. Official Journal of the European Union L291, 11-32.]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Cortolezis, H. (2010). Steht Regionalentwicklung drauf, muss Gender Mainstreaming rein.Raum vol. 77, 26-29.]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Damyanovic, D. (2007). Landschaftsplanung als Qualitätssicherung zur Umsetzung der Strategie des Gender Mainstreaming. Theoretische und methodische Konzepte eines gendergerechten Planungsprozesses als Bestandteil des Örtlichen Entwicklungskonzeptes dargestellt an der Fallstudie Tröplach/Stadtgemeinde Hermargor/Pressegger See (Kärnten). Wien: Guthmann-Peterson.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Demochange (2013). Der demographische Wandel. Herausforderungen für Raumplanung und Regionalentwicklung. Land Salzburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Demochange (2011a). Demographic Change in Model Regions Pongau-Pinzgau-Lungau. [Short Regional Report]. Land Salzburg/Universität Salzburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Demochange (2011b). Porträt der Salzburger Modellregion Pongau-Pinzgau-Lungau. Land Salzburg/Universität Salzburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Dollinger, F., Spitzer, W., Prinz, T. & Wankiewicz, H. (2010). Raumplanung als Alltagsmanagement für ALLE? Herausforderungen des demographischen Wandels - Werkstattbericht Demochange. In Schrenk, M., Popovich, V. V., Zeile, P, eds.: Real Corp Proceedings (pp. 599-608). Wien.]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Egerö, B. (2012). Four decades of Swedish cohousing - what chances of a real take-off? In Proceedings of the conference‚ Self-managed co-housing: born out of needs or new form of life? (pp. 66-80): Tours: CNRS.]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Fainstein, S. (2009). Spatial Justice and Planning. Journal on Spatial Justice and Planning 1(1), 58-77.]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Fainstein, S. & Servon, L. (2005). Gender and planning: A Reader. Piscataway (NJ): Rutgers University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Greed, C. (1994). Women and Planning. London: Taylor and Francis.]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Magel, H., et al. (2011), Warum Frauen nicht arbeiten können und Männer das Geld verdienen. München: Grontmij.]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Häberli, R., Lüscher, C., Praplan Chastonay, B. & Wyss, C. (1991). Boden-Kultur.Vorschläge für eine haushälterische Nutzung des Bodens in der Schweiz. Zurich: Verlag der Fachvereine.]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies.London. UBC Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[[20] Horelli, L. (2013). Gender Sensitive E-Planning for Sustaining Everyday Life. In Sanchez de Madariaga, I. & Roberts, M., eds, Fair Shared Cities. The Impact of Gender Planning in Europe (pp. 231-248). Farnham: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] Horelli, L., (2010). Sustaining Everyday Life through Psychological Presence, Time, and Space. In: Karlsson, K. & Ellegård, K., eds., Proceedings of the Sustaining Everyday Life Conference. Issue 38. Linköping University.]Search in Google Scholar
[[22] Horelli, L. (2009). Gender-Sensitive Community Informatics for Sustaining Everyday Life.Paper presented for the Madrid EURA-Conference on “City futures in a Globalised World” - Madrid 04.-06.06.2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[[23] Hudson, C. & Rönnblom, M. (2008). The Woman-Made City - Feminist Utopia or Practical Possibility? In Denèfle S., ed., Utopies féministes et expérimentations urbaines (pp. 73-90).PU Rennes.10.4000/books.pur.1536]Search in Google Scholar
[[24] Kail, E. & Irschek, E. (2010). Fair shared city: Gender Mainstreaming planning strategy in Vienna In Gender and Urban policies, strategies for gender mainstreaming and local governance (pp. 43-66). City of Seoul.]Search in Google Scholar
[[25] Karlsson, K. & Ellegård, K., eds. (2009). Proceedings of the Sustaining Everyday Life Conference. Issue 38. Linköping University.]Search in Google Scholar
[[26] Labit, A. (2012). Self-managed cohousing within the context of an ageing population: some experiences in France, Germany and Sweden. In Proceedings of the conference ‚Selfmanaged co-housing: born out of needs or new form of life?’ (pp. 66-80): Tours: CNRS.]Search in Google Scholar
[[27] Land Salzburg (2009). Sachprogramm. Standortentwicklung für Wohnen und Arbeiten im Salzburger Zentralraum. Land Salzburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[[28] Land Salzburg and Partners, eds. (2007a). GenderAlp! Spatial development for women and men. [Final publication]. Salzburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[[29] Land Salzburg, ed. (2007b). Living and working in Salzburg for women and men.Requirement oriented spatial planning. GenderAlp! best practice documentation. Retrieved from http://www.genderalp.com/IMG/pdf/82_Salzburg_planning_May_07-pr-eng.pdf, accessed: 5/10/2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[[30] Land Niederösterreich, ed., (2007). GenderAlp! Equality in in Lower Austrian Business parks. [Short report: Results and Recommendations]. St. Pölten: Land Niederösterreich..]Search in Google Scholar
[[31] Larsson, A. (2006). From equal opportunities to gender awareness in spatial planning.Town Planning Review 77(5), 509-530.10.3828/tpr.77.5.2]Search in Google Scholar
[[32] Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of Space. Oxford. Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[[33] Löw, M. (2001). Raumsoziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.]Search in Google Scholar
[[34] Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[[35] Oedl-Wieser, T., Gmeiner, P. & Machold, I. (2012). Politische Mitbestimmung von Frauen in ländlichen Regionen Österreichs, Fact Sheet Nr. 3, Wien: Bundesanstalt für Bergbauernfragen.]Search in Google Scholar
[[36] Roberts, M. (2013). Introduction: Concepts, Themes and Issues in a Gendered Approach to Planning. In Sanchez de Madariaga, I. & Roberts, M., eds, Fair Shared Cities.The Impact of Gender Planning in Europe (pp. 1-20). Farnham: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[[37] Roberts, M. (2006). A place for citizenship? Women, Urban Design and Neighbourhood planning. In Buckingham, S. & Lievesley, G., eds., In the Hands of Women: Paradigms of Citizenship (pp. 95-126). Manchester University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[[38] RTPI (Royal Town Planning Institute 2007). Gender and Spatial Planning. RTPI Good practice note 7. Online retrieved from http://www.rtpi.org.uk/knowledge/publications/goodpractice-notes/gpn-7-gender-and-spatial-planning/ - accessed 26/10/2012. ]Search in Google Scholar
[[39] SEMIGRA_a (2013). Selected Migration and Ubalanced Sex Ratio in Rural Regions.ESPON Targeted Analysis 2013/2/15. [Final Report] V. 30/06/12. Leipzig: Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography.]Search in Google Scholar
[[40] SEMIGRA_b (2013). Case Study Report Sachsen-Anhalt. [Annex 2 A / Version 28 June 2012]. Leipzig: Leibniz Institut für Regional Geography.]Search in Google Scholar
[[41] Soja, E. W. (2009). The city and spatial justice. Journal on Spatial Justice and Planning. 1(1), 31-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[[42] Statistik Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (2012). Der demografische Wandel in Mecklenburg- Vorpommern - Veränderung der Altersstruktur, demografische Alterung und Schrumpfung von 1982 bis 2007 Retrieved from: http://www.statistikmv.de/cms2/STAM_prod/STAM/_downloads/Bevoelkerung/2-Altersstruktur.pdf, accessed: 12/01/2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[[43] Theorizing and Practizing Gender Sensitive Planning in European Discourse (2013).Leibniz Universität Hannover.]Search in Google Scholar
[[44] Tummers, L. (2013). Spatial planning at work: a gendered perspective form the Netherlands. In Sanchez de Madariaga, I. & Roberts, M., eds, Fair Shared Cities.The Impact of Gender Planning in Europe (pp. 131-154). Farnham: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[[45] Tummers, L. (2010). To the heart of planning: is the hardware of spatial planning open to feminist alternatives? In Ernst W., ed., Geschlecht und Innovation. Gender Mainstreaming im Techno-Wissenschaftsbetrieb. Internationale Genderforschung in Niedersachsen (pp.117-136). Berlin: LIT-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[[46] Tummers, L. & Wankiewicz, H. (2009). Beyond the ‘women friendly-city’. Paper presented for the AESOP YA-conference “Planning as rear view mirror or Crystal Ball? - Diversities of Planning Cultures, Traditions Identities” in Vienna 12.02.2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[[47] Wankiewicz, H. (2013). European regional development programmes for cities and regions: Driving forces for gender planning? In Sanchez de Madariaga, I. & Roberts, M., eds, Fair Shared Cities. The Impact of Gender Planning in Europe (pp. 131-154). Farnham: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[[48] Wankiewicz, H., (2009). Are we really planning for people’s needs? Regions Magazine 274 (Suppl. 1,: 9-11). Doi: 10.1080/13673882.2009.1053.10.1080/13673882.2009.1053]Search in Google Scholar
[[49] Wankiewicz, H., & Schrenk, M., (2004). Raumanalyse Salzburger Zentralraum. Retrieved from http://planwind.at/publikationen/sp_zentralraum-endbericht.pdf. Accessed: 25/10/2012]Search in Google Scholar
[[50] Wotha, B. (2000). Gender Planning und Verwaltungshandeln. Umsetzung von Genderbelangen in räumliche Planung - unter Berücksichtigung von Verwaltungsmodernisierung und neuerer Tendenzen im Planungsbereich. Kiel: Kieler Arbeitspapiere zur Landeskunde und Raumordnung.]Search in Google Scholar
[[51] Zibell, B. (2006). Gender practice and criteria in Spatial Planning. GenderAlp! Salzburg Project. Short Version. Salzburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[[52] ZBG Zweckverband Großraum Braunschweig/ Universität Hannover (eds., 2005). Good Practices. Praxisbeispiele zum Thema Wohnen und Versorgung’ (Good practices in housing and supply). Braunschweig.]Search in Google Scholar
[DEMOCHANGE project - (en, it, slo, ge) www.demochange.org DEMOCHANGE Salzburg (ge) www.demochange.at GDUS - European Network on Gender and diversity und urban sustainability GDUS (2012) http://www.rali.boku.ac.at/gdus.html GenderAlp! Spatial development for women and men project: http://www.genderalp.at/ QUING - Quality in Gender+ Equality Policies - The Quing project: www.quing.eu SEMIGRA - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_TargetedAnalyses/semigra.html ]Search in Google Scholar
