An ecodesign method for reducing the effects of hazardous substances in the product lifecycle

1. Human health risk assessment toolkit: chemical hazards (2010). IPCS project on the Harmonization of Approaches to the Assessment of Risk from Exposure to Chemicals, WHO, p. 88.Search in Google Scholar

2. Binetti, R. et al. (2008). Exponential growth of new chemicals and evolution of information relevant to risk control. Ann. Ist. Super Sanita, 44 (1), 13-15.Search in Google Scholar

3. Allanou, R. et al. (2003). Public availability of data on EU high production volume chemicals - Part 2. CHIMICA OGGI (Chemistry today), July-August, 59-64.Search in Google Scholar

4. Irigaray, P. et al. (2007). Lifestyle-related factors and environmental agents causing cancer: an overview. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 61(10), 640-658.1805516010.1016/j.biopha.2007.10.00618055160Search in Google Scholar

5. Hwang, H.M. et al. (2008). Occurrence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in indoor dust. Science of the Total Environment, 404 (1), 26-35.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.031285805718632138Search in Google Scholar

6. Fridén, U.E. et al. (2011). Chlorinated paraffins in indoor air and dust: Concentrations, congener patterns, and human exposure. Environment International, 6.10.1016/j.envint.2011.04.00221612825Search in Google Scholar

7. ISO 14040 (2006). Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles andframework. Geneva (Switzerland): International Organisation for Standardisation.Search in Google Scholar

8. Technical Guidance Document in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment. Part I, EC, Joint Research Centre, EUR 20418 EN/2, Printed in Italy, 2003, p. 311.Search in Google Scholar

9. Karlsson, R., & Luttropp, C. (2006). EcoDesign: what's happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue. J. of Cleaner Production, 14 (15- 16), 1291-1298.10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.010Search in Google Scholar

10. Adu, I.K., et al. (2008). Comparison of methods for assessing environmental, health and safety (EHS) hazards in early phases of chemical process design. Process Safety and Env.Protection, 86 (2), 77-93.10.1016/j.psep.2007.10.005Search in Google Scholar

11. Knight, P., & Jenkins, J.O. (2009). Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners perspective. J. of Cleaner Production, 17 (5), 549-558.10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.002Search in Google Scholar

12. ECMA 341, Environmental Design Considerations for ICT & CE Products, European association for standardizing information and communication systems, [online] [accessed 14.03.2010]. Accessible: http://www.ecmainternational. org/publications/standards/Standard.htmSearch in Google Scholar

13. The Oeko-Tex Standards, [online] [accessed 10.02.2012]. Accessible: http://www.oeko-tex.comSearch in Google Scholar

14. BASTA, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute & the Swedish Construction Federation, [online] [accessed 14.09.2011]. Accessible: http://www.bastaonline.seSearch in Google Scholar

15. Nissen, N.F. (2001). Entwicklung eines ökologischen Bewertungsmodells zur Beurteilungelektronischer Systeme, Doctoral Dissertation, Technical University of Berlin, Department of Electrical Engineering, p. 202Search in Google Scholar

16. Wenzel, H. et al. (1997). Environmental Assessment of Products. Vol 1: Methodology, Tools and Case Studies in Product Development, 564.10.1007/978-1-4615-6367-9Search in Google Scholar

17. Lithner, D. et al. (2011). Environmental and health hazard ranking and assessment of plastic polymers based on chemical composition. Sci. of the Total Environment, 409 (10), 3309-3324.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.03821663944Search in Google Scholar

18. Ahrens, A. et al. (2003). Guidance for the use of environmentally sound substances. Part 1. Fivesteps for the evaluation of environmental risks. Federal Environmental Agency, Germany, p. 66.Search in Google Scholar

19. ECOIT, [online] [accessed 14.04.2011]. Accessible: PRé Consultants, http://www.pre.nl/content/about-preSearch in Google Scholar

20. Idemat, Delft Technical University, [online] [accessed 14.04.2011]. Accessible: http://www.idemat.nl/Search in Google Scholar

21. Huang H., et al. (2009). Materials selection for environmentally conscious design via a proposed life cycle environmental performance index. Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 44 (11-12), 1073-1082.10.1007/s00170-009-1935-9Search in Google Scholar

22. Rosenbaum, R.K. et al. (2008). USEtox-the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. of Life Cycle Assessment, 13 (7), 532-546.10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4Search in Google Scholar

23. Meijer, A. et al. (2005). Human Health Damages due to Indoor Sources of Organic Compounds and Radioactivity in Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Dwellings. Part 1: Characterisation Factors. Int. J. of Life Cycle Assessment, 10 (5), 309-316.Search in Google Scholar

24. Braungart, M. et al. (2007). Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions - a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. J. of Cleaner Production, 15 (13-14), 1337-1348.10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003Search in Google Scholar

25. Niederl-Schmidinger, A., & Narodoslawsky, M. (2008). Life cycle assessment as an engineer’s tool? J. of Cleaner Production, 16, 245-252.10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.024Search in Google Scholar

26. Cho, K.T. (2003). Multicriteria decision methods: an attempt to evaluate and unify. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37, 1099-1119.10.1016/S0895-7177(03)00122-5Search in Google Scholar

27. Johansson, J., & Luttropp, C. (2009). Material hygiene: improving recycling of WEEE demonstrated on dishwashers. J. of Cleaner Production, 17 (1), 26-35.10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.010Search in Google Scholar

28. Globally Harmonized System of classification and labelling of chemicals. (2000). United Nations, New York and Geneva, p.431.Search in Google Scholar

29. REACH, Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (2006. 18. XII), concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals OJ L 396 30.12.2006 1-850.Search in Google Scholar

30. Guinee, J.B. (ed). (2002). Life cycle assessment − an operational guide to the ISOstandards. Centre of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Kluwer Academic Publishers p. 692.Search in Google Scholar

31. Iakovoua, E. et al. (2009). A methodological framework for end-of-life management of electronic products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53 (6), 329-339.10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.02.001Search in Google Scholar

32. Cerdan, C. et al. (2009). Proposal for new quantitative eco-design indicators: a first case study. J. of Cleaner Production, 17 (18), 1638-1643.10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.010Search in Google Scholar

33. Mathieux, F. et al. (2008). ReSICLED: a new recovery-conscious design method for complex products based on a multicriteria assessment of the recoverability. J. of Cleaner Production, 16 (3), 277-298.10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.026Search in Google Scholar

34. Otto, K.N., & Wood, K.L. (2001). Product Design, Techniques in Reverse Engineering andNew Product Development. Prentice Hall 1061Search in Google Scholar

35. Harmonized classification and labelling of certain hazardous substances, Annex VI, table 3.2 of regulation REACH, EC No 1272/2008 (online) (accessed 15.04.2011). Accessible: http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/esis/index.php?PGM=claSearch in Google Scholar

36. IARC Monographs on the evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, The International Agency for Research on Cancer, [online] [accessed 11.07.2011]. Accessible: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/PDFs/index.phpSearch in Google Scholar

37. Michna J. et al. (2011). Management of energy and environment conservation: current methodical problems. Latv. J. Phys. Tec. Sci., 49 (1), 28-41.10.2478/v10047-011-0003-zSearch in Google Scholar

38. Bovea, M.D., & Pérez-Belis, V. (2012). A taxonomy of eco-design tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. J. of Cleaner Production, 20(1), 61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.01210.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

39. European Classification and Labelling Inspections of Preparations, including Safety Data Sheets, Final report, 64 p. [online] [accessed 03.07.2011]. Accessible: http://hesa.etui-rehs.orgSearch in Google Scholar

40. Hinks J., et al. (2009). Views on chemical safety information and influences on chemical disposal behaviour in the UK. Sci. of the Total Environment, 407, 1299-1306.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.05619036406Search in Google Scholar