Normative anatomy of the anal sphincter detected with 3D-endoanal ultrasonography

1. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg. 1994; 81:463-5.10.1002/bjs.1800810349Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Christensen AF, Nyhuus B, Nielsen MB, Christensen H. Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve diagnostic confidence of detecting damage to the anal sphincter complex. Br J Radiol. 2005; 78:308-11.10.1259/bjr/72038963Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Abdool Z, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter complex: a review. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85:865-75.10.1259/bjr/27314678Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, Whitehead WE. AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology. 1999; 116:735-60.10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70195-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Dobben AC, Terra MP, Slors JF, Deutekom M, Gerhards MF, Beets-Tan RG, et al. External anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence: comparison of endoanal MR Imaging and Endoanal US. Radiology. 2007; 242:463-71.10.1148/radiol.2422051575Search in Google Scholar

6. Saranovic D, Barisic G, Krivokapic Z, Masulovic D, Djuric-Stefanovic A. Endoanal ultrasound evaluation of anorectal diseases and disorders: technique, indications, results and limitations. Eur J Radiol. 2007; 61:480-9.10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.07.033Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Knowles AM, Knowles CH, Scott SM, Lunniss PJ. Effects of age and gender on three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography measurements: development of normal ranges. Tech Coloproctol. 2008; 12:323-9.10.1007/s10151-008-0443-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Olsen IP, Augensen K, Wilsgaard T, Kiserud T. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincters during rest and squeeze. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87:669-74.10.1080/00016340802088346Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. William AB, Cheetham MJ, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, et al. Gender differences in the longitudinal pressure profile of the anal canal related to anatomical structure as demonstrated on three-dimensional anal endosonography. Br J Surg. 2000; 87:1674-9.10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01581.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Regadas FS, Murad-Regadas SM, Lima DM, Silva FR, Barreto RG, Souza MH, et al. Anal canal anatomy showed by three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21:2207-11.10.1007/s00464-007-9339-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11. Burnette SJ, Bartram CI. Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorect Dis. 1991; 6:2-4.10.1007/BF00703951Search in Google Scholar

12. Papachrysostomou M, Pye SD, Wild SR, Smith AN. Anal endosonography in asymptomatic subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993; 28:551-6.10.3109/00365529309098265Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Simmons K, Corcoran A, Clark AL. External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194:1243-8.10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.822Search in Google Scholar

14. Felt-Bersma RJ, Cazemier M. Endosonography in anorectal disease: an overview. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006; 41(suppl 243):165-74.10.1080/00365520600664292Search in Google Scholar

15. Rottenberg GT, William AB. Endoanal ultrasound. Br J Radiol. 2002; 75:482-8.10.1259/bjr.75.893.750482Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Schaffzin DM, Wong WD. Surgeon-performed ultrasound: endorectal ultrasound. Surg Clin N Am. 2004; 84:1127-49.10.1016/j.suc.2004.04.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar