Ecological Scarcity Method: Adaptation and Implementation for Different Countries

1. Finkbeiner M., Inaba A., Tan R. B.H. et al. The new International Standards for Life Cycle Assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. Int JLCA, 2006, 11(2), p.80-85.10.1065/lca2006.02.002Search in Google Scholar

2. Frischknecht R., Steiner R., Braunschweig A., et al. Swiss EcologicalScarcity Method: The New Version 2006. http://www.esu-services.ch/Search in Google Scholar

3. Miyazaki N., Siegenthaler C.P., Azuma K., et al. PracticalApplication of JEPIX: Method for Ecological Accounting and Life cycleImpact Assessment for Japan based on the EcoScarcity Principle, JEPIXForum 2003. Mitaka, Tokyo,2004.Search in Google Scholar

4. Miyazaki N.. Applying EcoBalance to Management Control:Combining Economic and Ecological Accounting, Second Asian-Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

5. Ciroth A., Hagelüken M., Sonnemann G., et al. Geographical and Technological Differences in Lyfe cycle Inventories. Part I. Int J LCA, 2002, 7(5), p.295-300.10.1007/BF02978891Search in Google Scholar

6. Nelson G. C, Bennett E., Berhe A. A., et al. Antropogenic Drivers of Ecosystem Change: an Overview. Ecology and Society 11(2): 29. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art29/.10.5751/ES-01826-110229Search in Google Scholar

7. Van den Berg M., Birnbaum L.S., Denison M. , et al. REVIEW: The2005 World Health Organization Revaluation of Human andMammalian Toxic Equivalency Factors for Dioxins and Dioxin-LikeCompounds. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES 93(2), 223-241 (2006)10.1093/toxsci/kfl055229074016829543Search in Google Scholar

8. THE WORLD BANK. Urban Development & Local Government Program. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTURBANDEVELOPMENT/Reso urces/336387-1169585750379/Brochure_6_pages.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

9. Saundry P.,Greenhouse Gas Control Policies in Russia. The Encyclopedia of Earth February 1, 2010; URL: http://www.eoearth.org/article/Greenhouse_Gas_Control_Policies_in_R ussiaSearch in Google Scholar

10. Weidema B.P., New Paradigm or Old Distance to Target? Environmental Science &Technology . 2012,46, p.570.Search in Google Scholar

11. Huijbregts M.A.J., Hellweg S., Herwich E.., Do We Need a Paradigm in Life Cycle Assessment? Environmental Science &Technology . 2011,45, p.3833-3834.Search in Google Scholar

12. Baumann H., Rydberg T.. A comparison of three methods for impact analysis and evaluation. J. Cleaner Prod. 1994, vol.2, 1, p.13-20.Search in Google Scholar

13. United Nation Framework Convention on Climate ChangeSearch in Google Scholar