Wing-Tagging Temporarily Affects Time Budgets of Large Gulls

Altmann J. 1974. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods.Behaviour 49: 227-267.10.1163/156853974X00534Search in Google Scholar

Brua R. B. 1998. Negative effects of patagial tags on Ruddy ducks. J. Field Ornithol. 69: 530-535.10.1007/s0010400504509653557Search in Google Scholar

Bub H. 1974. Vogelfang und Vogelberingung. vol. 3. Ziemsen, Lutherstadt Wittenberg.Search in Google Scholar

Calvo B., Furness R. W. 1992. A review of the use and the effects of marks and devices on birds.Ring. & Migr. 13: 129-151.10.1080/03078698.1992.9674036Search in Google Scholar

Gauthier-Clerc M., Gendner J.-P., Ribic C. A., Fraser W. R., Woehler E. J., Descamps S., Gilly C., Le Bohec C., Le Maho Y. 2004. Long-term effects of flipper bands on penguins.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, Suppl. 271: 423-426.Search in Google Scholar

Green A. J., Fuentes C., Vázquez M., Viedma C., Ramón N. 2004. Use of wing tags and other methods to mark Marbled Teal (Marmaronetta angustirostris) in Spain. Ardeola 51: 191-202.Search in Google Scholar

Hart A. D. M. 1987. Patagial tags for herring gulls: improved durability.Ring. & Migr. 3: 41-49.Search in Google Scholar

Howe M. 1980. Problems with wing tags: evidence of harm to Willets. J. Field Ornithol. 51: 72-73.Search in Google Scholar

Kinkel L. K. 1989. Lasting effects of wing tags on ring-billed gulls.Auk 106: 619-624.Search in Google Scholar

Maddock M. N., Geering D. J. 1994. Effect of patagial tags on Cattle Egrets.Corella 18: 1-7.Search in Google Scholar

Saunders D. A. 1988. Patagial tags - do benefits outweigh risks to the animal?Aust. Wildl. Res. 15: 565-569.10.1071/WR9880565Search in Google Scholar

Southern L. K., Southern W. E. 1983. Responses of Ring-billed Gulls to cannon-netting and wing-tagging.J. Wildl. Manage. 47: 234-237.10.2307/3808075Search in Google Scholar

Southern L. K., Southern W. E. 1985. Some effects of wing tags on breeding Ring-billed Gulls.Auk 102: 38-42.10.2307/4086820Search in Google Scholar