[Anderson, J. R. 1983. The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barlow, H. B. 1990. Conditions for versatile learning, Helmholtzs unconscious inference, and the
task of perception. Vision Research, 30: 1561-1571.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22: 577-660.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bechtel, W., and Abrahamsen, A. 2002. Connectionism and the mind: Parallel processing,
dynamics, and evolution in networks. Second Edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culicover, P. W., and Jackendoff, R. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edelman, S. 2008. Computing the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fillmore, C. J. 1965. Indirect object constructions and the ordering of transformations. The Hague:
Mouton.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fodor, J. A., and Pylyshyn, Z. 1988. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis.
Cognition. 28: 371.10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fodor, J. A. 2000. The mind doesn’t work that way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4627.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions. Chigago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hadley, R. 2008. The problem of rapid variable creation. Neural Computation, 20: 123.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harnad, S. 1991. The symbol grounding problem. In S. Forrest (ed.) Emergent computation: Selforganizing
, collective, and cooperative phenomena in natural and artificial computing networks.
Cambridge, (pp. 335-346). MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harris, Z. S. 1968. Mathematical structures of language. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hebb, D. O. 1949. The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackendoff, R., and Pinker, S. 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for the
evolution of language. Cognition, 97: 211-225.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind.
Chigago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcus, G. F. 2001. The algebraic mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1187.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mojsilovic, A. 2005. A computational model for color naming and describing color composition of
images. IEEE Transactions on Image processing, 14: 690-699.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newell, A. 1990. Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piaget, J. 1950. The Psychology of Intelligence. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pinker, S. 1998. How the mind works. London: Penguin.10.1037/e412892005-002]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roy, D. 2005. Grounding words in perception and action: computational insights. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 9: 389- 395.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thompson, P. W. 1995. Constructivism, cybernetics, and information processing: Implications for
research on mathematical learning. In L. P. Streffe and J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education
(pp. 123-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thórisson, K. R. 2009. From constructionist to constructivist A.I. Keynote, AAAI Fall Symposium-
Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 175-183. AAI Tech Report FS-09-01, AAAI press,
Menlo Park, CA.]Search in Google Scholar
[
van der Velde, F., and de Kamps, M. 2006. Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial
structures in cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29: 37-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[
van der Velde, F., and de Kamps, M. 2010. Learning of control in a neural architecture of grounded
language processing. Cognitive Systems Research, 11: 93107.]Search in Google Scholar
[
van der Velde, F., and de Kamps, M. 2011. Compositional connectionist structures based on in situ
grounded representations. Connection Science, 23: 97-107.]Search in Google Scholar
[
van der Velde, F. 2010. Where Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience Meet: The Search
for Grounded Architectures of Cognition. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 2010: 1-18.
doi:10.1155/2010/918062.10.1155/2010/918062]Search in Google Scholar
