<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We present a critical perspective of the current state of development of CSE and SI as fields of study and practice based on a geographical and conceptual mapping of the actors involved in the two fields. Although these concepts are set into motion by different forces on different paths, they converge towards a common apprehension of social business. CSE has no supporting core and it offers scarce and scattered resources for identity formation, while SI benefits from practitioners’ attention and is thus developing as a proper field of study. Using this knowledge we anticipate what the future holds for these concepts and offer valuable insights for interested practitioners and academics.</p></abstract>

We present a critical perspective of the current state of development of CSE and SI as fields of study and practice based on a geographical and conceptual mapping of the actors involved in the two fields. Although these concepts are set into motion by different forces on different paths, they converge towards a common apprehension of social business. CSE has no supporting core and it offers scarce and scattered resources for identity formation, while SI benefits from practitioners’ attention and is thus developing as a proper field of study. Using this knowledge we anticipate what the future holds for these concepts and offer valuable insights for interested practitioners and academics.

Corporate social entrepreneurship versus social intrapreneurship: same idea, different trajectories ?

The Bucharest University of Economic Studies

The Bucharest University of Economic Studies Bucharest

Management & Marketing

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

We present a critical perspective of the current state of development of CSE and SI as fields of study and practice based on a geographical and conceptual...

Corporate social entrepreneurship versus social intrapreneurship: same idea, different trajectories ?

Online veröffentlicht: 22. Aug. 2017

Seitenbereich: 252 - 276

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2017-0016

Schlüsselwörter
social entrepreneurship, social intrapreneurship, corporate social entrepreneurship, social entrepreneur, social intrapreneur

© 2017 Shahrazad Hadad et al., published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Corporate social entrepreneurship versus social intrapreneurship: same idea, different trajectories ?

Online veröffentlicht: 22. Aug. 2017

Seitenbereich: 252 - 276

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2017-0016

Schlüsselwörtersocial entrepreneurship, social intrapreneurship, corporate social entrepreneurship, social entrepreneur, social intrapreneur

© 2017 Shahrazad Hadad et al., published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
social entrepreneurship, social intrapreneurship, corporate social entrepreneurship, social entrepreneur, social intrapreneur