Using MLU to study early language development in English

Bates, E. (1999). Letter to the Info-Childes. Child Language Bulletin, 19 (1).Search in Google Scholar

Blake, J., Quartaro, G., & Onorati, S. (1993). Evaluating quantitative measures of grammatical complexity in spontaneous speech samples. Journal of Child Language 20, 139-15210.1017/S0305000900009168Search in Google Scholar

Bol, G. W. (1996). Optional subjects in Dutch child language. In Ch. Koster & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Groningen Assembly on Language Acquisition (pp. 125-133). Groningen: Centre for Language and Cognition.Search in Google Scholar

Bol, G. W. (2003). MLU-Matching and the Production of Morphosyntax in Dutch Children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). In Y. Levy & J. Schaeffer (Eds.), Language Competence Across Populations: Toward a Definition of Specific Language Impairment (pp. 259-272). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469Search in Google Scholar

DeThorne, L. S., Johnson, B. W., & Loeb, J. W. (2005). A closer look at MLU: What does it really measure? Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19 (8), 635-648.10.1080/02699200410001716165Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, S. L., Fersko, T. M., & Lundgren, C. (2001). The Use of MLU for identifying language impairment for preschool children: A review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 323-342.10.1044/1058-0360(2001/028)Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, J. R. (2001). An alternate MLU calculation: Magnitude and variability of effects. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 156-164.10.1044/1092-4388(2001/014)Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, J. R. & Kamhi, A. 1984. Syntactic and semantic aspects of the utterances of language impaired children: The same can be less. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30, 65-85.Search in Google Scholar

Klee, Th. (1992). Measuring Children's Conversational Language. In S. F. Warren & J. Reichle (Eds), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 315-330). Baltimore: Brookes.Search in Google Scholar

Leonard, L. B. & Finnerman, D. (2003). Grammatical morpheme effects on MLU: "The same can be less" revisited. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 878-888.10.1044/1092-4388(2003/068)Search in Google Scholar

Miller, J. (1991). Quantifying Productive Language Disorders. In J. Miller (Ed.) Research on Child Language Disorders: A Decade of Progress (pp. 211-220). Austin, TX: Pro Ed.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, J. F. & Chapman, R. S. (1981). The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24, 154-161.10.1044/jshr.2402.154Search in Google Scholar

Moore, D. S. & McCabe, G. P. (2003). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. New York: Freeman.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, M. D. & Brorson, K. (2005). A comparative study between mean length of utterance in morphemes (MLUm) and mean length of utterance in words (MLUw). First Language, 25 (3), 365-376.10.1177/0142723705059114Search in Google Scholar

Paul, R. (2000). Language Disorders from infancy through adolescents (2^nd ed.). Saint Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, A. (1999). From Info-Childes. IASCL, Child Language Bulletin, 19 (1).Search in Google Scholar

Plante, E., Swisher, L., Kiernan, B., & Restrepo, M. A. (1993). Language Matches: Illuminating or Confounding? Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 772-776.10.1044/jshr.3604.772Search in Google Scholar

Retherford, K. S. (1993/2000). Guide to analysis of language transcripts (2^nd ed.). Eau Claire, Wl: Thinking Publications.Search in Google Scholar

SPS Inc. (2001). SPS (Version 11.0). [Computer software]Search in Google Scholar