[Adermann, V. (ed.). 2009. Eesti Metsad 2008. (Estonian Forests 2008). Tallinn, Metsakaitse- ja Metsauuenduskeskus. 134 pp. (In Estonian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Agestam, E. 1985. A growth simulator for mixed stands in Sweden and two examples of yield in birch-pine and birch spruce mixed stands. - Hägglund, B., Peterson, G. (eds). Broadleaves in Boreal Silviculture - an obstacle or an asset? Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Silviculture, Report No. 14, 235-252.]Search in Google Scholar
[Assmann, E. 1970. The Principles of Forest Yield Study.Oxford, Pergamon Press. 506 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burkhart, H.E., Tham, Å. 1992. Predictions from growth and yield models of the performance of mixed-species stands. - Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. The Ecology of Mixed-Species Stands of Trees. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 21-34.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ekö, P.M. 1985. A growth simulator for Swedish forests, based on data from the national forest survey.Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Silviculture, Report No. 16. 224 pp. (In Swedish with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Frivold, L.H., Frank, J. 2002. Growth of Mixed Birch- Coniferous Stands in Relation to Pure Coniferous Stands at Similar Sites in South-eastern Norway.Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 139-149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frivold, L. H., Mielikäinen, K. 1990. The effects of hardwoods on softwood growth in mixed stands in Fennoscandia. - Titus, B.D., Lavigne, M.B., Newton, P.F., Meades, W.J. (eds). The silvics and ecology of boreal spruces. Proceedings of the 11th IUFRO Northern Forest Silviculture and Management Working Party S1.05-12 Symposium, 12-17 August 1989, Central Newfoundland, Canada. Information Report - Newfoundland and Labrador Region, Forestry Canada 1990 No. N-X-271, 75-82.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gadow, K.v., Hui, G.Y. 1999. Modelling forest development.Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 212 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelty, M.J. 1992. Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands. - Kelty, M.J., Larson, B.C., Oliver, C.D. The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests. A Festschrift for David M. Smith. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 125-141.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kenk, G.K. 1992. Silviculture of mixed-species stands in Germany. - Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. The Ecology of Mixed-Species Stands of Trees. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 53-63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kiviste, A., Hordo, M. 2002. Eesti metsa kasvukäigu püsiproovitükkide võrgustik. (Network of permanent forest growth plots in Estonia). - Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 37, 43-58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knoke, T., Ammer, C., Stimm, B., Mosandl, R. 2008.Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics. - European Journal of Forest Research, 127, 89-101.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lappi-Seppälä, M. 1930. Research on the development of even-aged mixed pine-birch stands. - Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 15, 1-241. (In German with Finnish summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindén, M., Agestam, E., 2003. Increment and Yield in Mixed and Monoculture Stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies Based on an Experiment in Southern Sweden. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 155-162.10.1080/02827580310003722]Search in Google Scholar
[Lõhmus, E. 2006. Eesti metsakasvukohatüübid. (Estonian Forest Site Types). Tartu, Eesti Loodusfoto. 80 pp. (In Estonian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Mielikäinen, K. 1980. Structure and development of mixed pine and birch stands. - Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 99, 1-82. (In Finnish with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Mielikäinen, K. 1996. Approaches to Managing Birchdominated Mixed Stands in Finland. - Comeau, P.G., Thomas, K.D. Silviculture of Temperate and Boreal Broadleaf-conifer Mixtures. Victoria, B. C. Ministry of Forests. Forestry Division Services Branch. Production Resources, 8-14]Search in Google Scholar
[Porté, A., Bartelink, H. H. 2002. Modelling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management. - Ecological Modelling, 150, 141-188.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pretzsch, H. 2009. Forest dynamics, growth and yield.From measurement to model. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer. 664 pp.10.1007/978-3-540-88307-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Pretzsch, H., Schütze, G. 2009. Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual-tree level. - European Journal of Forest Research, 128, 183-204.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pukkala, T., Miina, J., Kurttila, M., Kolström, T. 1998. A spatial yield model for optimizing the thinning regime of mixed stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 31-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pukkala, T., Vettenranta, J., Kolström, T., Miina, J. 1994.Productivity of mixed stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 9, 143-153.]Search in Google Scholar
[Söderberg, U. 1986. Functions for forecasting of timber yields. Increment and form height for individual trees of native species in Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Section of Forest Mensuration and Management, Report No. 14. 251 pp. (In Swedish with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Valkonen, S., Ruuska, J. 2003. Effect of Betula Admixture on Tree Growth and Branch Diameter in Young Pinus sylvestris Stands in Southern Finland. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 416-426. ]Search in Google Scholar
