Imagining subjective absence: Marcus on zombies

Alter, T. 2007. Does Representationalism Undermine the Knowledge Argument? In Phenomenal Knowledge and Phenomenal Concepts: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, T. Alter and S. Walter (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–76.Search in Google Scholar

Alter, T. Forthcoming. The Knowledge Argument. In the Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, S. Schneider and M. Velmans (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Ashwell, L. 2003. Conceivability and Modal Error. MA Thesis, University of Auckland.Search in Google Scholar

Balog, Katalin. 1999. Conceivability, Possibility, and the Mind-Body Problem. Philosophical Review 108: 497–528.Search in Google Scholar

Beaton, M. 2005. What RoboDennett Still Doesn’t Know. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12: 3–25.Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, David. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, David. 2002. Does Conceivability Entail Possibility? In Conceivability and Possibility, T. Gendler and J. Hawthorne (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–200.Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, David. 2003. The Content and Epistemology of Phenomenal Belief. In Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, Q. Smith and A. Jokic (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 220–72.Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. J. 2004. Phenomenal Concepts and the Knowledge Argument. In There’s Something about Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge Argument, P. Ludlow, D. Stoljar, and Y. Nagasawa (eds.). Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 269–98.Search in Google Scholar

Churchland, P. 1989. Knowing Qualia: A Reply to Jackson. From his A Neurocomputational Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 67–76.Search in Google Scholar

Hellie, Benj 2004. Inexpressible Truths and the Allure of the Knowledge Argument. In There’s Something about Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge Argument, P. Ludlow, Y. Nagasawa, and D. Stoljar (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 333–64.Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank 1982. Epiphenomenal Qualia. Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127–36.10.2307/2960077Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank 2003. Mind and Illusion. In Minds and Persons: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 53. A. O’Hear (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–71.10.1017/S1358246100008365Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, F. 2007. The Knowledge Argument, Diaphanousness, Representationalism. In Phenomenal Knowledge and Phenomenal Concepts: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, T. Alter and S. Walter (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–64.Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul 1972. Naming and Necessity. In The Semantics of Natural Language, G. Harman and D. Davidson (eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted as Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Search in Google Scholar

Marcus, Eric 2004. Why Zombies are Inconceivable. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82: 477–90.10.1080/713659880Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Farid Masrour. N.d. Are Zombies Positively Conceivable? University of Arizona manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Shoemaker, Sidney. 1975. Functionalism and Qualia. Philosophical Studies 27: 291–315.10.1007/BF01225748Open DOISearch in Google Scholar