Impact of forest management on genetic diversity of Quercus petraea populations: a case study from the Křivoklátsko Protected Landscape Area (Czech Republic)

Bakker E. G. 2001. Towards molecular tools for management of oak forests. Genetic studies on indigenous Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. populations. 117 pp. Alterra Green World Research, Wageningen.Search in Google Scholar

Bradshaw R. H. W. 2004. Past anthropogenic influence on European forests and some possible genetic consequences. For. Ecol. Manage. 197: 203-212.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.025Search in Google Scholar

Bruschi P., Vendramin G. G., Bussotti F. & Grossoni P. 2003. Morphological and molecular diversity among italian populations of Quercus petraea (Fagaceae). Ann. Bot. 91: 707-716.10.1093/aob/mcg075Search in Google Scholar

Cottrell J. E., Munro R. C., Tabbener H. E., Milner A. D., Forrest G. I. & Lowe A. J. 2003. Comparison of fine-scale genetic structure using nuclear microsatellites within two British oakwoods differing in population history. For. Ecol. Manage. 176: 287-303.10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00289-XSearch in Google Scholar

Dow B. D., Ashley M. V. & Howe H. F. 1995. Characterization of highly variable (GA/CT)n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa.Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 137-141.Search in Google Scholar

Finkeldey R. 2000. Genetic Variation of Oaks (Quercus spp.) in Switzerland. 2. Genetic Structures in "Pure" and "Mixed" Forests of Pedunculate Oak (Q. robur L.) and Sessile Oak (Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.). Silvae Genet. 50: 22-30.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen J. S. 1993. Variation of growth in Danish provenance trials with oak (Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl.). Ann. Sci. For. 50 (Suppl. 1): 203-207.10.1051/forest:19930718Search in Google Scholar

Kampfer S., Lexer C., Glössl J. & Steinkellner H. 1998. Characterization of (GA)_n microsatellite loci from Quercus robur.Hereditas 129: 183-186.10.1111/j.1601-5223.1998.00183.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lexer C., Heinze B., Gerber S., Steinkellner H., Ziegenhagen B., Kremer A. & Glössl H. 1999. Microsatellite analysis of anonymous seedlot samples from oak: a promising approach to monitor the number of different seed parents and pollen donors. In: E. M. Gillet (ed.). Which DNA marker for which purpose? Final compendium of the research project development, optimisation and validation of molecular tools for assessment of biodiversity in forest trees in the European Union DGXII Biotechnology FW IV Research Programme Molecular Tools for Biodiversity. http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/y/1999/whichmarker/index.htm http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/y/1999/whichmarker/index.htmSearch in Google Scholar

Muir G., Lowe A. J., Fleming C. C. & Vogl J. 2004. High nuclear genetic diversity, high levels of outcrossing and low differentiation among remnant populations of Quercus petraea at the margin of its range in Ireland. Ann. Bot. 93: 691-697.Search in Google Scholar

Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small numberof individuals. Genetics 101: 139-155.Search in Google Scholar

Petit R. J., Kremer A. & Wagner D. B. 1993. Geographic structure of chloroplast DNA polymorphism in European oaks. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 122-128.10.1007/BF0022375524190203Search in Google Scholar

Siegismund H. R. & Jensen J. S. 2001. Intrapopulation and interpopulation genetic variation of Quercus in Denmark. Scand. J. For. Res. 16: 103-116.10.1080/028275801300088143Search in Google Scholar

Steinkellner H., Fluch S., Turetschek E., Lexer C., Streiff R., Kremer A., Burg K. & Glössl J. 1997. Identification and characterization of (GA/CT)_n - microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea.Pl. Molecul. Biol. 33: 1093-1096.10.1023/A:1005736722794Search in Google Scholar

Streiff R. 1999: Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Molecul. Ecol. 8: 831-841.10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00637.xSearch in Google Scholar

Streiff R. Labbe T., Bacilieri R., Steinkellner H., Gloessl J. & Kremer A. 1998. Within-population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Molecul. Ecol. 7: 317-328.10.1046/j.1365-294X.1998.00360.xSearch in Google Scholar

Streiff R., Ducousso A., Lexer C., Steinkellner H., Gloessl J. & Kremer A. 1999. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Molecul. Ecol. 8: 831-841.10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00637.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ter Braak C. J. F. Šmilauer P. 1998. CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to canoco for windows. software for canonical community ordination (Version 4). 350 pp. Centre of Biometry, Wageningen.Search in Google Scholar

Wang X.-R. & Szmidt A. E. 2001. Molecular markers in population genetics of forest trees. Scand. J. For. Res. 16: 199-220.10.1080/02827580118146Search in Google Scholar

Woessner R. A. 1975. Interprovenance crosses of loblolly pine. In: D. J. Fowler & C. W. Yeatman (eds.). Proc. 14th Meeting of the Canadian Tree Improvement Association, p. 17-23. Fredricton, New Brunswick.Search in Google Scholar

Yeh F. C., Yang R. C. & Boyle T. 1999. POPGENE version 1.31. A quick user guide. Univ. Alberta, Alberta.Search in Google Scholar

Zanetto A. & Kremer A. 1995. Geographical structure of gene diversity in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. I. Monolocus patterns of variation. Heredity 75: 506-517.10.1038/hdy.1995.167Search in Google Scholar