The efficacy of 4% lidocaine with 3% ephedrine used on nasal packs or as a nasal spray for pain relief in nasal endoscopy

1. Douglas R, Hawke L, Wormald PJ. Topical anaesthesia before nasendoscopy: a randomized controlled trial of co-phenylcaine compared with lignocaine. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006; 31:33-5.10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01129.xSearch in Google Scholar

2. Georgalas C, Sandhu G, Frosh A, Xenellis J. Cophenylcaine spray vs. placebo in flexible nasendoscopy: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59:130-3.10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00476.xSearch in Google Scholar

3. Johnson PE, Belafsky PC, Postma GN. Topical nasal anesthesia for transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, cross-over study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 128:452-4.10.1016/S0194-5998(02)23294-5Search in Google Scholar

4. Smith JC, Rockley TJ. A comparison of cocaine and ‘co-phenylcaine’ local anaesthesia in flexible nasendoscopy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002; 27: 192-6.10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00563.x12071996Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Cain AJ, Murray DP, McClymont LG. The use of topical nasal anaesthesia before flexible nasendoscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing cophenylcaine with placebo. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002; 27:485-8.10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00608.x12472516Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Temmel AF, Quint C, Toth J, Herneth A, Hummel T. Topical ephedrine administration and nasal chemosensory function in healthy human subjects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 125:1012-4.10.1001/archotol.125.9.101210488988Search in Google Scholar

7. Frosh AC, Jayaraj S, Porter G, Almeyda J. Is local anaesthesia actually beneficial in flexible fibreoptic nasendoscopy? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998; 23: 259-62.10.1046/j.1365-2273.1998.00149.x9669077Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Singh V, Brockbank MJ, Todd GB. Flexible transnasal endoscopy: is local anaesthetic necessary? J Laryngol Otol. 1997; 111:616-8.Search in Google Scholar

9. Kasemsuwan L, Griffiths MV. Lignocaine with adrenaline: is it as effective as cocaine in rhinological practice? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1996; 21:127-9.10.1111/j.1365-2273.1996.tb01315.x8735396Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Jonathan DA, Violaris NS. Comparison of cocaine and lignocaine as intranasal local anaesthetics. J Laryngol Otol. 1988; 102:628-9.10.1017/S00222151001059243411220Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11. Scianna JM, Chow JM, Hotaling A. Analysis of possible cross-contamination with the Venturi system atomizer. Am J Rhinol .2005; 19:503-7.10.1177/194589240501900514Search in Google Scholar

12. Dubin MG, White DR, Melroy CT, Gergan MT, Rutala WA, Senior BA. Multi-use Venturi nasal atomizer contamination in a clinical rhinologic practice. Am J Rhinol. 2004; 18:151-6.10.1177/194589240401800304Search in Google Scholar

13. Wolfe TR, Hillman TA, Bossart PJ. The comparative risks of bacterial contamination between a venturi atomizer and a positive displacement atomizer. Am J Rhinol. 2002; 16:181-6.10.1177/194589240201600401Search in Google Scholar

14. Spraggs PD, Hanekom WH, Mochloulis G, Joseph T, Kelsey MC. The assessment of the risk of crossinfection with a multi-use nasal atomizer. J Hosp Infect. 1994; 28:315-21.10.1016/0195-6701(94)90095-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Coakley JF, Arthurs GJ, Wilsher TK. The need for and development of a single use disposable nasal spray. J Laryngol Otol. 1993; 107:20-3 10.1017/S00222151001220298445304Search in Google Scholar