Trends in biodiversity research over two decades: paradigmatic finders keepers?

Bolen E. G. 1989. Conservation biology, wildlife management, and spaceship earth. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 17: 351-354.Search in Google Scholar

Bunnell F. L. & Dupris L. A. 1994. Canadian-based literature: Implications to conservation and management. Ecoscience 1: 87-92.10.1080/11956860.1994.11682232Search in Google Scholar

Bunnell F. L. & Dupris L. A. 1995. Conservation Biology's literature revisited: Wine or vinaigrette? Wildl. Soc. Bull. 23: 56-62.Search in Google Scholar

Caughley G. 1994. Directions in conservation biology. J. Animal. Ecol. 63: 215-244.10.2307/5542Search in Google Scholar

Clinchy M. & Krebs C. J. 1997. Viva Caughley! (a letter). Conserv. Biol. 11: 832-833.Search in Google Scholar

Cooley J. & Golley F. 1984. Trends in ecological research in the 1980s. NATO Conf. Ser. Vol 7. Plenum Publ. Group, New York.10.1007/978-1-4684-4898-6Search in Google Scholar

Deshmukh I. 1989. On the limited role of biologists in biological conservation. Conserv. Biol. 3: 521-522.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00093.xSearch in Google Scholar

Disney R. H. 1989. Does anyone care? Conserv. Biol. 4: 414.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00248.xSearch in Google Scholar

Edwards T. C. 1989. The Wildlife Society and the Society for Conservation Biology: Strange but unwilling bedfellows. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 17: 340-343.Search in Google Scholar

Ehrenfeld D. 1989. Is anyone listening? Conserv. Biol. 4: 414.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00249.xSearch in Google Scholar

France R. 1998. Putting genes back into their lab bottles: Much ado about nothing? Conserv. Biol. 12: 500-501.Search in Google Scholar

France R. 2001. Conservation biology: The newest tool in the biodiversity tool box. Biodiver. J. Life Earth. 2: 17-21.10.1080/14888386.2001.9712543Search in Google Scholar

France R. & Rigg C. 1998a. Survey of the global distribution of biodiversity research published in five international journals: Is there a tropical bias? Trop. Biodiver. 5: 161-166.Search in Google Scholar

France R. & Rigg C. 1998b. Examination of the ‘founder effect’ in biodiversity research: patterns and imbalances in the published literature. Diver. Distrib. 4: 77-86.10.1046/j.1472-4642.1998.00018.xSearch in Google Scholar

France R., Peters R. & Rigg C. 1998. Comparative assessment of regional representation and research productivity of conservation biologists and applied ecologists. Ecoscience 5: 561-567.10.1080/11956860.1998.11682490Search in Google Scholar

Hedrick P. W., Lacy R. C., Allendorf F. W. & Soule M. E. 1996. Directions in conservation biology: Comments on Caughley. Conserv. Biol. 10: 1312-1320.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10051312.xSearch in Google Scholar

Irish K. E. & Norse E. A. 1996. Scant evidence on marine biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 10: 680.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020680.xSearch in Google Scholar

Jensen M. N. & Krausman P. R. 1993. Conservation Biology's literature: New wine or just a new bottle? Wildl. Soc. Bull. 21: 199-203.Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman L. 1988. Marine biodiversity research: The sleeping dragon. Conserv. Biol. 2: 307-308.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00192.xSearch in Google Scholar

Miller L. N. & Levin S. A. 1994. Report of the Editors-in-Chief, Ecology, Ecological Monographs, and Ecological Applications. Ecol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 75: 233-236.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy D. G. 1989. Conservation and confusion: Wrong species, wrong scale, wrong conclusions. Conserv. Biol. 3: 203-204.Search in Google Scholar

Noss R. F. 1989. Who will speak for biodiversity? Conserv. Biol. 3: 202-203.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00074.xSearch in Google Scholar

Peters R. H. 1997. The ecology of science policy. Lake, Reserv. Manag. 12: 407-419.Search in Google Scholar

Peters R. H., Ball G., Carignan R. & Prepas E. 1996. An assessment of research in evolution and ecology supported by the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 670-680.10.1139/f95-226Search in Google Scholar

Redford K. H., Taber A. & Simonetti J. 1990. There is more to biodiversity than the tropical rain forests. Conserv. Biol. 3: 328-340.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00296.xSearch in Google Scholar

Resh V. H. & Yamamoto D. 1994. International collaboration in freshwater ecology. Freshw. Biol. 32: 613-624.10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01152.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sen P. K. 1968. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 63: 1379-1389.10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934Search in Google Scholar

Soule M. 1985. What is conservation biology? BioScience 35: 727-734.10.2307/1310054Search in Google Scholar

Statzner B., Resh V. & Kobzina N. 1995. Scale effects on impact factors of scientific journals: Ecology compared to other fields. Oikos 72: 440-443.10.2307/3546130Search in Google Scholar

Teer J. G. 1988. Conservation Biology. The science of scarcity. Book review. J. Wildl. Manag. 52: 570-572.10.2307/3801616Search in Google Scholar

Terbough J. 1988. The big things that run the world - a sequel to E. O. Wilson. Conserv. Biol. 2: 402-403.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00207.xSearch in Google Scholar

Thomas J. W. & Salwasser H. 1989. Bringing conservation biology into a position in natural resources management. Conserv. Biol. 3: 123-127.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00064.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wardle D. A. 1995. Journal citation impact factors and parochial citation practices. Ecol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 76: 102-104.10.2307/20167920Search in Google Scholar

Wilson E. O. 1987. The little things that rule the world (the importance and conservation of invertebrates). Conserv. Biol. 1: 344-34610.1111/j.1523-1739.1987.tb00055.xSearch in Google Scholar

Yahner R. H. 1990. Wildlife management and conservation biology revisited. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 18: 348-350.Search in Google Scholar