This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Porapakkham Y, Punyaratabandhu P. Health Information System Development Office: diabetes in Thai population. Health Situation in Thailand. 2006; 2:1-6. [in Thai]PorapakkhamYPunyaratabandhuP.Health Information System Development Office: diabetes in Thai population2006211[in Thai]Search in Google Scholar
Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010; 87:4-14.1989674610.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007ShawJESicreeRAZimmetPZ.Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 203020108741419896746Search in Google Scholar
Aekplakorn W. The Fourth National Health Examination Survey 2009. Nonthaburi: Health Systems Research Institute Bureau of Policy and Strategy; 2010. [in Thai]AekplakornW.NonthaburiHealth Systems Research Institute Bureau of Policy and Strategy2010[in Thai]Search in Google Scholar
Lohsoonthorn V, Jiamjarasrungsi W. Epidemiology, risk factors, and screening program for type 2 diabetes in Thailand. Health Systems Research Institute Journal. 2008; 2:623-41. [in Thai]LohsoonthornVJiamjarasrungsiW.Epidemiology, risk factors, and screening program for type 2 diabetes in Thailand20082623623[in Thai]Search in Google Scholar
Vannasaeng S. Burden of Diabetes in Thailand. In: Diabetes Situation in Thailand 2007. Nitiyanant W, Vannasaeng S, Deerochochanawong C, editors. Bangkok: Vivat Press; 2007: p. 1-16.VannasaengS.Burden of Diabetes in ThailandNitiyanantWVannasaengSDeerochochanawongCBangkokVivat Press2007116Search in Google Scholar
Diabetes Association of Thailand, The Endocrine Society of Thailand, National Health Security Office Thailand. Diabetes Clinical Guidline 2008. Bangkok: Rungsin; 2008.Diabetes Association of Thailand, The Endocrine Society of Thailand, National Health Security Office ThailandBangkokRungsin2008Search in Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998; 2:1-74.FitzpatrickRDaveyCBuxtonMJJonesDR.Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials1998217410.3310/hta2140Search in Google Scholar
Ader DN. Developing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med Care. 2007; 45 (Suppl 1):S1-2.10.1097/01.mlr.0000260537.45076.74AderDN.Developing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)200745Suppl 1S12Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007; 45 (Suppl 1): S3-11.1744311610.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55CellaDYountSRothrockNGershonRCookKReeveBThe Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years200745Suppl 1S311282975817443116Search in Google Scholar
Skovlund SE. Patient-reported assessments in diabetes care: clinical and research applications. Current Diabetes Reports. 2005; 5:115-23.10.1007/s11892-005-0038-815794915SkovlundSE.Patient-reported assessments in diabetes care: clinical and research applications200551152315794915Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Spradley JP. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1979.SpradleyJP.New YorkHolt, Rinehart & Winston1979Search in Google Scholar
Catherine P, Sue Z, Nicholas M. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000; 320:114-16.1062527310.1136/bmj.320.7227.114CatherinePSueZNicholasM.Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data200032011416111736810625273Search in Google Scholar
Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. In: A template approach to text analysis: developing and using codebooks. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1992; 93-109.CrabtreeBFMillerWL.Doing qualitative researchCrabtreeBFMillerWLNewbury Park, CASage199293109Search in Google Scholar
Richards L. Handling qualitative data: a practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005.RichardsL.Thousand Oaks, CASage2005Search in Google Scholar
Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986; 35:382-85.3640358LynnMR.Determination and quantification of content validity1986353828510.1097/00006199-198611000-00017Search in Google Scholar
Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported?: critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006; 29:489-97.10.1002/nur.2014716977646PolitDFBeckCT.The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported?: critique and recommendations2006294899716977646Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
International Diabetes Federation, Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. Brussels; 2005.International Diabetes Federation, Clinical Guidelines Task ForceBrussels2005Search in Google Scholar
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York; McGraw-Hill; 1994.NunnallyJCBernsteinIH.3rdNew YorkMcGraw-Hill1994Search in Google Scholar
MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods. 1999; 4:84-99.10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84MacCallumRCWidamanKFZhangSHongS.Sample size in factor analysis199948499Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2010.ByrneBM.2ndNew YorkRoutledge2010Search in Google Scholar
Garratt AM, Schmidt LJ, Mackintosh AE, Fitzpatrick R. Instruments for diabetes: a review. Report from the Patient-reported Health Instruments Group to the Department of Health. Oxford: National Centre for Health Outcomes Development; 2000.GarrattAMSchmidtLJMackintoshAEFitzpatrickR.Instruments for diabetes: a reviewOxfordNational Centre for Health Outcomes Development2000Search in Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick R, Bowling A, Gibbons E, Haywood K, Jenkinson C, Mackintosh AE, et al. A structured review of patient-reported measures in relation to selected chronic conditions, perceptions of quality of care and carer impact in health. Report from the Patient-reported Health Instruments Group to the Department of Health. Oxford: National Centre for Health Outcomes Development; 2006.FitzpatrickRBowlingAGibbonsEHaywoodKJenkinsonCMackintoshAEA structured review of patient-reported measures in relation to selected chronic conditions, perceptions of quality of care and carer impact in healthOxfordNational Centre for Health Outcomes Development2006Search in Google Scholar
Magwood GS, Zapka J, Jenkins C. A review of systematic reviews evaluating diabetes interventions: focus on quality of life and disparities. The Diabetes Educator. 2008; 34:242-65.10.1177/014572170831655118375775MagwoodGSZapkaJJenkinsC.A review of systematic reviews evaluating diabetes interventions: focus on quality of life and disparities20083424265401400618375775Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Achhab YE, Nejjari C, Chikri M, Lyoussi B. Diseasespecific health-related quality of life instruments among adults diabetic: a systematic review. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2008; 80:171-84.10.1016/j.diabres.2007.12.020AchhabYENejjariCChikriMLyoussiB.Diseasespecific health-related quality of life instruments among adults diabetic: a systematic review20088017184Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sudsook U, Jarupoonpon P, Fongsatitkul P, Kelvalinsalid J, Juntarad S, Seangsanor J, et al. The study on situation of activities of daily living, need and quality of life of the elderly. Bangkok; National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT); 2009.SudsookUJarupoonponPFongsatitkulPKelvalinsalidJJuntaradSSeangsanorJThe study on situation of activities of daily living, need and quality of life of the elderly2009Search in Google Scholar
Thiamwong L, Maneesriwongul W, Malathum P, Jitapunkul S, Vorapongsathorn T, Stewart AL. Development and psychometric testing of the Healthy Aging Instrument. Thai J Nurs Res. 2008; 12:285-96.ThiamwongLManeesriwongulWMalathumPJitapunkulSVorapongsathornTStewartAL.Development and psychometric testing of the Healthy Aging Instrument20081228596Search in Google Scholar
Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, Glasgow RE, Engelgau MM, Jr LJ, et al. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22:39-66.11985934NorrisSLNicholsPJCaspersenCJGlasgowREEngelgauMMJrLJA systematic review200222396610.1016/S0749-3797(02)00424-5Search in Google Scholar
Charron-Prochownik C, Zgibor JC, Peyrot M, Peeples M, McWilliams J, Koshinsky J, et al. The Diabetes Self-management Assessment Report Tool (DSMART): process evaluation and patient satisfaction. The Diabetes Educator. 2007; 33:833-38.10.1177/0145721707307613Charron-ProchownikCZgiborJCPeyrotMPeeplesMMcWilliamsJKoshinskyJThe Diabetes Self-management Assessment Report Tool (DSMART): process evaluation and patient satisfaction2007338333817925587Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Heisler M, Smith DM, Hayward RA, Krein SL, Kerr EA. How well do patients’ assessments of their diabetes self-management correlate with actual glycemic control and receipt of recommended diabetes services? Diabetes Care. 2003; 26:738-43.10.2337/diacare.26.3.73812610031HeislerMSmithDMHaywardRAKreinSLKerrEA.How well do patients’ assessments of their diabetes self-management correlate with actual glycemic control and receipt of recommended diabetes services?2003267384312610031Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ciechanowski P, Russo J, Katon W, Korff MV, Ludman E, Lin E, et al. Influence of patient attachment style on self-care and outcomes in diabetes. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2004; 66:720-28.10.1097/01.psy.0000138125.59122.2315385697CiechanowskiPRussoJKatonWKorffMVLudmanELinEInfluence of patient attachment style on self-care and outcomes in diabetes2004667202815385697Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Fitzpatrick R. Older people specific health status and quality of life: a structured review of self-assessed instruments. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2004; 11:315-27.HaywoodKLGarrattAMFitzpatrickR.Older people specific health status and quality of life: a structured review of self-assessed instruments2004113152710.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00538.x16011644Search in Google Scholar
Wong AKY, Stewart AGO, Furler JS. Development and validation of Diabetes Management Orientation Scale (DMOS): Assessing culturally related approaches to diabetes self-management. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009; 86:24-30.1967148210.1016/j.diabres.2009.07.005WongAKYStewartAGOFurlerJS.Development and validation of Diabetes Management Orientation Scale (DMOS): Assessing culturally related approaches to diabetes self-management200986243019671482Search in Google Scholar
Garratt AM, Schmidt L, Fitzpatrick R. Patient-assessed health outcome measures for diabetes: a structured review. Diabetic Medicine. 2002; 19:1-11.10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00650.xGarrattAMSchmidtLFitzpatrickR.Patient-assessed health outcome measures for diabetes: a structured review20021911111869297Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bradley C, Todd C, Gorton T, Symonds E, Martin A, Plowright R. The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL. Quality of Life Research. 1999; 8:79-91.10.1023/A:1026485130100BradleyCToddCGortonTSymondsEMartinAPlowrightR.The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL199987991Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Meadows K, Steen N, McColl E, Eccles M, Shiels C, Hewison J, et al. The Diabetes Health Profile (DHP): a new instrument for assessing the psychosocial profile of insulin requiring patients—development and psychometric evaluation. Qual Life Res. 1996; 5: 242-54.10.1007/BF004347468998493MeadowsKSteenNMcCollEEcclesMShielsCHewisonJThe Diabetes Health Profile (DHP): a new instrument for assessing the psychosocial profile of insulin requiring patients—development and psychometric evaluation19965242548998493Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boyer JG, Earp JAL. The development of an instrument for assessing the quality of life of people with diabetes: Diabetes-39. Medical Care. 1997; 35:440-53.10.1097/00005650-199705000-000039140334BoyerJGEarpJAL.The development of an instrument for assessing the quality of life of people with diabetes: Diabetes-39199735440539140334Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Huang IC, Hwang CC, Wu MY, Lin W, Leite W, Wu AW. Diabetes-specific or generic measures for health-related quality of life? evidence from psychometric validation of the D-39 and SF-36. Value Health. 2008; 11:450-61.1848966810.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00261.xHuangICHwangCCWuMYLinWLeiteWWuAW.Diabetes-specific or generic measures for health-related quality of life? evidence from psychometric validation of the D-39 and SF-362008114506118489668Search in Google Scholar
Paddock LE, Veloski J, Chatterton ML, Gevirtz FO, Nash DB. Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with diabetes disease management. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23:951-56.10.2337/diacare.23.7.95110895845PaddockLEVeloskiJChattertonMLGevirtzFONashDB.Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with diabetes disease management2000239515610895845Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Snoek FJ, Pouwer F, Welch GW, Polonsky WH. Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 1305-09.1097702310.2337/diacare.23.9.1305SnoekFJPouwerFWelchGWPolonskyWH.Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale20002313050910977023Search in Google Scholar
Lawson VL, Bundy C, Harvey JN. Development of the Diabetes Health Threat Communication Questionnaire (DHTCQ). Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 67:117-26.1753259610.1016/j.pec.2007.02.012LawsonVLBundyCHarveyJN.Development of the Diabetes Health Threat Communication Questionnaire (DHTCQ)2007671172617532596Search in Google Scholar
Jitapunkul S, Kamolratanakul P, Ebrahim S. The meaning of activities of daily living in a Thai elderly population: development of a new index. Age Ageing. 1994; 23: 97-101.10.1093/ageing/23.2.97JitapunkulSKamolratanakulPEbrahimS.The meaning of activities of daily living in a Thai elderly population: development of a new index199423971018023736Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maddigan SL, Majumdar SR, Guirguis LM, Lewanczuk RZ, Lee TK, Toth EL, et al. Improvements in patientreported outcomes associated with an intervention to enhance quality of care for rural patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27:1306-12.10.2337/diacare.27.6.1306MaddiganSLMajumdarSRGuirguisLMLewanczukRZLeeTKTothELImprovements in patientreported outcomes associated with an intervention to enhance quality of care for rural patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a controlled trial20042713061215161780Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Anderson RT, Girman CJ, Pawaskar MD, Camacho FT, Calles J, Kelly WS, et al. Diabetes medication satisfaction tool: a focus on treatment regimens. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32:51-53.10.2337/dc08-0856AndersonRTGirmanCJPawaskarMDCamachoFTCallesJKellyWSDiabetes medication satisfaction tool: a focus on treatment regimens2009325153260682918931098Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Lu JF. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts: results from the medical outcomes study. Med Care. 1992; 30 (Suppl):MS253-65.McHorneyCAWareJEJrRogersWRaczekAELuJF.The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts: results from the medical outcomes study199230MS2536510.1097/00005650-199205001-000251583937Search in Google Scholar
Ware JE. Improvements in short-form measures of health status: introduction to a series. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61:1-5.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.08.00818083456WareJE.Improvements in short-form measures of health status: introduction to a series2008611518083456Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Srithongsuk D. Development and testing of Thai quality of life questionaire for diabetic patients at Yangtalad Hospital; Kalasin. Pharm.D thesis. Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham, Thailand; 2007.SrithongsukD.Mahasarakham UniversityMahasarakham, Thailand2007Search in Google Scholar
Songraksa K, Lerkiatbundit S. Development of a disease specific quality of life instrument: Thai version of the Diabetes-39. Songkla Med J. 2009; 27:35-49.SongraksaKLerkiatbunditS.Development of a disease specific quality of life instrument: Thai version of the Diabetes-392009273549Search in Google Scholar
Rubin RR, Peyrot M, Siminerio LM. Health care and patient-reported outcomes; result of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes Wished and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29:1249-55.10.2337/dc05-2494RubinRRPeyrotMSiminerioLM.Health care and patient-reported outcomes; result of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes Wished and Needs (DAWN) study20062912495516732004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36 - Item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993; 31: 247-63.845068110.1097/00005650-199303000-00006McHorneyCAWareJERaczekAE.The MOS 36 - Item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs199331247638450681Search in Google Scholar
McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JFR, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 -Item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Test of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994; 32:40-66.827780110.1097/00005650-199401000-00004McHorneyCAWareJELuJFRSherbourneCD.The MOS 36 -Item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Test of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups19943240668277801Search in Google Scholar