[Desvousges , W. H. - Reed Johnson, F. - Dunford, R. W. - Boyle, K. J. - Hudson, S. P. - Wilson, K. N. 1993. Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: tests of validity and reliability. In: Hausman, J. A. (Ed.), Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1993. pp. 91-164.]Search in Google Scholar
[Easley, R. F. - Valacich , J. S. - Vendataramanan , M. A. 2000. Capturing group preferences in a multicriteria decision. In: European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, no. 125, p. 73-83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Forman , E. - Peniwati , K. 1998. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: European Journal for Operational Research, 1998, no. 108, pp. 165-169.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gass, S.I. - Rapcsák, T. 2004. Singular Value Decomposition in AHP. In: European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, no. 154, p. 573-584.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, C. - McVittie , A. - Moran , D. 2004. What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods. In: Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 20, 2004, no. 2, p. 211-225.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanemann , W. M. 1994. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives, no. 8, 1994, p. 19-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanley, N. - Shogren, J. F. - White, B. 1997. Environmental Economics. London : Macmillan Press, 1997. ISBN 0 333 58236 5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman , D. - Knetsch , J. L. 1992. Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. In. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1992, no. 22, p. 57-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman , D. 1986. Comments. In: Cummings, R. G. - Brookshire, D. S. - Schulze, W. D. (Eds), Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Rowman & Allanheld, Totowa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kallas , Z. - Gómez-Limón, A. - Hulé, J. B. 2007. Decomposing the Value of Agricultural Multifunctionality: Combining Contingent Valuation and the Analytical Hierarchy Process. In: Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 58, 2008, no. 2, p. 218-241.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kriströmm, B. 1995. A Non-parametric Approach to the Estimation of Welfare Measures in Discrete Responses Valuation Studies. In: Land Economics, vol. 66, 1995, no. 2, p. 135-139.]Search in Google Scholar
[Křůmalov á, V. 2002. Evaluation of chosen benefits on environment and landscape coming from Czech agriculture. In: Agricultural Economics, vol. 48, 2002, no. 1, p. 13-17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kubíčkov á, S. 2004. Contingent Valuation of the Landscape Amenity Function of Agriculture in the White Carpathians Protected Landscape Area. Development of the Czech Society in the European Union: V. Lectures in Non-market Valuation Methods in the Environmental Area, Charles University in Prague, Matfyzpress, 2004, p. 259-268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsden, T. - Murdoch, J. 2006. Introduction between the Local and the Global: Confronting Complexity in the Contemporary Food Sector, in Terry Marsden, Jonathan Murdoch (ed.) Between the Local and the Global. Research in Rural Sociology and Development, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12, 2006, pp.1-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsden, T. - Sonnino, R. 2005. Rural development and agri-food governance in Europe: tracing the development of alternatives. In: Higgins, V., Lawrence, G. (Eds.), Agricultural Governance: Globalization and the New Politics of Regulation. London : Routledge, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsden, D. 2003. Adapting European labour institutions to global economic and technical change. In: Touffut, Jean-Phillipe, (ed.) Institutions, innovation and growth: selected economic papers. Edward Elgar/Saint-Gobain Centre for Economic Studies, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 45-67. ISBN 9781843765271.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mitchell , R. C. - Carson, R. T. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2003. Multifunctionality: The Policy Implications. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Publications. Available at: http://www.oecd.org.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ploeg , J. D. van der - Long, A. - Banks, J. (eds). 2002. Living Countrysides. Rural development processes in Europe: the state of art, Elsevier B.I., Doetinchem.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ploeg , J. D. van der, et al. 2000. Rural development: from practices and policies towards theory, in Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40, 2000, no. 4, pp. 391-408.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1980.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saaty, T. L. 1991. Response to Holder’s comments on the analytic hierarchy process. In: The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1991, no. 42, p. 909-914.]Search in Google Scholar
[Samples , K. - Hollyer, P. 1990. Contingent valuation of wildlife resources in the presence of substitutes and complements. In: Johnson, R. L. - Johnson, G. V. (Eds.). In: Economic Valuation of Natural Resources. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1990, pp. 177-192.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schkade , D. A. - Payne, J. W. 1993. Where do the numbers come from? how people respond to contingent valuation questions. In: Hausman, J. A. (Ed.). Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. North Holland Press, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 271-304]Search in Google Scholar
[Stevens , T. H. - Echeverria , J. - Glass , R. J. - Hager , T. - Moore, T. A. 1991. Measuring the existence value of wildlife: what do CVM estimates really show? In: Land Economics, 1991, no. 67, p. 390-400. ]Search in Google Scholar
