[Brown, P., de Souza, P.V., Mercer, R.L., Pietra, V.J.D. and Lai, J.C. (1992). Class-based n-gram models of natural language, Computational Linguistics 18(1): 467-479.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brychcin, T. and Konopik, M. (2011). Morphological based language models for inflectional languages, Proceedings ofthe 6th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent DataAcquisition and Advanced Computing Systems, Praque,Czech Republic, pp. 560-563.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, S. and Goodman, S. (1999). An empirical study of smoothing techniques for language modeling, ComputerSpeech and Language 1(13): 359-394.10.1006/csla.1999.0128]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, Y. and Chan, K. (2003). Extended multi-word trigger pair language model using data mining technique, Systems,Man and Cybernetics 1(1): 262-267.]Search in Google Scholar
[Devine, E., Gaehde, S. and Curtis, A. (2007). Comparative evaluation of three continuous speech recognition software packages in the generation of medical reports, Journal ofAmerican Medical Informatics Association 1(7): 462-468.10.1136/jamia.2000.0070462]Search in Google Scholar
[Gale, A. and Sampson, G. (1995). Good-Turing frequency estimation without tears, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics2(1): 217-239.10.1080/09296179508590051]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodman, J. (2001). A bit of progress in language modeling extended version, Technical Report MSR-TR-2001-72, Machine Learning and Applied Statistics Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Iyer, R. and Ostendorf, M. (1999). Modeling long distance dependence in language: Topic mixtures versus dynamic cache models, IEEE Transactions on Speech and AudioProcessing 7(1): 30-39.10.1109/89.736328]Search in Google Scholar
[Jelinek, F., Merialdo, B., Roukos, S. and Strauss, M. (2001). A dynamic language model for speech recognition, Proceedingsof the Workshop on Speech and Natural Language,HLT’91, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, pp. 293-295.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jurafsky, D. and Matrin, J. (2009). Speech and Language Processing. An Introduction to Natural Language Processing,Computational Linguistics and Speech Recognition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kasprzak, W., Wilkowski, A. and Czapnik, K. (2012). Hand gesture recognition based on free-form contours and probabilistic inference, International Journal of AppliedMathematics and Computer Science 22(2): 437-448, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-012-0033-6.10.2478/v10006-012-0033-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Katz, S. (1987). Estimation of probabilities from sparse data for the language model component of a speech recognizer, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing35(3): 400-401.10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165125]Search in Google Scholar
[Koehn, P. (2005). Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation, MIT Summit 2005, Phuket, Thailand, pp. 79-86.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kolorenc, J., Nouza, J. and Cerva, P. (2006). Multi-words in the Czech TV and radio news transcription system, Proceedingsof SPECOM 2006, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 70-74.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, A., Kawahara, T. and Shikano, K. (2001). Julius-an open source real-time large vocabulary recognition engine, Proceedingsof the European Conference on Speech Communicationand Technology (EUROSPEECH), Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 1691-1694.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mauces, M., Rotownik, T. and Zemljak, M. (2003). Modelling highly inflected Slovenian language, International Journalof Speech Technology 1(6): 254-257.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikolov, T., Deoras, A., Kombrink, S., Burget, L. and Cernocky, J. (2011). Empirical evaluation and combination of advanced language modeling techniques, INTERSPEECH,ISCA, Florence, Italy, pp. 605-608.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niesler, T., Whittaker, E.W.D. and Woodland, P. (1998). Comparison of part-of-speech and automatically derived category-based language models for speech recognition, Proceedings of ICASSP 98, Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 177-180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piasecki, M. (2007). Polish tagger TaKIPI: Rule based construction and optimisation, Task Quarterly11(1): 151-167.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piasecki, M. and Broda, B. (2007). Correction of medical handwriting OCR based on semantic similarity, in H. Yin, P. Tino, E. Corchado, W. Byrne and X. Yao (Eds.), IntelligentData Engineering and Automated Learning-IDEAL2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4881, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 437-446.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piasecki, M. and Radziszewski, A. (2008). Morphological prediction for Polish by a statistical a tergo index, SystemsScience 34(4): 7-17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarukkai, R. and Ballard, D. (1996). Word set probability boosting for improved spontaneous dialogue recognition. The ab and tab algorithms, Technical Report TR-601, University of Rochester, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sas, J. (2009). Optimal spoken dialog control in hands-free medical information systems, Journal of Medical Informaticsand Technologies 13: 113-120.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sas, J. (2010). Application of local bidirectional language model to error correction in Polish medical speech recognition, Journal of Medical Informatics and Technologies15(1): 127-134.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sas, J. and Żołnierek, A. (2011). Distant co-occurrence language model for ASR in loose word order languages, Proceedingsof the International Conference on Computer RecognitionSystems Cores 2011, Wrocław, Poland, pp. 767-778. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Vaiciunas, A., Kaminskas, V. and Raskinis, G. (2004).Statistical language models of Lithuanian based on word clustering and morphological decomposition, Informatica15(4): 565-580.10.15388/Informatica.2004.079]Search in Google Scholar
[Ward, W. and Issar, S. (1996). A class based language model for speech recognition, Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,ICASSP 96, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 416-418.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whittaker, E. and Woodland, P. (2003). Language modelling for Russian and English using words and classes, ComputerSpeech and Language 17(1): 87-104.10.1016/S0885-2308(02)00047-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Woliński, M. (2006). Morfeusz-a practical tool for the morphological analysis of Polish, Inteligent Processingand Web Mining: IIPWM06, Ustro´n, Poland, pp. 503-512.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wózniak, M. and Krawczyk, B. (2012). Combined classifier based on feature space partitioning, International Journalof Applied Mathematics and Computer Science22(4): 855-866, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-012-0063-0.10.2478/v10006-012-0063-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Young, S. and Everman, G. (2009). The HTK Book (for HTKVersion 3.4), Cambridge University, Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zółko, B., Skurzok, D. and Ziółko, M. (2010). Word n-grams for Polish, Proceedings of the 10th IASTED InternationalConference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications(AIA 2010), Innsbruck, Austria, pp. 197-201.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ziółko, J., Gałka, J., Jadczyk, T., Skurzok, D. and Masior, M. (2011). Automatic speech recognition system dedicated for Polish, Proceedings of the INTERSPEECH 2011 Conference,Florence, Italy, pp. 3315-3316.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ziółko, J., Gałka, J. and Skurzok, D. (2010). Speech modelling using phoneme segmentation and modified weighted Levenshtein distance, Proceedings of the ICALP2010 Colloquium,Bordeaux, France, pp. 743-746. ]Search in Google Scholar