<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>At the time of writing in June 2015, the top Swedish tabloid editors, Thomas Mattsson and Jan Helin, Editors-in-Chief for the competing news organisations, <italic>Expressen</italic> and <italic>Aftonbladet</italic>, have produced 116 weekly issues of their joint podcast “MattssonHelin”. An examination of 24 samples of the content regarding responses to media criticism shows that the responses can be categorised in eleven groups that range from total rejection to total acceptance. Our categorisation presents a complement to earlier research on media responses to criticism. The responses contain elements of paradigm repair for journalism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="j_nor-2016-0042_ref_006_w2aab2b8c23b1b7b1ab2ab6Aa">Berkowitz 2000</xref>) but also illuminate how the editors use the particular advantages of the podcast format to enhance their take on public media literacy. Their presence in this particular digital platform allows for long and nuanced discussions on journalistic practice in relation to media criticism, albeit on their own terms.</p></abstract>

At the time of writing in June 2015, the top Swedish tabloid editors, Thomas Mattsson and Jan Helin, Editors-in-Chief for the competing news organisations, Expressen and Aftonbladet, have produced 116 weekly issues of their joint podcast “MattssonHelin”. An examination of 24 samples of the content regarding responses to media criticism shows that the responses can be categorised in eleven groups that range from total rejection to total acceptance. Our categorisation presents a complement to earlier research on media responses to criticism. The responses contain elements of paradigm repair for journalism (Berkowitz 2000) but also illuminate how the editors use the particular advantages of the podcast format to enhance their take on public media literacy. Their presence in this particular digital platform allows for long and nuanced discussions on journalistic practice in relation to media criticism, albeit on their own terms.

Media Responses to Media Criticism

Nordicom Review

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

An Analysis of Response Practices in the Weekly Swedish Podcast MattssonHelin

At the time of writing in June 2015, the top Swedish tabloid editors, Thomas Mattsson and Jan Helin, Editors-in-Chief for the competing news organisations,...

Media Responses to Media Criticism

Online veröffentlicht: 15. Juni 2017

Seitenbereich: 47 - 64

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0042

Schlüsselwörter
media criticism, media accountability, response strategies, paradigm repair, image restoration theory, crisis communication

© 2017 Torbjörn Von Krogh et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Media Responses to Media Criticism

Online veröffentlicht: 15. Juni 2017

Seitenbereich: 47 - 64

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0042

Schlüsselwörtermedia criticism, media accountability, response strategies, paradigm repair, image restoration theory, crisis communication

© 2017 Torbjörn Von Krogh et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
media criticism, media accountability, response strategies, paradigm repair, image restoration theory, crisis communication