[BURRET, H. T. – FELD, L. P. 2018. Vertical effects of fiscal rules: the Swiss experience. In International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 25, 2018, no. 3, pp. 673–721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9467-y10.1007/s10797-017-9467-y]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[BRYSON, P. J. 2016. User Fees in Local Finance: Performance and Potential in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In P. J. Bryson (Ed.), The Economics of Centralism and Local Autonomy. Fiscal Decentralization in the Czech and Slovak Republics. New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, pp. 95–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/978023011201810.1057/9780230112018]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[BRYSON, P. J. – CORNIA, G. C. 2000. Fiscal decentralisation in economic transformation: the Czech and Slovak cases. In Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 52, 2000, no. 3, pp. 507–522. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/71366306410.1080/713663064]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[CSŰRÖS, G. 2014. Changes in Hungarian local government system. In Bódi, F. – Fábián, G. – Fónai, M. – Kurkinen, J. – Lawson, T.R. – Pietiläinen, H. (Eds.). Access to services in rural areas: A comparison of Finland and Hungary. Bremen : Europaeischer Hochschulverlag, 2014, pp. 71–88.]Search in Google Scholar
[DAFFLON, B. 2010. Local Debt: from Budget Responsibility to Fiscal Discipline. In IEB 6th Symposium on Fiscal Federalism, Barcelona, June 14–15. Retrieved from http://commonweb.unifr.ch/EcoDean/Pub/telecharg/wp/417.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[DAVEY, K. – PETERI, G. 1998. Local Government Finances: Options for Reform. Nagykovacsi : Local Government Know-How Programme, 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[DUVE, T. – DRESCHSLER, W. 2011. Insolvent local government: German approach prevention. In Central European Public Administration Review, vol. 9, 2011, no. 2, pp. 7–36. Retrieved from http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/17410.17573/cepar.v9i2.174]Search in Google Scholar
[FÁBIÁN, A. 2017. Local self-government in Hungary: The impact of crisis. In Nunes, S.C. – Buček, J. (Eds.). Local government and urban governance in Europe. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2017, (pp. 71–87). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43979-210.1007/978-3-319-43979-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[FOREMNY, D. 2014. Sub-national deficits in European countries: The impact of fiscal rules and tax autonomy. In European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 34, 2014, pp. 86–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.01.00310.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.01.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HABÁNIK, J. – KORDOŠ, M. – HOŠTÁK, P. 2016. Competitiveness of Slovak economy and regional development policies. In Journal of International Studies, vol. 9, 2016, no. 1, pp. 144–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-1/1010.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-1/10]Search in Google Scholar
[HEIJDRA, B. J. – MEIJDAM, L. 2002. Public investment and intergenerational distribution. In Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 26, 2002, no. 5, pp. 707–735. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(00)00074-910.1016/S0165-1889(00)00074-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[KECSKÉS, A. 2016. The European system of responsible corporate governance. In Európai Jog (European Law), vol. 16, 2016, no. 3, pp. 28–38. Retrieved from http://real.mtak.hu/id/eprint/40411 (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[KECSŐ, G. 2016. Financial legal status of local governments: Models of legal institutions that determine status are on the revenue side. England – USA – Hungary. Budapest : ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, 2016. Retrieved from http://eotvospontok.hu/a-helyionkormanyzatok-penzugyi-jogi-jogallasa (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[LENTNER, Cs. 2014. The Debt Consolidation of Hungarian Local Governments. In Public Finance Quarterly, 2014, no. 3, pp. 310–325. Retrieved from https://www.asz.hu/storage/files/files/public-finance-quarterly-articles/2014/a_lentnercs_2014_3.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[LEVAGGI, R. – ZANOLA, R. 2003. Flypaper effect and sluggishness: Evidence from regional health expenditure in Italy. In International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 10, 2003, no. 5, pp. 535–547. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102611822290110.1023/A:1026118222901]Search in Google Scholar
[MONACELLI, D. – PAZIENZA, M. G. – RAPALLINI, C. 2016. Municipality budget rules and debt: Is the Italian regulation effective? In Public Budgeting and Finance, vol. 36, 2016, no. 3, pp. 114–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.1209410.1111/pbaf.12094]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MUSGRAVE, R. A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. New York : McGrow-Hill, 1959.]Search in Google Scholar
[NIŽŇANSKÝ, V. – CIBÁKOVÁ, V. – HAMALOVÁ, J. 2014. The third stage of decentralization of public administration in Slovakia. Bratislav a: Wolters Kluwer, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.wolterskluwer.sk/sk/tretia-etapa-decentralizacie-verejnej-spravy-naslovensku.p1906.html (in Slovak)]Search in Google Scholar
[OTRUSINOVÁ, M. 2016. Public sector accounting in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In Administratie si Management Public, 2016, no. 27, pp. 30–45. Retrieved from http://www.ramp.ase.ro/en/_data/files/articole/2016/27-02.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[ROSTA, M. 2012. Correlation Between New Public Management and Zoltán Magyary’s Public Administration Development Programme. In Polgári Szemle (Civic Review), 2012, no. 8, pp. 3–6. Retrieved from https://polgariszemle.hu/archivum/114-2012-december-8-evfolyam-3-6-szam/szemelvenyek-az-allam-es-kozigazgatas-tudomanybol/496-az-uj-koezszolgalati-menedzsment-es-a-magyary-zoltan-koezigazgatas-fejlesztesi-program-viszonyarol (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[TER-MINASSIAN, T. – CRAIGH, J. 1997. Control of subnational government borrowing. In Ter-Minassian, T. (Eds.). Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice. Washington : International Monetary Fund, 1997, pp. 156–172.]Search in Google Scholar
[TORMA, A. 2011. On the European Administrative Space – from a Hungarian perspective. In Miskolci Jogi Szemle (Miskolc Law Review), 2011, 6 (special issue), pp. 196–210. Retrieved from http://midra.uni-miskolc.hu/document/12688/4763.pdf (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[URYSZEK, T. 2015. Sustainable public finance – illusion or reality? Evidence from old EU member states. In Journal of International Studies, vol. 8, 2015, no. 1, pp. 22–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-1/210.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-1/2]Search in Google Scholar
[VAN ROMPUY, P. 2016. Sub-national tax autonomy and deficits: Empirical results for 27 OECD countries. In Regional Studies, vol. 50, 2016, no. 7, pp. 1248–1259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.100793710.1080/00343404.2015.1007937]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[ZÉMAN, Z. 2017. The risk-mitigating role of financial controlling at local government entities. In Public Finance Quarterly, 2017, no. 3, pp. 294–310. Retrieved from https://www.penzugyiszemle.hu/pfq/upload/pdf/penzugyi_szemle_angol/volume_62_2017_3/zeman_2017_3a.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[ZÉMAN, Z. – TÓTH, A. 2015. Performance evaluation of local governments and utilities companies. In Lentner, Cs. (Eds.). Tax Finance and Public Finance: Public Finance II. Budapest : NKE Szolgáltató Kft, 2015, pp. 829–853. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312490088_Adozasi_Penzugytan_es_Allamhaztartasi_Gazdalkodas (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar