[Van der Geer, J., Hanraads, J. A. J., & Lupton, R. A. (2000). The art of writing a scientific article. Journal of Science Communication, 163, 51–59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strunk, W., Jr., & White, E. B. (1979). The elements of style (3rd ed.). New York: MacMillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mettam, G. R., & Adams, L. B. (1999). How to prepare an electronic version of your article. In B. S. Jones & R. Z. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to the electronic age (pp. 281–304). New York: E-Publishing Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fachinger, J., den Exter, M., Grambow, B., Holgerson, S., Landesmann, C., Titov, M., et al. (2004). Behavior of spent HTR fuel elements in aquatic phases of repository host rock formations, 2nd International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology. Beijing, China, paper #B08.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fachinger, J. (2006). Behavior of HTR fuel elements in aquatic phases of repository host rock formations. Nuclear Engineering & Design, 236, 54.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.11.023]Search in Google Scholar
[Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.]Search in Google Scholar
[Amir, E., Kallunki, J.-P., & Nilsson, H. (2014). The association between individual audit partners’ risk preferences and the composition of their client portfolios. Review of Accounting Studies, 19/1, 103-133.10.1007/s11142-013-9245-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ashton, R. & Kramer, S. (1980). Students as Surrogates in Behavioural Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting Research, 1–15.10.2307/2490389]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64/6(1), 359-372.10.1037/h0043445]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bigus, J. (2007). Die Sorgfaltsanreize des Wirtschaftsprüfers bei beschränkter Haftung. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Vol. 59 No.1, pp. 61-86.10.1007/BF03372781]Search in Google Scholar
[Bigus, J. (2011). Auditors’ liability with overcompensation and reputation losses. OR Spectrum, 33/2, 287-307.10.1007/s00291-011-0240-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bonner, S. (1994). A model of the effects of audit task complexity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19, 213–234.10.1016/0361-3682(94)90033-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bonner, S. (2008). Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall;, N.J.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonner, S. & Sprinkle, G. (2002). The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance - theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27/4-5, 303–345.10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00052-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bowrin, A. R. & King, J. (2010). Time pressure, task complexity, and audit effectiveness. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25 (2), 160-181.10.1108/02686901011008963]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, D. (1988). Task Complexity - A Review and Analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13, 40–52.10.2307/258353]Search in Google Scholar
[Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174794]Search in Google Scholar
[Chan, S. H. (2005). A motivational framework for understanding IS use and decision performance. Review of Business Information Systems, 9/4, 101-117.10.19030/rbis.v9i4.4446]Search in Google Scholar
[Chan, S. H., Qian S. & Lee J. Y. (2014). The Impact of Task Complexity, Task Motivation, Decision Support System (DSS) Motivation, and DSS Use on Performance. PACIS (2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Chan, S. & Song, Q. (2010). Motivational Framework: Insights into Decision Support System Use and Decision Performance. In: M. Cioca & L.-I. Cioca (Eds.), Decision Support Systems used in Disaster Management. INTECH Open Access Publisher.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chan, S., Song, Q. & Yao, L. (2014). The Impact of Task Complexity, Task Motivation, Decision Support System (DSS) Motivation, and DSS Use on Judgment Performance. PACIS 2014 Proceedings, 292.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chung, J. & Monroe, G. (2001). A research note on the effects of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, 111–125.10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.111]Search in Google Scholar
[DeFond, M. L. & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 58/2/3, 275–326.10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[DeZoort, T., Harrison, P. & Taylor, M. (2006). Accountability and auditors’ materiality judgments: The effects of differential pressure strength on conservatism, variability, and effort. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31/4, 373–390.10.1016/j.aos.2005.09.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dusenbury, R., Reimers, J. & Wheeler, S. (2000). The audit risk model: An empirical test for conditional dependencies among assessed component risks. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(2),105-117.10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.105]Search in Google Scholar
[Dye, R. (1995). Incorporation and the audit market. Journal of Accounting & Economics 19, 75–114.10.1016/0165-4101(94)00375-F]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Eccles, J. S. P. & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the Mind of the Actor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215-225.10.1177/0146167295213003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Eccles, J.S.P. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132.10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153]Search in Google Scholar
[Eccles, J. S. P., Adler, T., Futterman, R., Goff, S., Kaczala, C., Meece, J. & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In: J. Spence (Eds.), Achievement and Achievement Motives, New York: W. H. Freeman and Co., 75-146.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eysenck, M. (1986). A Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, London: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Farmer, T. A. (1993). Testing the Effect of Risk Attitude on Auditor Judgment Using Multiattribute Utility Theory. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 8(1), 91–110.10.1177/0148558X9300800106]Search in Google Scholar
[Fatemi, D. J. (2012). An Experimental Investigation of the Influence of Audit Fee Structure and Auditor Selection Rights on Auditor Independence and Client Investment Decisions. Auditing a Journal of Practice and Theory, 31(3), 75-94.10.2308/ajpt-10289]Search in Google Scholar
[Fisher, C.W., Chengalur-Smith, I. & Ballou, D.P. (2003). The impact of experience and time on the use of data quality information in decision making. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 170-188.10.1287/isre.14.2.170.16017]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Funke, J. (1991). Solving complex problems: Exploration and control of complex systems. In: R. J. Sternberg & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 185-222). Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 185-222.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gill, T. G. & Hicks, R. C. (2006). Task Complexity and Informing Science: A Synthesis. Informing Science, 1–30.10.28945/3045]Search in Google Scholar
[Gronewold, U. (2006). Die Beweiskraft von Beweisen: Audit Evidence bei betriebswirtschaftlichen Prüfungen. Düsseldorf: IDW Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hadrdies, K., Breesch, D. & Branson, J. (2013). Gender differences in overconfidence and risk taking: Do self-selection and socialization matter?. Economic Letters, 118(3), 442-444.10.1016/j.econlet.2012.12.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hidi, S. & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2001). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151-180.10.3102/00346543070002151]Search in Google Scholar
[Hollander, M. & Wolfe, D. (1999). Nonparametric statistical methods, Wiley-Interscience.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holt, C. & Laury, S. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentives Effects. American Economic Review 92, 1644-1655.10.1257/000282802762024700]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Humphrey, M. & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, Motivation, and Performance - A Theory of the Relationship between Individual Differences and Information Processing. Psychological Review, 153–184.10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.153]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jacko, J.A. & Salvendi, G. (1996). Hierarchical menu design: Breadth, depth and task complexity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1187-1201.10.2466/pms.1996.82.3c.1187]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Johnstone, K. M. (2000). Client-Acceptance Decisions: Simultaneous Effects of Client Business Risk, Audit Risk, Auditor Business Risk, and Risk Adaptation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(1), 1–25.10.2308/aud.2000.19.1.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation Theory and Industrial and Organizational Psychology. In: M. Dunnette, & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 57 – 170), Paolo Alto: Consulting Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klein, R. & Scholl, A. (2004). Planung und Entscheidung: Konzepte, Modelle und Methoden einer modernen betriebswirtschaftlichen Entscheidungsanalyse. München: Vahlen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klemz, B.R. & Gruca, T.S. (2003). Dueling or the battle royale? The impact of task complexity on the evaluation of entry threat. Psychology & Marketing, 20(11), 999-1016.10.1002/mar.10106]Search in Google Scholar
[Klersey, G.F. & Roberts, M.L (2010). Audit partners’ individual risk preferences in client retention decisions. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 14(2), 115-129.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laux, H., Gillenkirch, R. & Schenk-Mathes, M. (2014). Entscheidungstheorie. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-55258-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lawler, E. (1994). Motivation in Work Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lehtinen, A. & Kvist, L. (2018). Gender, Independence and Risk Preference: A quantitative study of listed Swedish companies. Umea University: Independent Thesis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mala, R. & Chand, P. (2015). Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Auditing and Accounting: Future Research Implications of Person, Task, and Environment Perspective. Accounting Perspectives, 14, 1–50.10.1111/1911-3838.12040]Search in Google Scholar
[McClelland, D. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton: Van Nostrand Company Inc.10.1037/14359-000]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, C., Fedor, D. & Ramsay, R. (2006). Effects of Discussion of Audit Reviews on Au-ditors’ Motivation and Performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 18, 135–146.10.2308/bria.2006.18.1.135]Search in Google Scholar
[Mohd Iskandar, T., Nelly Sari, R., Mohd-Sanusi, Z. & Anugerah, R. (2012). Enhancing audi-tors’ performance. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(5), 462–476.10.1108/02686901211227959]Search in Google Scholar
[Mohd-Sanusi, Z. & Mohd-Iskandar, T. (2007). Audit judgment performance: Assessing the effect of performance incentives, effort and task complexity. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22, 34–52.10.1108/02686900710715639]Search in Google Scholar
[Mohd-Sanusi, Z., Mohd-Iskandar, T. & Poon, J. (2007). Effects of goal orientation and task complexity on audit judgment performance. Malaysian Accounting Review, 6, 123-139.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, M. & Tan, H. (2005). Judgment and Decision Making Research in Auditing: A Task, Person, and Interpersonal Interaction Perspective. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Supplement 2005, 24, 41-71.10.2308/aud.2005.24.Supplement.41]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Donnell, E. & Johnson, E. N. (2001). The Effects of Auditor Gender and Task Complexity on Information Processing Efficiency. International Journal of Auditing, 5(2), 91–105.10.1111/j.1099-1123.2001.00328.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Pablo, A, Sitkin, S. & Jemison, D. (1996). Acquisition Decision-Making Processes: The Central Role of Risk. Journal of Management, 22, 723-746.10.1177/014920639602200503]Search in Google Scholar
[Pintrich, P. R. & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33]Search in Google Scholar
[Pintrich, P. R. & Schrauben, B., (1992). Student perceptions in the classroom. In: D.H. Schunk, & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149-183). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prawitt, D. (1995). Staffing Assignments for Judgment-Oriented Audit Tasks: The Effects of Structured Audit Technology and Environment. The Accounting Review, 443–465.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pummerer, E., Steller, M. & Baldauf, J. (2013). Prüfungsqualität, Prüferhaftung und Risiko-aversion: Eine analytische Betrachtung der Bedeutung der Risikoaversion für die Prüfungsqualität. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 1, 32–59.10.1007/BF03373708]Search in Google Scholar
[Quick, R. (2005). Unabhängigkeit des Abschlussprüfers im Spiegel der Wissenschaft. In: A. Haller (Eds.). Wirtschaftsprüfung und Corporate Governance in Österreich (pp. 91-143), Wien: Linde.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynaud, A. & Couture, S. (2012). Stability of risk preference measure: results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and Decision, Vol. 73 No. 2, pp. 203-221.10.1007/s11238-012-9296-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Rheinberg, F. (2010). Intrinsische Motivation und Flow-Erleben. In: J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation und Handeln (pp. 365-387), Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-12693-2_14]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). When rewards compete with nature - The undermining of intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. In: C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance (pp. 257-307), San Diego: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012619070-0/50024-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R. & Deci, E. L. (1991). Ego-involved persistence – When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 185–205.10.1007/BF00995170]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific studies of reading, 3(3), 257-279.10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schwind, J. (2011). Die Informationsverarbeitung von Wirtschaftsprüfern bei der Prüfung geschätzter Werte: Eine verhaltenswissenschaftliche und empirische Analyse, Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.10.1007/978-3-8349-6225-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Simunic, D. & Stein, M. (1996). Impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15, 119–134.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sitkin, S. B. & Weingart, L. R. (1992). Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Prospensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(69, 1573-1592.10.2307/256844]Search in Google Scholar
[Stone, D. N. & Kadous, K. (1997). The joint effects of task-related negative affect and task difficulty in multiattribute choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(2), 159-174.10.1006/obhd.1997.2703]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tan, H.-T. & Kao, A. (1999). Accountability Effects on Auditors’ Performance - The Influence of Knowledge, Problem-Solving Ability, and Task Complexity. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(19), 209–223.10.2307/2491404]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, K. W. & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment - An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.10.5465/amr.1990.4310926]Search in Google Scholar
[Touré-Tillery, M. & Fishbach, A. (2014). How to measure Motivation: A Guide for the Experimental Social Psychologist. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 328-341.10.1111/spc3.12110]Search in Google Scholar
[Utman, C. H. (1997). Performance effects of motivational state - A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 170-182.10.1207/s15327957pspr0102_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagenhofer, A. & Ewert, R. (2007). Externe Unternehmensrechnung. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber, E., Blais, A. & Betz, N. (2002). A Domain-specific Risk-attitude Scale, in Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263-290.10.1002/bdm.414]Search in Google Scholar
[Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. P. (1992). The development of achievement task values - a theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zuber, M. & Guthier, M. (2003). Verfahren zur Erhebung der Risikoeinstellung in der Kapitalanlageberatung. Jahrbuch der Absatz- und Verbrauchsforschung, 49/4.]Search in Google Scholar
