[Aarts, Bas, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech and Sean Wallis (eds.). 2013. The verb phrase in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139060998]Search in Google Scholar
[Biewer, Carolin. 2011. Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective. In J. Mukherjee and M. Hundt (eds.), 7–33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bongartz, Christiane M. and Sarah Buschfeld. 2011. English in Cyprus: Second language variety or learner English? In J. Mukherjee and M. Hundt (eds.), 35–54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brinton, Laurel J. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems: Aspectualizers and post-verbal particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Collins, Peter. 2008. The progressive aspect in World Englishes: A corpus-based study. Australian Journal of Linguistics 28 (2): 225–249.10.1080/07268600802308782]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Crawley, Michael J. 2007. The R book. Chichester: Wiley.10.1002/9780470515075]Search in Google Scholar
[Deshors, Sandra C. 2014. A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach. English World-Wide 35 (3): 277–305.10.1075/eww.35.3.02des]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Deshors, Sandra. C. 2017. Zooming in on verbs in the progressive: A collostructional and correspondence analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 45 (3): 260–290.10.1177/0075424217717589]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Deshors, Sandra C., Sandra Götz and Samantha Laporte. 2016. Linguistic innovations in EFL and ESL: Rethinking the linguistic creativity of non-native English speakers. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2 (2): 131–150.10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.01des]Search in Google Scholar
[Divjak, Dagmar and Stefan Th. Gries. 2006. Ways of trying in Russian: Clustering behavioral profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2 (1): 23–60.10.1515/CLLT.2006.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Divjak, Dagmar S. and Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. Corpus-based cognitive semantics: A contrastive study of phrasal verbs in English and Russian. In K. Dziwirek and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.). Studies in cognitive corpus linguistics, 273–296. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague's PTQ. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, Sandra A. Thompson, Robert Englebretson and Nii Martey. 2000–2005. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Parts 1–4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.]Search in Google Scholar
[Edwards, Alison. 2014. The progressive aspect in the Netherlands and the ESL/EFL continuum. World Englishes 33 (2): 173–194.10.1111/weng.12080]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Edwards, Alison. 2016. English in the Netherlands: Functions, forms and attitudes. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g56]Search in Google Scholar
[Edwards, Alison and Samantha Laporte. 2015. Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes: The competing roles of norm orientation and proficiency levels. English World-Wide 36 (2): 135–169.10.1075/eww.36.2.01edw]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2015. At the interface of contact linguistics and second language acquisition research: New Englishes and Learner Englishes compared. English World-Wide 36 (1): 91–124.10.1075/eww.36.1.05gil]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, Sylvie De Cock and Sylviane Granger (eds.). 2010. The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage: Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilquin, Gaëtanelle and Sylviane Granger. 2011. From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. In J. Mukherjee and M. Hundt (eds.), 55–78.]Search in Google Scholar
[Götz, Sandra and Marco Schilk. 2011. Formulaic sequences in spoken ENL, ESL and EFL: Focus on British English, Indian English and learner English of advanced German learners. In J. Mukherjee and M. Hundt (eds.), 79–100.]Search in Google Scholar
[Granger, Sylviane, Estelle Dagneaux, Fanny Meunier and Magali Paquot (eds.). 2009. The International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2. Handbook and CD-Rom. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenbaum, Sydney. 1991. The development of the International Corpus of English. In K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg and J. Svartvik (eds.). English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik, 83–91. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gries, Stefan Th. 2009. Statistics for linguists with R: A practical introduction. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gries, Stefan Th. and Sandra C. Deshors. 2015. EFL and/vs. ESL? A multi-level regression modeling perspective on bridging the paradigm gap. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1 (1): 130–159.10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.05gri]Search in Google Scholar
[Gut, Ulrike and Robert Fuchs. 2013. Progressive aspect in Nigerian English. Journal of English Linguistics 41 (3): 243–267.10.1177/0075424213492799]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Harrell, Frank E. 2001. Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Hundt, Marianne. 2004. Animacy, agency and the spread of the progressive in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century English. English Language and Linguistics 8 (1): 47–69.10.1017/S1360674304001248]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hundt, Marianne and Joybrato Mukherjee. 2011. Introduction: Bridging a paradigm gap. In J. Mukherjee and M. Hundt (eds.), 1–5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hundt, Marianne and Katrin Vogel. 2011. Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes: Fact or fiction? In J. Mukherjee and M. Hundt (eds.), 145–165.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kachru, Braj B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk and H.G. Widdowson (eds.). English in the world. Teaching and learning the language and literature, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kranich, Svenja. 2010. The progressive in Modern English: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization and related changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789042031449]Search in Google Scholar
[Laitinen, Mikko. (Forthcoming). Placing ELF among the varieties of English: Some observation from typological profiling. In S. C. Deshors (ed.). Modeling World Englishes: Assessing the interplay of emancipation and globalization of ESL varieties. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laitinen, Mikko and Magnus Levin. 2016. On the globalization of English: Observations of subjective progressives in present-day Englishes. In E. Seoane and C. Suárez-Gómez (eds.). World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations, 229–252. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g57.10lai]Search in Google Scholar
[Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511642210]Search in Google Scholar
[Mair, Christian. 2013. The World System of Englishes: Accounting for the transnational importance of mobile and mediated vernaculars. English World-Wide 34(3): 253–278.10.1075/eww.34.3.01mai]Search in Google Scholar
[Meriläinen, Lea and Heli Paulasto. 2017. Embedded inversion as an angloversal: Evidence from Inner, Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes. In M. Filppula, J. Klemola and D. Sharma (eds.). The Oxford handbook of World Englishes, 676–696. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meriläinen, Lea, Heli Paulasto and Paula Rautionaho. 2017. Extended uses of the progressive form in Inner, Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes. In M. Filppula, J. Klemola, A. Mauranen and S. Vetchinnikova (eds.). Changing English: Global and local perspectives, 191–216. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110429657-011]Search in Google Scholar
[Mesthrie, Rajend and Rakesh M. Bhatt. 2008. World Englishes: The study of new linguistic varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791321]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mukherjee, Joybrato and Marianne Hundt (eds.). 2011. Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging the paradigm gap. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.44]Search in Google Scholar
[Rautionaho, Paula. 2014. Variation in the progressive: A corpus-based study into World Englishes. Tampere: Tampere University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rautionaho, Paula and Sandra C. Deshors. (Forthcoming.) Progressive or not progressive?: Modeling the constructional choices of EFL and ESL writers. To appear in International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, a special issue “Tense and aspect in learner language: Issues and advances in the use of language corpora”.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salles Bernal, Soluna. 2015. Synchronic analysis of the progressive aspect in three varieties of Asian Englishes. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies 51: 87–107.10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20157179]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, Edgar. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618901]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, Gerold and Marianne Hundt. 2012. “Off with their heads”: Profiling TAM in ICE corpora. In M. Hundt and U. Gut (eds.). Mapping unity and diversity World-Wide: Corpus-based studies of New Englishes, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/veaw.g43.01sch]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharma, Devyani. 2009. Typological diversity in New Englishes. English World-Wide 30 (2): 170–195.10.1075/eww.30.2.04sha]Search in Google Scholar
[Smitterberg, Erik. 2005. The progressive in 19th-century English: A process of integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004333086]Search in Google Scholar
[Strang, Barbara M.H. 1982. Some aspects of the history of the be + ing construction. In J. Anderson (ed.). Language form and linguistic variation: Papers dedicated to Angus McIntosh, 427–474. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.15.22str]Search in Google Scholar
[Suzuki, Ryota and Hidetoshi Shimodaira. 2011. Hierarchical clustering with Pvalues via multiscale bootstrap resampling. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pvclust/pvclust.pdf > (accessed June 27, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt and Bernd Kortmann. 2011. Typological profiling: Learner Englishes versus indigenized L2 varieties of English. In J. Mukherjee and M. Hundt (eds.), 167–187.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Rooy, Bertus. 2006. The extension of the progressive aspect in Black South African English. World Englishes 25 (1): 37–64.10.1111/j.0083-2919.2006.00446.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Rooy, Bertus. 2010. Social and linguistic perspectives on variability in World Englishes. World Englishes 29 (1): 3–20.10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01621.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Rooy, Bertus. 2011. A principled distinction between error and conventionalized innovation in African Englishes. In J. Mukherjee and M. Hundt (eds.), 189–207.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Rooy, Bertus 2014. Progressive aspect and stative verbs in Outer Circle varieties. World Englishes 33 (2): 157–172.10.1111/weng.12079]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Rooy, Bertus and Caroline Piotrowska. 2015. The development of an extended time period meaning of the progressive in Black South African English. In P. Collins (ed.). Grammatical change in English world-wide, 465–483. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/scl.67.19roo]Search in Google Scholar
[Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2): 143–160.10.2307/2182371]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Williams, Jessica. 1987. Non-native varieties of English: A special case of language acquisition. English World-Wide 8(2): 161–199.10.1075/eww.8.2.02wil]Search in Google Scholar