Review article. Diagnosis and management of venomous snakebites in Southeast Asia

1. World Health Organization. Neglected tropical diseases; Snakebite [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2012 Apr 4]. Available from http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/diseases/snakebites/en/Search in Google Scholar

2. Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, de Silva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeswaran A, Premaratna R, et al. The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008; 5:e218.10.1371/journal.pmed.0050218Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Chanhome L, Cox MJ, Vasaruchapong T, Chaiyabutr N, Sitprija V. Characterization of venomous snakes of Thailand. Asian Biomed. 2011; 5:311-28.Search in Google Scholar

4. Limthongkul S, Pochanugool C, Meemano K. Respiratory failure and its non-antivenin treatment in 37 adult neurotoxic snakes bite patients. In: Gophalakrishnakone P, Tan CK, editors. Progress in Venom and Toxic Research Singapore: National University of Singapore Press; 1987. p. 52-9.Search in Google Scholar

5. Laothong C, Sitprija V. Decreased parasympathetic activities in Malayan krait (Bungarus candidus) envenoming. Toxicon. 2001; 39:1353-7.10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00087-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Leeprasert W, Kaojarern S. Specific antivenom for Bungarus candidus. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007; 90: 1467-76.Search in Google Scholar

7. Warrell DA, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Theakston RD, Warrell MJ, Kosakarn W, et al. Severe neurotoxic envenoming by the Malayan krait Bungarus candidus (Linnaeus): response to antivenom and anticholinesterase. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983; 286:678-80.10.1136/bmj.286.6366.678Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Warrell DA. Snake venoms in science and clinical medicine. 1. Russell’s viper: biology, venom and treatment of bites. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1989; 83:732-40.10.1016/0035-9203(89)90311-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. Rojnuckarin P. Snakebite-induced coagulopathy and bleeding disorders. In: Kini RM, Clemetson KJ, Markland FS, McLane MA, Morita T. Toxins and Hemostasis: From bench to bedside. Dordrecht: Springer. 2000, p. 699-710.10.1007/978-90-481-9295-3_39Search in Google Scholar

10. Mitrakul C, Impun C. The hemorrhagic phenomena associated with green pit viper (Trimeresurus erythrurus and Trimeresurus popeorum) bites in children. A report of studies to elucidate their pathogenesis. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1973; 12:215-8.10.1177/000992287301200409Search in Google Scholar

11. Rojnuckarin P, Intragumtornchai T, Sattapiboon R, Muanpasitporn C, Pakmanee N, Khow O, et al. The effects of green pit viper (Trimeresurus albolabris and Trimeresurus macrops) venom on the fibrinolytic system in human. Toxicon. 1999; 37:743-55.10.1016/S0041-0101(98)00214-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Mitrakul C. Effect of five Thai snake venoms on coagulation, fibrinolysis and platelet aggregation. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1979; 10: 266-75.Search in Google Scholar

13. Warrell DA. Guidelines for the management of snakebite. New Delhi: WHO regional office for Southeast Asia; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

14. Sano-Martins IS, Fan HW, Castro SC, Tomy SC, Franca FO, Jorge MT, et al. Reliability of the simple 20 minute whole blood clotting test (WBCT20) as an indicator of low plasma fibrinogen concentration in patients envenomed by Bothrops snakes. Butantan Institute Antivenom Study Group. Toxicon. 1994; 32: 1045-50.10.1016/0041-0101(94)90388-3Search in Google Scholar

15. Pongpit J, Limpawittayakul P, Juntiang J, Akkawat B, Rojnuckarin P. The role of prothrombin time (PT) in evaluating green pit viper (Cryptelytrops sp) bitten patients. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2012; 106:415-8.10.1016/j.trstmh.2012.04.00322627102Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Ho M, Warrell DA, Looareesuwan S, Phillips RE, Chanthavanich P, Karbwang J, et al. Clinical significance of venom antigen levels in patients envenomed by the Malayan pit viper (Calloselasma rhodostoma). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986; 35:579-87.10.4269/ajtmh.1986.35.5793706625Search in Google Scholar

17. Ribeiro LA, Jorge MT, Lebrão ML Prognostic factors for local necrosis in Bothrops jararaca (Brazilian pit viper) bites. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002; 95: 630-410.1016/S0035-9203(01)90101-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Pugh RN, Theakston RD. Fatality following use of a tourniquet after viper bite envenoming. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1987; 81:77-8.10.1080/00034983.1987.11812097Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Sutherland SK, Coulter AR, Harris RD. Rationalisation of first-aid measures for elapid snakebite Lancet. 1979; 1:183-5.Search in Google Scholar

20. Norris RL, Ngo J, Nolan K, Hooker G. Physicians and lay people are unable to apply pressure immobilization properly in a simulated snakebite scenario. Wilderness Environ Med. 2005; 16:16-21.10.1580/PR12-04.1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Watt G, Padre L, Tuazon ML, Theakston RD, Laughlin LW. Tourniquet application after cobra bite: delay in the onset of neutotoxicity and dangers of sudden release. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998; 38:618-22.10.4269/ajtmh.1988.38.618Search in Google Scholar

22. Suankratay C, Wilde H, Nunthapisud P, Khantipong M. Tetanus after white-lipped green pit viper (Trimeresurus albolabris) bite. Wilderness Environ Med. 2002; 13:256-61.10.1580/1080-6032(2002)013[0256:TAWLGP]2.0.CO;2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Rojnuckarin P, Mahasandana S, Intragumtornchai T, Swasdikul D, Sutcharitchan P. Moderate to severe cases of green pit viper bites in Chulalongkorn hospital. J Hematol Transfus Med. 1996; 6:199-205.Search in Google Scholar

24. Nuchprayoon I, Pongpan C, Sripaiboonkij N. The role of prednisolone in reducing limb oedema in children bitten by green pit vipers: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2008; 102: 643-9.10.1179/136485908X311786Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25. Rojnuckarin P, Mahasandana S, Intragumtornchai T, Sutcharitchan P, Swasdikul D. Prognostic factors of green pit viper bites. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998; 58: 22-5.10.4269/ajtmh.1998.58.22Search in Google Scholar

26. Rojnuckarin P, Banjongkit S, Chantawibun W, Akkawat B, Juntiang J, Noiphrom J. Pakmanee N, Intragumtornchai T. Green pit viper (Trimeresurus albolabris and T. macrops) venom antigenaemia and kinetics in humans. Trop Doct. 2007; 37:207-10.10.1258/004947507782332838Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27. Archundia IG, de Roodt AR, Ramos-Cerrillo B, Chippaux JP, Olguín-Pérez L, Alagón A, et al. Neutralization of Vipera and Macrovipera venoms by two experimental polyvalent antisera: a study of paraspecificity. Toxicon. 2011; 57:1049-56.10.1016/j.toxicon.2011.04.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. Chotwiwatthanakun C, Pratanaphon R, Akesowan S, Sriprapat S, Ratanabanangkoon K. Production of potent polyvalent antivenom against three elapid venoms using a low dose, low volume, multi-site immunization protocol. Toxicon. 2001; 39:1487-94.10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00108-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. Otero R, Gutiérrez JM, Rojas G, Núñez V, Díaz A, Miranda E, et al. A randomized blinded clinical trial of two antivenoms, prepared by caprylic acid or ammonium sulphate fractionation of IgG, in Bothrops and Porthidium snake bites in Colombia: correlation between safety and biochemical characteristics of antivenoms. Toxicon. 1999; 37:895-908.10.1016/S0041-0101(98)00220-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Otero-Patiño R, Cardoso JL, Higashi HG, Nunez V, Diaz A, Toro MF, et al. A randomized, blinded, comparative trial of one pepsin-digested and two whole IgG antivenoms for Bothrops snake bites in Uraba, Colombia. The Regional Group on Antivenom Therapy Research (REGATHER). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998; 58:183-9.10.4269/ajtmh.1998.58.183Search in Google Scholar

31. Boyer LV, Seifert SA, Cain JS. Recurrence phenomena after immunoglobulin therapy for snake envenomations: Part 2. Guidelines for clinical management with crotaline Fab antivenom. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 37:196-201.10.1067/mem.2001.113134Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32. Pochanugool C, Limthongkul S, Wilde H. Management of Thai cobra bites with a single bolus of antivenin. Wilderness Environ Med. 1997; 8:20-3.10.1580/1080-6032(1997)008[0020:MOTCBW]2.3.CO;2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

33. Mitrakul C, Impun C. The hemorrhagic phenomena associated with green pit viper (Trimeresurus erythrus and Trimeresurus popeorum) bites in children. A report of studies in elucidate their pathogenesis. Clin Pediatr. 1973; 12:215-8.10.1177/000992287301200409Search in Google Scholar

34. Karnchanachetanee C, Hanvivatvong O, Mahasandana S Monospecific antivenin therapy in Russell´s viper bite. J Med Assoc Thai. 1994; 77:293-7.Search in Google Scholar

35. Mitrakul C. Juzi U, Pongrujikorn W. Antivenom therapy in Russell’s viper bite. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991; 95:412-7.10.1093/ajcp/95.3.412Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36. Hung DZ, Yu YJ, Hsu CL, Lin TJ. Antivenom treatment and renal dysfunction in Russell’s viper snakebite in Taiwan: a case series. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006; 100:489-94.10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.07.020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

37. Rojnuckarin P, Chanthawibun W, Noiphrom J, Pakmanee N, Intragumtornchai T. A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of antivenom for local effects of green pit viper bites. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006; 100:879-84. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.10.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38. Chotenimitkhun R, RojnuckarinP. Systemic Antivenom and Skin Necrosis after Green Pit Viper Bites. Clin Toxicol. 2008; 46:122-5.10.1080/15563650701266826Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

39. Gutiérrez JM, León G, Rojas G, Lomonte B, Rucavado A, Chaves F. Neutralization of local tissue damage induced by Bothrops asper (terciopelo) snake venom. Toxicon. 1998; 36:1529-38.10.1016/S0041-0101(98)00145-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

40. Thiansookon A, Rojnuckarin P. Low Incidence of Early Reactions to Horse-derived F(ab’)2 Antivenom for Snakebites in Thailand. Acta Trop. 2008; 105:203-5.10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.09.00717996842Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

41. Isbister GK, Brown SG, MacDonald E, White J, Currie BJ; Australian Snakebite Project Investigators. Current use of Australian snake antivenoms and frequency of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis. Med J Aust. 2008; 188:473-6.10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01721.x18429716Search in Google Scholar

42. Malasit P, Warrell DA, Chanthavanich P, Viravan C, Mongkolsapaya J, Singhthong B, et al. Prediction, prevention, and mechanism of early (anaphylactic) antivenom reactions in victims of snake bites. BMJ. 1986; 292:17-20.10.1136/bmj.292.6512.1713389723080048Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

43. Otero R, León G, Gutiérrez JM, Rojas G, Toro MF, Barona J, et al. Efficacy and safety of two whole IgG polyvalent antivenoms, refined by caprylic acid fractionation with or without beta-propiolactone, in the treatment of Bothrops asper bites in Colombia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006; 100:1173-82.10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.01.00616698053Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

44. Premawardhena AP, de Silva CE, Fonseka MM, Gunatilake SB, de Silva HJ. Low dose subcutaneous adrenaline to prevent acute adverse reactions to antivenom serum in people bitten by snakes: randomised, placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 1999; 17: 1041-3.10.1136/bmj.318.7190.10412783510205101Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

45. de Silva HA, Pathmeswaran A, Ranasinha CD, Jayamanne S, Samarakoon SB, Hittharage A, et al. Low-dose adrenaline, promethazine, and hydrocortisone in the prevention of acute adverse reactions to antivenom following snakebite: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2011; 8:e1000435.10.1371/journal.pmed.1000435309184921572992Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

46. Gawarammana IB, Kularatne SA, Dissanayake WP, Kumarasiri RP, Senanayake N, Ariyasena H. Parallel infusion of hydrocortisone +/- chlorpheniramine bolus injection to prevent acute adverse reactions to antivenom for snakebites. Med J Aust. 2004; 180:20-3.10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05768.x14709123Search in Google Scholar

47. Fan HW, Marcopito LF, Cardoso JL, França FO, Malaque CM, Ferrari RA, et al. Sequential randomised and double blind trial of promethazine prophylaxis against early anaphylactic reactions to antivenom for bothrops snake bites. BMJ. 1999; 29:1451-2.10.1136/bmj.318.7196.14512788710346769Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

48. Isbister GK, Shahmy S, Mohamed F, Abeysinghe C, Karunathilake H, Ariaratnam A. A randomised controlled trial of two infusion rates to decrease reactions to antivenom. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e38739.10.1371/journal.pone.0038739337770222719932Search in Google Scholar

49. Gold BS, Dart RC, Barish RA. Bites of venomous snakes. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:347-56.10.1056/NEJMra01347712151473Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

50. Jorge MT, Malaque C, Ribeiro LA, Fan HW, Cardoso JL, Nishioka SA, et al. Failure of chloramphenicol prophylaxis to reduce the frequency of abscess formation as a complication of envenoming by Bothrops snakes in Brazil: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004; 98:529-34.10.1016/j.trstmh.2003.12.00915251401Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

51. Pongprasit P, Mitrakul C, Nopadon N. Histopathology and microbiological study of cobra bite wounds. J Med Assoc Thai. 1988; 71:475-80.Search in Google Scholar

52. Theakston RD, Phillips RE, Looareesuwan S, Echeverria P, Makin T, Warrell DA Bacteriological studies of the venom and mouth cavities of wild Malayan pit vipers (Calloselasma rhodostoma) in Southern Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002; 84:875-9.Search in Google Scholar