[1. Choi, Jonathan H. “Early Release in International Criminal Law.” Yale Law Journal 6 (123): 1784–1828.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. European Committee on Crime Problems, Council for Penological Cooperation. “Dangerous Offenders Country Survey.” PC-CP (2010) 04 (March 15, 2010) // http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/prisons/PCCP%20documents%202010/PC-CP(2010)04_E%20_Dangerous%20Offenders%20per%20Country.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Holá, Barbora, and Joris van Wijk. “Life after Conviction at International Criminal Tribunals: An Empirical Overview.” J Int. Criminal Justice 12 (1) (2014): 109–132.10.1093/jicj/mqu003]Search in Google Scholar
[4. “Intervention in the Council for Penological Co-Operation.” Fourth Plenary Meeting (November 5, 2014) // http://www.coe.int/t/DGHL/STANDARDSETTING/PRISONS/PCCP%20documents%202014/CEDH%20intervention%20PCCP%20plenary%20November%202014.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. “Malawi: Mission on Prisons and Conditions of Detention, 2001” // http://www.achpr.org/states/malawi/missions/prisons-2001/.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Mujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira. “The Conditional Early Release of Offenders Transferred from the Special Court for Sierra Leone to Serve Their Sentences in Designated States: Some Observations and Recommendations.” African Yearbook on International Humanitarian Law (2014): 154–170.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. “Namibia: Mission on Prisons and Conditions of Detention – 2001” // http://www.achpr.org/states/namibia/missions/prisons-2001/.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Nowak, Manfred. “U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary” (1993): 191–192.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. “Report to the Bulgarian Government on the visit to Bulgaria carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 15 to 19 December 2008.” CPT/Inf (2010) 29.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. “Report to the Bulgarian Government on the visit to Bulgaria carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 4 to 10 May 2012.” CPT/Inf (2012) 32.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Zyl Smit, Dirk van, Pete Weatherby, and Simon Creighton. “Whole Life Sentences and the Tide of European Human Rights Jurisprudence: What Is to Be Done?” Human Rights Law Review 14 (2014): 59–84.10.1093/hrlr/ngt046]Search in Google Scholar
[1. Arvydas Živulinskas v Lithuania. Application no. 34096/02 (December 12, 2006).]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Aswat v The United Kingdom. Application no. 17299/12 (April 16, 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Babar Ahmad and Others v The United Kingdom. Applications nos. 24027/07, 11949/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 and 67354/09 (April 10, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Benjamin Manuel v New Zealand. Communication No. 1385/2005, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/91/D/1385/2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Bester v Minister of Correctional Services and Others. 64018/09 [2012] ZAGPPHC 318 (November 28, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Birulev and Shishkin v Russia. Applications nos. 35919/05 and 3346/06 (June 14, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Blackstock v The United Kingdom. Application no. 59512/00 (June 21, 2005).]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Boesaleana v Public Prosecutor. VUCA 33, Criminal Appeal 07 of 2011 (November 25, 2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Čačko v Slovakia. Application no. 49905/08 (July 22, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Canada (Attorney General) v Coscia. 2005 FCA 132 (CanLII).]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Chaudhry v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration). [1999] 3 FCR 3, 1999 CanLII 7631 (FC).]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Clift v The United Kingdom. Application no. 7205/07 (July 13, 2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Communication No. 1968/2010, CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 (November 17, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Co-Prosecutors v Kaing, Co-Prosecutors’ Appeal Against the Judgement of the Trial Chamber in the Case of Kaing Guek Ea V Alias Ouch. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/SC (ECCC SC, Oct. 13, 2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Co-Prosecutors v Kaing. Appeal Judgement, F28, 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/SC (ECCC SC, Feb. 03, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Curley v The United Kingdom. Application no. 32340/96 (March 28, 2000).]Search in Google Scholar
[17. David Thomas v The United Kingdom. Application no. 55863/11 (November 4, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Del Río Prada v Spain. Application no. 42750/09 (October 21, 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Devine v Tasmania. [2006] TASSC 104 (December 1, 2006).]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Dillon v The United Kingdom. Application no. 32621/11 (November 4, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Du Preez v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Others. 2015 (1) SACR 478 (GP).]Search in Google Scholar
[22. E v State of Tasmania. [2008] TASSC 72 (November 20, 2008).10.1111/j.0028-8292.1982.tb00672.x]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Erdoğdu And İnce v Turkey. Applications nos. 25067/94 and 25068/94 (July 8, 1999).]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Evans v W H Dillahunty E. [1981] USCA8 646; 662 F.2d 522 (November 2, 1981).]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Ezeh and Connors v The United Kingdom. Applications nos. 39665/98 and 40086/98 (October 9, 2003).]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Freddie v Minister of Correctional Services and Others. (19293/2006) [2011] ZAGPPHC 54 (April 6, 2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Gelfmann v France. Application no. 25875/03 (December 14, 2004).]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Gerger v Turkey. Application no. 24919/94 (July 8, 1999).]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Ginther v Saskatchewan Government Insurance. 1987 CanLII 4605 (SK QB).]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Groenewald v Minister of Correctional Services and Others. (67533/09) [2010] ZAGPPHC 6; 2011 (1) SACR 231 (GNP).]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Harakchiev and Tolumov v Bulgaria. Applications nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12 (July 8, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Harkins and Edwards v The United Kingdom. Application nos. 9146/07 and 32650/07 (January 17, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Hussain v The United Kingdom. Application no. 21928/93 (February 21, 1996).]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Hutchins v Canada (National Parole Board). [1993] 3 FCR 505, 1993 CanLII 2981 (FCA).]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Ivko v Russia. Application no. 30575/08 (December 15, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[36. James, Wells and Lee v The United Kingdom. Applications nos. 25119/09, 57715/09 and 57877/09 (September 18, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Jimmale and Another v S. (CCT223/15) [2016] ZACC 27 (August 30, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[38. José Luis De León Castro v Spain. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/95/D/1388/2005 Communication No. 1388/2005 (March 19, 2009).]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Kang v Republic of Korea. Comm. 878/1999, U.N. Doc. A/58/40, Vol. II, at 152 (HRC 2003).]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Karpenko v Russia. Application no. 5605/04 (March 13, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Kazantsev v Russia. Application no. 14880/05 (April 3, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Khoroshenko v Russia. Application no. 41418/04 (June 30, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Knight v Money. [2015] VSC 105 (March 24, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Koryak v Russia. Application no. 24677/10 (November 13, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[45. László Magyar v Hungary. Application no. 73593/10 (May 20, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Law on the Approval and Entry into Force of the Criminal Code. September 26, 2000, No VIII-1968 [As last amended on February 11, 2010 – No XI-677].]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Léger v France. Application no. 19324/02 (March 30, 2009).]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Little v The State of Western Australia. [2007] WASC 33 (February 9, 2007).]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Lufuno Mphaphuli & Associates (Pty) Ltd v Andrews and Another. 2009 (4) SA 529 (CC); 2009 (6) BCLR 527 (CC).]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Mafoho v S. 2013 (2) SACR 179 (SCA).]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Makaba v Minister of Correctional Services and Others. (5369/2011) [2012] ZAFSHC 157 (August 16, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Manning v Police. [2015] SASC 49 (March 27, 2015).10.1007/978-1-4842-0277-7_3]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Mastromatteo v Italy. Application no. 37703/97 (October 24, 2002).]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Mitchell v. R. [1976] 2 SCR 570, 1975 CanLII 167 (SCC) p.588.]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Moefili v State Parole Authority & Anor. [2009] NSWSC 1146 (October 29, 2009).]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Mouisel v France. Application no. 67263/01 (November 14, 2002).]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Mtintso v S. (A1038/2013) [2015] ZAGPPHC 213 (April 21, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Murray v The Netherlands. Application no. 10511/10 (April 26, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Murray v The Netherlands. Application no. 10511/10 (December 10, 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[60. NGJF v Prisoners Review Board. [2010] WASC 107 (May 21, 2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Nogin v Russia. Application no. 58530/08 (January 15, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Novinskiy v Russia. Application no. 11982/02 (February 10, 2009).]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Nyawuza v S. (AR 262/13) [2014] ZAKZPHC 47 (September 16, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Oates v Parole Board. [2013] TASSC 10 (April 8, 2013).10.1353/mis.2013.0041]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Öcalan v Turkey (No. 2). Applications nos. 24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07 (March 18, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Okçuoğlu v Turkey. Application no. 24246/94 (July 8, 1999).]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Oldham v The United Kingdom. Application no. 36273/97 (September 26, 2000).]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Österreichischer Rundfunk v Austria. Application no. 35841/02 (December 7, 2006).]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Othman (Abu Qatada) v The United Kingdom. Application no. 8139/09 (January 17, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[70. Pledge to Abide by the Law Case 98Hun-Ma425. [2002] KRCC 4 (April 25, 2002) // http://www.worldlii.org/cgi-bin/sinodisp/kr/cases/KRCC/2002/4.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[71. Public Prosecutor v Alfred. [2008] VUSC 35; Criminal Case 23 of 2008 (April 18, 2008).]Search in Google Scholar
[72. Puzan v Ukraine. Application no. 51243/08 (February 18, 2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[73. R v Abdulla. [2011] SASCFC 20 (April 1, 2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[74. R v Dell. 2015 ONSC 1570 (CanLII).]Search in Google Scholar
[75. R v Franceschini. [2015] SASCFC 116 (August 17, 2015).10.4103/1463-1741.153403]Search in Google Scholar
[76. R v Precup. 2015 ONSC 2112 (CanLII).]Search in Google Scholar
[77. R v Yarema. 2006 CanLII 23953 (ON SC).]Search in Google Scholar
[78. R v Chaudhary. 1999 CanLII 14902 (ON SC) para 12; R. v Dell, 2015 ONSC 1570 (CanLII).]Search in Google Scholar
[79. R v Neale. 1985 CanLII 1197 (AB QB).]Search in Google Scholar
[80. Rangelov v Germany. Application no. 5123/07 (March 22, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[81. Ronald van der Plaat v New Zealand. Communication No. 1492/2006, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/93/D/1492/2006 (July 22, 2008).]Search in Google Scholar
[82. Rowe and Davis v The United Kingdom. Application no. 28901/95 (February 16, 2000).]Search in Google Scholar
[83. Rrapo v Albania. Application no. 58555/10 (September 25, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[84. Rumor v Italy. Application no. 72964/10 (May 27, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[85. S v Bull and Another. (221/2000) [2001] ZASCA 105 (September 26, 2001).]Search in Google Scholar
[86. S v Makwanyane and Another. 1995 (6) BCLR 665; 1995 (3) SA 391; [1996] 2 CHRLD 164; 1995 (2) SACR 1.10.1016/0022-1694(94)02652-R]Search in Google Scholar
[87. S v Sekiti. 2010 (1) SACR 622 (ECG).]Search in Google Scholar
[88. Shebe v Minister of Correctional Services and Others. (2338/2013) [2013] ZAFSHC 154 (September 19, 2013).10.1177/1078345813479205]Search in Google Scholar
[89. Singh v The United Kingdom. Application no. 23389/94 (February 21, 1996).]Search in Google Scholar
[90. Smt Suman v State Of Raj And Anr. CW Case No. 1665 of 2007 [2007] INRJHC 4159 (August 23, 2007).]Search in Google Scholar
[91. Stafford v The United Kingdom. Application no. 46295/99 (May 28, 2002).]Search in Google Scholar
[92. Stoyan Mitev v Bulgaria. Application no. 60922/00 (January 7, 2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[93. Sürek v Turkey (No. 1). Application no. 26682/95 (July 8, 1999).]Search in Google Scholar
[94. Sweeton v Brown. [1991] USCA6 1769; 944 F.2d 905 (September 17, 1991).]Search in Google Scholar
[95. Tai Wairiki Rameka, Anthony James Harris and Tai Rangi Tarawa v New Zealand. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/79/D/1090/2002 Communication No. 1090/2002 (November 6, 2003).]Search in Google Scholar
[96. Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell v The United Kingdom. Application no. 11787/85; 11978/86; 12009/86 (October 25, 1990).]Search in Google Scholar
[97. Trabelsi v Belgium. Application no. 140/10 (September 4, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[98. Valašinas v Lithuania. Application no. 44558/98 (July 24, 2001).]Search in Google Scholar
[99. Van Gund v Minister of Correctional Services and Others. 2011 (1) SACR 16 (GNP).]Search in Google Scholar
[100. Van Vuren v Minister of Correctional Services and Others. 2010 (12) BCLR 1233 (CC); 2012 (1) SACR 103 (CC).]Search in Google Scholar
[101. Vasyukov v Russia. Application no. 2974/05 (April 5, 2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[102. Vinter and Others v The United Kingdom. Applications nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10 (July 9, 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[103. Von Bülow v The United Kingdom. Application no. 75362/01 (October 7, 2003).]Search in Google Scholar
[104. Waite v The United Kingdom. Application no. 53236/99 (December 10, 2002).]Search in Google Scholar
[105. Weeks v The United Kingdom. Application no. 9787/82 2 (March 1987).]Search in Google Scholar
[106. Weiss v Austria. Comm. No. 1821/2008, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/106/D/1821/2008, Views (HRC, Oct. 24, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[107. Wiggil v S. (CA & R 137/2012) [2012] ZAECGHC 90 (November 21, 2012).10.12968/prps.2012.1.137.21]Search in Google Scholar
[108. Woodhouse v Canada (Correctional Service). 2010 BCSC 754 (CanLII).]Search in Google Scholar
[109. Wynne v The United Kingdom (no. 2). Application no. 67385/01 (October 16, 2003).]Search in Google Scholar
