<abstract xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><bold>Problem:</bold> The main objectives of this study were to identify differences in the psychosocial status of military personnel who had and who had no traumatic event experience, and to screen for potential mental health vulnerability related to post-traumatic stress.<bold>Methods:</bold> 390 military personnel were included in the study, with 103 of them reporting traumatic event experience. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Screening for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, the CAGE instrument, the Eysenck Personality Scales, the Folkman-Lazarus Ways of Coping Questionnaire, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale and self-evaluative questions about important relationships were administered.<bold>Results:</bold> The respondents who reported traumatic event experience (TEE) also reported a significantly higher frequency of other stressful events, a significantly more frequent past history of depression (16.5 % of respondents with TEE and 6.2 % of respondents without TEE) and significantly higher risky alcohol drinking; the latter, however, is not higher than the estimate for the total Slovenian population (10.7 % of respondents with TEE and 2.7 % of participants without TEE). Respondents with TEE smoke less frequently than respondents who reported no TEE (46.6 % vs. 60.1 %), and more often rely on self in stressful situations. There was no significant difference between the respondents with reported TEE and those without TEE in their personality traits, coping styles, and self-esteem, or in the majority of job- and family-related factors. No difference was found between male and female personnel as concerns intra-personal factors and in stress-related behaviour.<bold>Conclusions:</bold> Intra-personal factors (personality, coping styles, and self-esteem) of military personnel indicate good personal potential for resilience. Stress-related substance (ab)use, especially smoking rates well above the Slovenian average, need further attention. Professional support needs to be promoted, especially in female personnel, who are less likely than men to seek social support in times of stress, and in military personnel exposed to cumulative stressors.</abstract>

Problem: The main objectives of this study were to identify differences in the psychosocial status of military personnel who had and who had no traumatic event experience, and to screen for potential mental health vulnerability related to post-traumatic stress.Methods: 390 military personnel were included in the study, with 103 of them reporting traumatic event experience. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Screening for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, the CAGE instrument, the Eysenck Personality Scales, the Folkman-Lazarus Ways of Coping Questionnaire, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale and self-evaluative questions about important relationships were administered.Results: The respondents who reported traumatic event experience (TEE) also reported a significantly higher frequency of other stressful events, a significantly more frequent past history of depression (16.5 % of respondents with TEE and 6.2 % of respondents without TEE) and significantly higher risky alcohol drinking; the latter, however, is not higher than the estimate for the total Slovenian population (10.7 % of respondents with TEE and 2.7 % of participants without TEE). Respondents with TEE smoke less frequently than respondents who reported no TEE (46.6 % vs. 60.1 %), and more often rely on self in stressful situations. There was no significant difference between the respondents with reported TEE and those without TEE in their personality traits, coping styles, and self-esteem, or in the majority of job- and family-related factors. No difference was found between male and female personnel as concerns intra-personal factors and in stress-related behaviour.Conclusions: Intra-personal factors (personality, coping styles, and self-esteem) of military personnel indicate good personal potential for resilience. Stress-related substance (ab)use, especially smoking rates well above the Slovenian average, need further attention. Professional support needs to be promoted, especially in female personnel, who are less likely than men to seek social support in times of stress, and in military personnel exposed to cumulative stressors.

Intra- and inter-personal factors of psychosocial status in Slovenian military personnel with regard to their traumatic event experience

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

University Psychiatric Hospital Ljubljana & Chair of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Slovenian Journal of Public Health

Problem: The main objectives of this study were to identify differences in the psychosocial status of military personnel who had and who had no traumatic event...

Intra- and inter-personal factors of psychosocial status in Slovenian military personnel with regard to their traumatic event experience

Published Online: Jul 11, 2011

Page range: 201 - 211

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10152-010-0045-2

Keywords
travma, obvladovanje, psihosocialni status, vojaško osebje, spol

This content is open access.

Intra- and inter-personal factors of psychosocial status in Slovenian military personnel with regard to their traumatic event experience

Published Online: Jul 11, 2011

Page range: 201 - 211

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10152-010-0045-2

Keywordstravma, obvladovanje, psihosocialni status, vojaško osebje, spol

This content is open access.

Keywords
travma, obvladovanje, psihosocialni status, vojaško osebje, spol