[Abudabos A. (2010). The effect of broiler breeder strain and parent flock age on hatchability and fertile hatchability. Int. J. Poultry Sci., 9: 231-235.]Search in Google Scholar
[Adamski M. (2008). Relationships between the morphological composition of eggs and the hatchability of chicks of selected bird species (in Polish). Rozprawa 130. Wyd. UTP, Bydgoszcz, 103 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Akyurek H., Okur A.A. (2009). Effect of storage time, temperature and hen age on egg quality in free-range layer hens. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 8: 1953-1958.]Search in Google Scholar
[Amem H.M.M., A l - Daraji J.H. (2011). Zinc improves egg quality in Cobb 500 broiler breeder females. Int. J. Poultry Sci., 10: 471-476.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arad Z., Marder J. (1982). Egg-shell water vapour conductance of the domestic fowl: comparison between two breeds and their crosses. Brit. Poultry Sci., 23: 325-328.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bennett D. (1992). The influence of shell thickness on hatchability in commercial broiler breeder flocks. J. Appl. Poultry Res., 1: 61-65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cherian G. (2008). Egg quality and yolk polyunsaturated fatty acid status in relation to broiler breeder hen age and dietary n-3 oils. Poultry Sci., 87: 1131-1137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christensen V.L. (1983). Distribution of pores on hatching and nonhatching turkey eggs. Poultry Sci., 62: 1312-1316.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dohnal J.M., Kie łczewski K., Pospiech M., Łakota P. (1989). Genetic relationship between egg shell quality and hatchability of eggs from laying hens (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Drob., 6: 5-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dohnal J.M., Kowalska H., Kie łczewski K., Pospiech M. (1986). An attempt to estimate the relationships between specific gravity and other quality traits of eggs from five crosses of laying hens (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Drob., 3: 5-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dohnal J.M., Pospiech M., Kie łczewski K., Kowalska H. (1988). Studies on egg specific gravity in flocks of white and brown egg layers (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Drob., 5: 67-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[González M. (1995). Influence of age on physical traits of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) eggs. Ann. Zootech., 44: 307-312.]Search in Google Scholar
[Khurshid A., Farooq M., Durrani F.R., Sarbiland K., Manzoor A. (2004). Hatching performance of Japanese quails. Livest. Res. Rural. Dev., 16, 2, http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/1/khur161.htm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kontecka H., W o źnicka J., Witkiewicz K., Nowaczewski S. (2011). Laying, egg and hatchability characteristics in ostrich (Struthio camelus) at different age. Folia Biol., 59: 163-167.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kul S., Seker I. (2004). Phenotypic correlations between some external and internal egg quality traits in the Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). J. Poultry Sci., 3: 400-405.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lapao C., Gama L.T., Chaveiro Soares M. (1999). Effects of broiler breeder age and length of egg storage on albumen characteristics and hatchability. Poultry Sci., 78: 640-645.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowaczewski S., Kontecka H., Rosiński A., Koberling S., Koronowski P. (2010 a). Egg quality of Japanese quail depends on layer age and storage time. Folia Biol. (Kraków), 58: 201-207.10.3409/fb58_3-4.201-20720968187]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowaczewski S., Witkiewicz K., F r ątczak M., Kontecka H., Rutkowski A., Krystianiak S., Rosiński A. (2008). Egg quality from domestic and French guinea fowl. Nauka Przyr. Technol., 2: 1-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowaczewski S., Witkiewicz K., Kontecka H., Krystianiak S., Rosiński A. (2010 b). Eggs weight of Japanese quail vs. eggs quality after storage time and hatchability results. Arch. Tierz., 53: 720-731.10.5194/aab-53-720-2010]Search in Google Scholar
[Peebles E.D., Brake J. (1987). Eggshell quality and hatchability in broiler breeder eggs. Poultry Sci., 66: 596-604.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pirsaraei Z.A., Saki A.A., Kazemi Fard M., Saleh H. (2011). Effect of dietary tallow level on broiler breeder performance and hatching egg characteristics. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 10: 1287-1291.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reijrink I.A.M., Meijerhof R., Kemp B., Van Den Brand H. (2008). The chicken embryo and its micro environment during egg storage and early incubation. World Poultry Sci. J., 64: 581-598.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sahin E.A., Sengor E., Yardimci M., Cetingul I.S. (2009). Relationship between pre-incubation egg parameters from old breeder hens, egg hatchability and chick weight. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 8: 115-119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szczerbińska D. (1996). Eggshell quality and hatchability in two breeds of laying hens (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. AR Szczecin, 169, Zootechnika, 33: 77-85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szczerbińska D. (1997). Changes in egg quality in hens from K66 line during year-long reproductive utilization (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. AR Szczecin, 176, Zootechnika, 34: 109-117.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tona K., Onagbesan O., De Ketelaere B., Decuypere E., Bruggeman V. (2004). Effects of age of broiler breeders and egg storage on egg quality, hatchability, chick quality, chick weight, and chick posthatch growth to forty-two days. J. Appl. Poultry Res., 13: 10-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tullett S.G. (1984). The porosity of avian eggshells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 78 A, 1: 5-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tyler C. (1953). Studies on egg shells. II-A Method for marking and counting pores. J. Sci. Food Agric., 4, 266-272.10.1002/jsfa.2740040603]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Den Brand H., Parmentier H.K., Kemp B. (2004). Effects of housing system (outdoor vs cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. Brit. Poultry Sci., 45: 745-752.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams K.C. (1992). Some factors affecting albumen quality with particular reference to Haugh unit score. World Poultry Sci. J., 48: 5-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yilmaz A.A., Bozkurt Z. (2009). Effects of hen age, storage period and stretch film packaging on internal and external quality traits of table eggs. Lucrări ştiinţifice Zootehnie şi Biotehnologii, 42: 462-469.]Search in Google Scholar