[Vojtíšek, L., Frollo, I., Valkovič, L., Gogola, D., Juráš, V. (2011). Phased array receiving coils for low field lungs MRI: Design and optimization. Measurement Science Review, 9, 61-67.10.2478/v10048-011-0012-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Song Huettel, A. W., McCarthy, G. (2009). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Donoho, D. L., Johnstone, I. M. (1994). Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika, 81, 291-294.10.1093/biomet/81.3.425]Search in Google Scholar
[Donoho, D. L. (1995). Denoising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, 41, 613-627.10.1109/18.382009]Search in Google Scholar
[Mihcak, M. K., Kozintsev, I., Ramchandran, K., Moulin, P. (1999). Low complexity image denoising based on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients. IEEE Signal Proc. Letters, 6, 300-303.10.1109/97.803428]Search in Google Scholar
[Crouse, M. S., Nowak, R. D., Baraniuk, R. G. (1999). Analysis of multiresolution image denoising schemes using a generalized Gaussian and complexity priors. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, 45, 909-919.10.1109/18.761332]Search in Google Scholar
[Malfait, M., Roose, D. (1997). Wavelet-based image denoising using a markov random field a priori model. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 6, 549-565.10.1109/83.56332018282948]Search in Google Scholar
[Crouse, M. S., Nowak, R. D., Baraniuk, R. G. (1998). Wavelet-based statistical signal processing using hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 46, 886-902.10.1109/78.668544]Search in Google Scholar
[Rabbani, H., Vafadust, M., Gazor, S. (2006). Image denoising based on a mixture of Laplace distributions with local parameters in complex wavelet domain. In IEEE Int. Conference on Image Processing, October 8-11, 2006. Atlanta, GA, 2597-2600.10.1109/ICIP.2006.313018]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowak, R. D. (1999). Wavelet-based rician noise removal for magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 8, 1408-1419.10.1109/83.79196618267412]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang, S. G., Yu, B., Vetterli, M. (2000). Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 9, 1532-1546.10.1109/83.86263318262991]Search in Google Scholar
[Richardson, W. H. (1972). Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration. JOSA, 62 (1), 55-59.10.1364/JOSA.62.000055]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucy, L. B. (1974). An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions. Astronomical Journal, 79 (6), 745-754.10.1086/111605]Search in Google Scholar
[Fish, D. A., Brinicombe, A. M., Pike, E. R. (1995). Blind deconvolution by means of the Richardson-Lucy algorithm. J. of the Optical Society of America A, 12 (1), 58-65.10.1364/JOSAA.12.000058]Search in Google Scholar
[Stockham, T. G., Cannon, T. M., Ingebretsen, R. B. (1975). Blind deconvolution through digital signal processing. In Proc. IEEE, 63 (4), 678-692.10.1109/PROC.1975.9800]Search in Google Scholar
[Cannon, M. (1976). Blind deconvolution of spatially invariant image blurs with phase. IEEE Trans. on Acoustic, Speech, and Signal Processing, 24 (1), 58-63.10.1109/TASSP.1976.1162770]Search in Google Scholar
[Rabbani, H. (2008). Statistical modeling of low SNR magnetic resonance images in wavelet domain using Laplacian prior and two-sided Rayleigh noise for visual quality improvement. In International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine (ITAB 2008), May 30-31, 2008. IEEE, 116-119.10.1109/ITAB.2008.4570560]Search in Google Scholar
[Rabbani, H., Vafadust, M. (2008). Image/video denoising based on a mixture of Laplace distributions with local parameters in multidimensional complex wavelet domain. Signal Processing, 88 (1), 158-173.10.1016/j.sigpro.2007.07.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Rabbani, H., Nezafat, R., Gazor, S. (2009). Waveletdomain medical image denoising using bivariate Laplacian mixture model. IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Engineering, 56 (12), 2826-2837.10.1109/TBME.2009.202887619695984]Search in Google Scholar
[Selesnick, I. W., Kingsbury, N., Baraniuk, R. G. (2005). The dual-tree complex wavelet transforms - a coherent framework for multiscale signal and image processing. IEEE Signal Proc. Magazine, 9, 123-151.10.1109/MSP.2005.1550194]Search in Google Scholar
[Kingsbury, N. G. (2000). A dual-tree complex wavelet transform with improved orthogonality and symmetry properties. In 2000 Int. Conference on Image Processing, Vol. 2, September 10-13, 2000. IEEE, 375-378.10.1109/ICIP.2000.899397]Search in Google Scholar
[Geman, S., Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6 (6), 721-741.10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596]Search in Google Scholar
[Derin, H., Elliott, H. (1987). Modeling and segmentation of noisy and textured images using Gibbs random fields. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 9, 39-55.10.1109/TPAMI.1987.4767871]Search in Google Scholar
[Molina, R., Katsaggelos, A. K., Abad, J., Mateos, J. (1997). A Bayesian approach to blind deconvolution based on dirichlet distributions. In IEEE Int. Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP-97), Vol. 4, April 21-24, 1997. IEEE, 2809-2812.10.1109/ICASSP.1997.595373]Search in Google Scholar
[Sroubek, F., Flusser, J. (2005). Multichannel blind deconvolution of spatially misaligned images. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 14 (7), 874-883.10.1109/TIP.2005.849322]Search in Google Scholar
[Babacan, S., Molina, R., Katsaggelos, A. (2008). Parameter estimation in TV image restoration using variational distribution approximation. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 17 (23), 326-339.10.1109/TIP.2007.916051]Search in Google Scholar
[Levin, A., Weiss, Y., Durand, F., Freeman, W. T. (2009). Understanding and evaluating blind deconvolution algorithms. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2009), June 20-25, 2009. IEEE, 1964-1971.10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206815]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenspan, H., Oz, G., Kiryati, N., Peled, S. (2002). MRI inter-slice reconstruction using super resolution. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 20 (5), 437-446.10.1016/S0730-725X(02)00511-8]Search in Google Scholar