[Agreed Minutes… (2010), Agreed Minutes on regulations pertaining to automotive fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions, added to the Free Trade Agreement Between the United States and the Republic of Korea, 3 December 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ahearne, A.; Pisani-Ferry, J.; Sapir, A. & Véron, N. (2006), The EU and the Governance of Globalization, Working Paper, No. 2006/02, Brussels: Bruegel.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barnier, M. (2014), Strengthening the Transatlantic Partnership Beyond TTIP: A strategic vision for the EU and US, Speech/14/464, European Commission, 12.06.2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCTPA (2014), Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities Act of 2014, H.R. 3830, introduced 19 January 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dudley, S. & Warren, M. (2012), Regulators Budget Report, Washington DC: Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drezner, D. (2014), The System Worked: How the World Stopped Another Great Depression, Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deutsche Welle (2013), ‘Transatlantic coalition rejects anti-consumer trade deal, ’ 13 June 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[EC (2012), ‘Statement of the European Union and the United States on Shared Principles for International Investment, ’ European Commission. Retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2012/april/tradoc_149331.pdf [accessed Oct 2014]]Search in Google Scholar
[— (2013a), Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: The Economic Analysis Explained, European Commission, Tradoc 151787, September 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[— (2013b), EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Trade Crosscutting Disciplines and Institutional Provisions, Initial EU position paper, European Commission, July 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[— (2014a), European Commission Trade, Countries, United States. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/united-states/[accessed 23 Jul 2014]]Search in Google Scholar
[— (2014b), ‘Note for the attention of the Trade Policy Committee, ’ CETA Consolidated Text, European Commission Directorate General for Trade, Brussels, 5 August 2014. Retrieved from http://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/ceta-dokument-101.pdf [accessed Oct 2014]]Search in Google Scholar
[EFSA (2008), ‘Scientific Option of the Panel on Biological Hazards on a Request from DG SANCO on the assessment of the possible effect of the four antimicrobial treatment substances on the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, ’ European Food Safety Agency Journal, vol. 659, pp. 1-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[EP (2014), ‘Commission Hearings, ’ European Parliament, 20.09.2014. Retrieved from http://www.elections2014.eu/en/new-commission/hearing/20140917HEA64702 [accessed 28 Oct 2014]]Search in Google Scholar
[EU (2011), Commission Regulation (EU) 619/2011 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed as regards presence of genetically modified material for which an authorisation procedure is pending or the authorisation of which has expired, Official Journal of the European Union, L 166, 25.06.2011, pp. 9-15.]Search in Google Scholar
[— (2012), Regulation (EU) No. 1219/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countries, Official Journal of the European Union, L 351, 20.12.2012, pp. 40-46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Erixon, F. (2014), ‘Investor-state disputes have put a spanner in the works for TTIP’ European Voice, 19 June 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Erixon, F. & Bauer, M. (2010), A Transatlantic Agreement: Estimating the Gains from Transatlantic Free Trade in Goods, Occasional Paper 4, Brussels: European Center For International Political Economy.]Search in Google Scholar
[Felbermayr, G.; Heid, B. & Lehwald, S. (2013), Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): Who benefits from a free trade deal? Global Economic Dynamics Paper, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fox, B. (2014), ‘Germany opposes EU-US investor protection scheme, ’ EUobserver, 15 March 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freund, C. (2014), Encouraging a Manufacturing Renaissance through the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Presentation at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC, 2 May 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[FTA (2007), Free Trade Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Korea of 30 June 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[— (2011), ‘Free trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, Official Journal of the European Union L127, 14.05.2011, pp. 1-1487.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guoyou, S. & Wen, J. Y. (2012), “China's Free Trade Agreement Strategies,” The Washington Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 107-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2012.72642510.1080/0163660X.2012.726425]Search in Google Scholar
[Ikenson, D. (2014), The Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism: An Examination of Benefits and Costs. Presentation at CATO, Washington DC, 20 May 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keating, D. (2014), ‘Member states warn Juncker against ISDS concessions, ’ European Voice, 22 October 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kraus, D. (2014), Italian and European Business. Presentation at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington DC, 2 May 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kleinheisterkamp. J. (2014), Is there a Need for Investor-State Arbitration in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)? LSE Working Papers, London: London School of Economics. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.241018810.2139/ssrn.2410188]Search in Google Scholar
[Layne, C. (2014), After the Fall, International Politics, U.S. Grand Strategy, and the End of the Pax Americana, New Haven: Yale University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lester, S. (2013), Liberalization or Litigation? Time to Rethink the International Investment Regime, Policy Analysis, no. 730, Washington, DC: Cato.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morrall III, J. (2011), Determining Compatible Regulatory Regimes between the U.S. and the EU, Washington DC: United States Chamber of Commerce.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD, WTO and World Bank Group (2014), Global Value Chains: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications for Policy. Report prepared for submission to the G20 Trade Ministers Meeting, Sydney, Australia 19 July 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[OICA (2013), International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers [Homepage] Retrieved from http://www.oica.net/category/production-statistics/ [accessed Oct 2014]]Search in Google Scholar
[Oldenski, L. (2014), American Manufacturing Growth Since NAFTA, Presentation at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington DC, 17 July 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pew (2012), The American-Western European Values Gap American Exceptionalism Subsides, Washington, DC: Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project.]Search in Google Scholar
[— (2014), Support in Principle for U.S.-EU Trade Pact, But Some Americans and Germans Wary of TTIP Details, Washington, DC: Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roland-Holst, D.; Reinert, K. & Shiells, C. R. (1994), ‘NAFTA Liberalization and the Role of Nontariff Barriers, ’ North American Journal of Economics & Finance, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 137-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1062-9408(94)90002-710.1016/1062-9408(94)90002-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoof, U.; Petersen, T. & Felbermeyer, G. (2013), Who Benefits from a Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement? Policy Brief, no. 4, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shi, Z. (2013), Is the US-EU Trade Pact a Way to Balance China? Brussels: Carnegie Europe. Retrieved from http://carnegietsinghua.org/2013/06/17/is-u.s.-eu-tradepact-way-to-balance-china/gand [accessed 4 Aug 2014]]Search in Google Scholar
[Thies, A. (2013), International Trade Disputes and EU Liability, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051184207810.1017/CBO9780511842078]Search in Google Scholar
[Trigkas, V. (2014), ‘The Strategic Implications of TAFTA/TTIP: Will it Engage or Contain China?’ in D. Cardoso et al. (eds.) The Transatlantic Colossus, Berlin: Berlin Forum on Global Politics, Internet & Society Collaboratory, pp. 54-59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ülgen, S. (2014), Locked In or Left Out? Transatlantic Trade Beyond Brussels and Washington, Working Paper, Brussels: Carnegie Europe.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNCTAD (2006), Preserving Flexibility in IIAs: The use of reservations, New York & Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[— (2014), Recent Developments in Investor-State Dispute Settlement, New York & Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[WEF (2014), Mega-regional Trade Agreements Game-Changers or Costly Distractions for the World Trading System? Cologne & Geneva: World Economic Forum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whittington, L. (2014), ‘Implementing Canada-EU free-trade deal could take another two years, ’ The Star, 24 April 2014, p. 3.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolf, M. (2007), ‘A Korean-American strand enters trade's spaghetti bowl, ’ Financial Times, 3 April 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[WTO (2014), China - Anti-dumping and countervailing duties on certain automobiles from the United States, World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Report WT/DS440/R.]Search in Google Scholar
