<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Research into and diagnosis of environmental change prior to the introduction of bioindicator methods were linked primarily to apparatus. Drawing attention to the reactions of organisms sensitive to that change and using them in environmental quality control have opened new opportunities for development of a new scientific discipline, known in the literature as bioindication. Bioindication combines several scientific disciplines, including biology, broadly conceived geography, and chemistry. It thus combines in a comprehensible manner apparatus-derived measurements (chemical analysis results) and areas of bioindicator exposure (situation and distance from the emitter), translating these parameters into bioindicators' anatomical and morphological reactions. The development of bioindicator methods progresses rapidly, and - as is usually the case under such circumstances - it is difficult to ensure that they are transparent and that no chaos ensues. In view of the above, it seems necessary to embark on a discussion of these issues and consider compiling lists of most applicable indicator organisms for examination of particular environmental toxins in particular environments.</p></abstract>

Research into and diagnosis of environmental change prior to the introduction of bioindicator methods were linked primarily to apparatus. Drawing attention to the reactions of organisms sensitive to that change and using them in environmental quality control have opened new opportunities for development of a new scientific discipline, known in the literature as bioindication. Bioindication combines several scientific disciplines, including biology, broadly conceived geography, and chemistry. It thus combines in a comprehensible manner apparatus-derived measurements (chemical analysis results) and areas of bioindicator exposure (situation and distance from the emitter), translating these parameters into bioindicators' anatomical and morphological reactions. The development of bioindicator methods progresses rapidly, and - as is usually the case under such circumstances - it is difficult to ensure that they are transparent and that no chaos ensues. In view of the above, it seems necessary to embark on a discussion of these issues and consider compiling lists of most applicable indicator organisms for examination of particular environmental toxins in particular environments.

Bioindication as challenge in Modern Environmental Protection

Department of Environment Protection and Modelling, Jan Kochanowski University, ul. Świętokrzyska 15, 25-406 Kielce, Poland, phone +48 41 349 64 27, fax +48 41 349 64 18

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Bioindication as challenge in Modern Environmental Protection"}

Research into and diagnosis of environmental change prior to the introduction of bioindicator methods were linked primarily to apparatus. Drawing attention to...

Bioindication as challenge in Modern Environmental Protection

Online veröffentlicht: 02. Feb. 2015

Seitenbereich: 577 - 591

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2014-0041

Schlüsselwörter
environmental pollution, bioindicators, bioindication research, bioindication methods

© 2015 Jóźwiak et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Bioindication as challenge in Modern Environmental Protection

Online veröffentlicht: 02. Feb. 2015

Seitenbereich: 577 - 591

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2014-0041

Schlüsselwörterenvironmental pollution, bioindicators, bioindication research, bioindication methods

© 2015 Jóźwiak et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
environmental pollution, bioindicators, bioindication research, bioindication methods