This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Altshuler, R., & Grubert, H. (2010). Formula apportionment: Is it better than the current system and are there better alternatives? National Tax Journal, 63(4), 1145–1184.AltshulerR.GrubertH.2010Formula apportionment: Is it better than the current system and are there better alternatives?National Tax Journal6341145118410.17310/ntj.2010.4S.13Search in Google Scholar
Aspinwall, M. (2002). Preferring Europe. Ideology and national preferences on European integration. European Union Politics, 3(1), 81–111.AspinwallM.2002Preferring Europe. Ideology and national preferences on European integrationEuropean Union Politics318111110.1177/1465116502003001005Search in Google Scholar
Bertelsen, S. H. (2017). CCTB/CCCTB positions and ongoing processes. Confederation of Danish Industry. Retrieved from https://www.eu-skatteret.dk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/CCTB-CCCTB-positions-and-ondgoing-processes-in-countries-and-business.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020)BertelsenS. H.2017CCTB/CCCTB positions and ongoing processesConfederation of Danish Industry. Retrieved from https://www.eu-skatteret.dk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/CCTB-CCCTB-positions-and-ondgoing-processes-in-countries-and-business.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Bettendorf, L., Devereux, M., van der Horst, A., Loretz, S., & de Mooij, R. (2010). Corporate tax harmonization in the EU. Economic Policy, 25, 537–590.BettendorfL.DevereuxM.van der HorstA.LoretzS.de MooijR.2010Corporate tax harmonization in the EUEconomic Policy2553759010.1111/j.1468-0327.2010.00248.xSearch in Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of consent: Logical foundation of constitutional democracy. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.BuchananJ. M.TullockG.1962The Calculus of consent: Logical foundation of constitutional democracyIndianapolis, INLiberty FundSearch in Google Scholar
Ceuppens, S. (2015). CCCTB: Analysis of the voting behaviour of members of the European Parliament. Universteit Gent. Retrieved from https://lib.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/215/334/RUG01-002215334_2015_0001_AC.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)CeuppensS.2015CCCTB: Analysis of the voting behaviour of members of the European ParliamentUniversteit Gent. Retrieved from https://lib.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/215/334/RUG01-002215334_2015_0001_AC.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Cline, R., Neubig, T., Phillips, A., & Walsh, A. (2010). Study on the economic and budgetary impact of the introduction of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base in the European Union. Retrieved from http://estaticos.expansionpro.orbyt.es/estaticas/descargas/2011/02/informeeyoung.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)ClineR.NeubigT.PhillipsA.WalshA.2010Study on the economic and budgetary impact of the introduction of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base in the European UnionRetrieved from http://estaticos.expansionpro.orbyt.es/estaticas/descargas/2011/02/informeeyoung.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. (2017). Amendments 31 – 301. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECONAM-609575_EN.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020)Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs2017Amendments 31 – 301Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECONAM-609575_EN.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. (2018). Report on the proposal for a Council directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) (COM(2016)0683 – C8-0471/2016 – 2016/0336(CNS)). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0051_EN.html# (Accessed 24.03.2020)Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs2018Report on the proposal for a Council directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) (COM(2016)0683 – C8-0471/2016 – 2016/0336(CNS))Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0051_EN.html# (Accessed 24.03.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Committee on Legal Affairs. (2017). Amendments 16 – 45. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-604719_EN.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020)Committee on Legal Affairs2017Amendments 16 – 45Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-604719_EN.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. (2016). Council directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/ (Accessed 24.03.2020)Council of the European Union2016Council directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/ (Accessed 24.03.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. (2018). Common consolidated corporate tax base. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/ccctb/ (Accessed 24.03.2020)Council of the European Union2018Common consolidated corporate tax baseRetrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/ccctb/ (Accessed 24.03.2020)Search in Google Scholar
De Lange, E., Hayes, B., & Hoekmark, G. (2018). The great EU corporate tax lie. Retrieved from https://euobserver.com/opinion/141092 (Accessed 24.03.2020)De LangeE.HayesB.HoekmarkG.2018The great EU corporate tax lieRetrieved from https://euobserver.com/opinion/141092 (Accessed 24.03.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Devereux, M. P., & Loretz, S. (2008). The effects of EU formula apportionment on corporate tax revenues. Fiscal Studies, 29(1), 1–33.DevereuxM. P.LoretzS.2008The effects of EU formula apportionment on corporate tax revenuesFiscal Studies29113310.1111/j.1475-5890.2008.00067.xSearch in Google Scholar
Eggert, W., & Schjelderup, G. (2003). Symmetric tax competition and formula apportionment. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 5(2), 439–446.EggertW.SchjelderupG.2003Symmetric tax competition and formula apportionmentJournal of Public Economic Theory5243944610.1111/1467-9779.00141Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. (2011). Questions and answers on the CCCTB. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-11-171_en.htm (Accessed 24.03.2020)European Commission2011Questions and answers on the CCCTBRetrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-11-171_en.htm (Accessed 24.03.2020)Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. (2016a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Building a fair, competitive and stable corporate tax system for the EU. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF (Accessed 24.03.2020).European Commission2016aCommunication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the CouncilBuilding a fair, competitive and stable corporate tax system for the EU. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF (Accessed 24.03.2020).Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. (2016b). Impact assessment accompanying the document proposals for a Council Directive on a CCTB and CCCTB. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/swd_2016_341_en.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)European Commission2016bImpact assessment accompanying the document proposals for a Council Directive on a CCTB and CCCTBRetrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/swd_2016_341_en.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)Search in Google Scholar
European Parliament. (2018a). Briefing: Common Corporate Tax Base (CCTB). Member's Research Service.European Parliament2018aBriefing: Common Corporate Tax Base (CCTB)Member's Research ServiceSearch in Google Scholar
European Parliament. (2018b). Briefing: Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). European Parliamentary Research Service.European Parliament2018bBriefing: Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)European Parliamentary Research ServiceSearch in Google Scholar
European Parliament. (2018c). Parlemeter 2018 – Taking up the challenge: From (silent) support to actual vote. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/en/be-heard/eurobarometer/parlemeter-2018-taking-up-the-challenge (Accessed 31.05.2020)European Parliament2018cParlemeter 2018 – Taking up the challenge: From (silent) support to actual voteRetrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/en/be-heard/eurobarometer/parlemeter-2018-taking-up-the-challenge (Accessed 31.05.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Faas, T. (2003). To defect or not to defect? National, institutional and party group pressures on MEPs and their consequences for party group. European Journal of Political Research, 42, 841–866.FaasT.2003To defect or not to defect? National, institutional and party group pressures on MEPs and their consequences for party groupEuropean Journal of Political Research4284186610.1111/1475-6765.00106Search in Google Scholar
Fuest, C., Hemmelgarn, T., & Ramb, F. (2007). How would the introduction of an EU-wide formula apportionment affect the distribution and size of the corporate tax base? An analysis based on German multinationals. International Tax and Public Finance, 14(5), 605–626.FuestC.HemmelgarnT.RambF.2007How would the introduction of an EU-wide formula apportionment affect the distribution and size of the corporate tax base? An analysis based on German multinationalsInternational Tax and Public Finance14560562610.1007/s10797-006-9008-6Search in Google Scholar
Giger, N. (2009). Towards a modern gender gap in Europe? A comparative analysis of voting behavior in 12 countries. The Social Science Journal, 46, 474–492.GigerN.2009Towards a modern gender gap in Europe? A comparative analysis of voting behavior in 12 countriesThe Social Science Journal4647449210.1016/j.soscij.2009.03.002Search in Google Scholar
Heinemann, F., Mohl, P., & Osterloh, S. (2009). Who's afraid of an EU tax and why? — revenue system preferences in the European Parliament. The Review of International Organizations, 4(1), 73–99.HeinemannF.MohlP.OsterlohS.2009Who's afraid of an EU tax and why? — revenue system preferences in the European ParliamentThe Review of International Organizations41739910.1007/s11558-008-9046-1Search in Google Scholar
Hellerstein, W. (2019). The transformation of the state corporate income tax into market based levy. Journal of Taxation, 130(5), 4–20.HellersteinW.2019The transformation of the state corporate income tax into market based levyJournal of Taxation1305420Search in Google Scholar
Hellerstein, W., & McLure, C. (2004). The European Commission's report on company income taxation: What the EU can learn from the experience of the US States. International Tax and Public Finance, 11, 199–220.HellersteinW.McLureC.2004The European Commission's report on company income taxation: What the EU can learn from the experience of the US StatesInternational Tax and Public Finance1119922010.1023/B:ITAX.0000011400.45314.57Search in Google Scholar
Hines, J. R. (2009). Income misatribution under formula apportionment. NBER Working Paper Series, 15185.HinesJ. R.2009Income misatribution under formula apportionmentNBER Working Paper Series, 15185.10.3386/w15185Search in Google Scholar
Hix, S., & Noury, A. (2009). After enlargement: Voting patterns in the sixth European Parliaments. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34(2), 159–174.HixS.NouryA.2009After enlargement: Voting patterns in the sixth European ParliamentsLegislative Studies Quarterly34215917410.3162/036298009788314282Search in Google Scholar
Iwin-Garzyńska, J. (2012). Opodatkowanie kosztu długu przedsiębiorstwa a koncepcja wspólnej skonsolidowanej podstawy opodatkowania. Finanse w niestabilnym otoczeniu -dylematy i wyzwania, 89–97.Iwin-GarzyńskaJ.2012Opodatkowanie kosztu długu przedsiębiorstwa a koncepcja wspólnej skonsolidowanej podstawy opodatkowaniaFinanse w niestabilnym otoczeniu -dylematy i wyzwania,8997Search in Google Scholar
Krchniva, K. (2014). Comparison of European, Canadian and U.S. Formula apportionment on real data. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 309–318.KrchnivaK.2014Comparison of European, Canadian and U.S. Formula apportionment on real dataProcedia Economics and Finance1230931810.1016/S2212-5671(14)00350-5Search in Google Scholar
Kudła, J. (2013). Ekonomia Opodatkowania Międzynarodowego (pp. 323–331). Warszawa, Poland: Difin SA.KudłaJ.2013Ekonomia Opodatkowania Międzynarodowego323331Warszawa, PolandDifin SASearch in Google Scholar
Kutarba, M. (2011). Polska może stracić na wspólnej podstawie podatkowej. Retrieved from http://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/forma/debata/polskamoze-stracic-na-wspolnej-podstawie-podatkowej/ (Accessed 24.03.2020)KutarbaM.2011Polska może stracić na wspólnej podstawie podatkowejRetrieved from http://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/forma/debata/polskamoze-stracic-na-wspolnej-podstawie-podatkowej/ (Accessed 24.03.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Marceau, N., Mongrain, S., & Wilson, J. (2010). Why do most countries set high tax rates on capital? Journal of International Economics, 80, 249–259.MarceauN.MongrainS.WilsonJ.2010Why do most countries set high tax rates on capital?Journal of International Economics8024925910.1016/j.jinteco.2009.09.002Search in Google Scholar
Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–989.MarksG.WilsonC. J.2002Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies35896598910.1177/001041402236310Search in Google Scholar
Mcelroy, G., & Benoit, K. (2011). Policy positioning in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 13(1), 150–167.McelroyG.BenoitK.2011Policy positioning in the European ParliamentEuropean Union Politics13115016710.1177/1465116511416680Search in Google Scholar
Nogueira, C. G., & Veiga, L. G. (2010). Economic determinants of citizens’ support for the Europe Union. Documentos de Trabalho Working Paper Series.NogueiraC. G.VeigaL. G.2010Economic determinants of citizens’ support for the Europe UnionDocumentos de Trabalho Working Paper Series.Search in Google Scholar
Orłowski, W. M. (2008). Propozycja Wspólnej Skonsolidowanej Bazy CIT – wpływ na polską gospodarkę. Warszawa. Retrieved from http://www.pte.pl/pliki/2/1/w_orlowski_cit.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020).OrłowskiW. M.2008Propozycja Wspólnej Skonsolidowanej Bazy CIT – wpływ na polską gospodarkęWarszawa. Retrieved from http://www.pte.pl/pliki/2/1/w_orlowski_cit.pdf (Accessed 24.03.2020).Search in Google Scholar
Pethig, R., & Wagener, A. (2007). Profit tax competition and formula apportionment. International Tax and Public Finance, 14, 631–655.PethigR.WagenerA.2007Profit tax competition and formula apportionmentInternational Tax and Public Finance1463165510.1007/s10797-006-9017-5Search in Google Scholar
Roggeman, A., Verleyen, I., Van Cauwenberge, P., & Coppens, C. (2015). Did the economic impact of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) affect the voting behaviour of the members of the European Parliament? De Economist, 163, 1–23.RoggemanA.VerleyenI.Van CauwenbergeP.CoppensC.2015Did the economic impact of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) affect the voting behaviour of the members of the European Parliament?De Economist16312310.1007/s10645-014-9238-4Search in Google Scholar
Selck, T. J. (2006). Preferences and procedures: European Union legislative decision-making. Dordrecht: Springer.SelckT. J.2006Preferences and procedures: European Union legislative decision-makingDordrechtSpringer10.1007/0-387-27554-1Search in Google Scholar
Spengel, C., Ortmann-Babel, M., Zinn, B., & Matenaer, S. (2012). A common corporate tax base for Europe: An impact assessment of the draft Council directive on a CC(C)TB. Centre for European Economic Research, (12–039). Retrieved from http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp12039.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)SpengelC.Ortmann-BabelM.ZinnB.MatenaerS.2012A common corporate tax base for Europe: An impact assessment of the draft Council directive on a CC(C)TBCentre for European Economic Research12039Retrieved from http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp12039.pdf (Accessed 31.05.2020)10.2139/ssrn.2105622Search in Google Scholar
University of Portsmouth. (2013). Module 2: Understanding EU policy making. Retrieved from http://hum.port.ac.uk/europeanstudieshub/learning/module-2-understanding-eu-policy-making/ (Accessed 29.06.2020)University of Portsmouth2013Module 2: Understanding EU policy makingRetrieved from http://hum.port.ac.uk/europeanstudieshub/learning/module-2-understanding-eu-policy-making/ (Accessed 29.06.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Vella, M. (2018). Malta braces itself for MEPs’ vote on common corporate tax. Retrieved from https://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/europe/85199/malta_taxation_corporate_ccctb_brussels_european_parliament#.XGHyeTNKiUk (Accessed 24.03.2020)VellaM.2018Malta braces itself for MEPs’ vote on common corporate taxRetrieved from https://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/europe/85199/malta_taxation_corporate_ccctb_brussels_european_parliament#.XGHyeTNKiUk (Accessed 24.03.2020)Search in Google Scholar
VoteWatch Europe. (2018). Common consolidated corporate tax base. Retrieved from https://www.votewatch.eu/en/term8-common-consolidated-corporate-tax-base-draft-legislative-resolution-vote-commission-proposal-consult.html (Accessed 24.03.2020)VoteWatch Europe2018Common consolidated corporate tax baseRetrieved from https://www.votewatch.eu/en/term8-common-consolidated-corporate-tax-base-draft-legislative-resolution-vote-commission-proposal-consult.html (Accessed 24.03.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Zodrow, G., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356–370.ZodrowG.MieszkowskiP.1986Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of public goodsJournal of Urban Economics1935637010.1142/9789811205149_0017Search in Google Scholar
