Chromatin Quality as a Crucial Factor for the Success of Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization Analyses of Unfertilized Oocytes, Polar Bodies and Arrested Zygotes

Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2(4): 280-291.10.1038/35066065Search in Google Scholar

Schmiady H, Sperling K, Kentenich H, Stauber M. Prematurely condensed human sperm chromosomes after in vitro fertilization (IVF). Hum Genet 1986; 74(4): 441-443.10.1007/BF00280502Search in Google Scholar

Plachot M, Crozet N. Fertilization abnormalities in human in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1992; 7(Suppl 1): 89-94.10.1093/humrep/7.suppl_1.89Search in Google Scholar

van der Ven HH, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K, Hamerich U, Lehmann F, Krebs D. Polyspermy in in vitro fertilization of human oocytes: frequency and possible causes. Ann NY Acad Sci 1985; 442: 88-95.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb37508.xSearch in Google Scholar

Rosenbusch BE. Mechanisms giving rise to triploid zygotes during assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 2008; 90(1): 49-55.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.031Search in Google Scholar

Noyes N, Fino ME, Krey L, McCaffrey C, Adler A, Grifo J. Embryo biopsy: the fate of abnormal pronuclear embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17(6): 782-788.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60405-1Search in Google Scholar

Schmiady H, Kentenich H. Cytological studies of human zygotes exhibiting developmental arrest. Hum Reprod 1993; 8(5): 744-751.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138133Search in Google Scholar

Lechniak D, Pers-Kamczyc E, Pawlak P. Timing of the first zygotic cleavage as a marker of developmental potential of mammalian embryos. Reprod Biol 2008; 8(1): 23-42.10.1016/S1642-431X(12)60002-3Search in Google Scholar

Rosenbusch B, Glaeser B, Brucker C, Schneider M. Endoreduplication of the hyperhaploid maternal complement and abnormal pronuclear formation in a human zygote obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Ann Genet 2002; 45(3): 157-159.10.1016/S0003-3995(02)01126-7Search in Google Scholar

Rosenbusch B, Schneider M, Gläser B, Brucker C. Cytogenetic analysis of giant oocytes and zygotes to assess their relevance for the development of digynic triploidy. Hum Reprod 2002; 17(9): 2388-2393.10.1093/humrep/17.9.238812202429Search in Google Scholar

Benkhalifa M, Kahraman S, Caserta D, Domez E, Qumsiyeh MB. Morphological and cytogenetic analysis of intact oocytes and blocked zygotes. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23(5): 397-404.10.1002/pd.60612749038Search in Google Scholar

Pujol A, Boiso I, Benet J, Veiga A, Durban M, Campillo M, Egozcue J, Navarro J. Analysis of nine chromosome probes in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes for the detection of aneuploidies. Eur J Hum Genet 2003; 11(4): 325-336.10.1038/sj.ejhg.520096512700606Search in Google Scholar

Otsu E, Sato A, Nagaki M, Araki Y, Utsunomiya T. Developmental potential and chromosomal constitution of embryos derived from larger single pronuclei of human zygotes used in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2004; 81(3): 723-724.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.04215037434Search in Google Scholar

Reichman DE, Jackson KV, Racowsky C. Incidence and development of zygotes exhibiting abnormal pronuclear disposition after identification of two pronuclei at the fertilization check. Fertil Steril 2009; May 22 [Epub ahead of print].10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.01819476942Search in Google Scholar

Tarkowski AK. An air-drying method for chromosome preparations from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 1966; 5: 394-400.10.1159/000129914Search in Google Scholar

Kamiguchi Y, Funaki K, Mikamo E. A new technique for chromosome study of murine oocytes. Proc Jpn Acad 1976; 52: 316-319.10.2183/pjab1945.52.316Search in Google Scholar

Delimitreva S, Markova M, Zhivkova R. Optimal metaphase plate preparation in mouse oocytes requires specific conditions for spindle disintegration. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie Bulgare des Sciences 1999; 52(7-8): 105-108.Search in Google Scholar

Martini E, Flaherty SP, Swann NJ, Payne D, Matthews CD. Analysis of unfertilized oocytes subjected to intracytoplasmic sperm injection using two rounds of fluorescence in-situ hybridization and probes to five chromosomes. Hum Reprod 1997; 12(9): 2011-2018.10.1093/humrep/12.9.20119363722Search in Google Scholar

Pellestor F. The cytogenetic analysis of human zygotes and preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1(6): 581-585.10.1093/humupd/1.6.5819079398Search in Google Scholar

Pellestor F, Girardet A, Andréo B, Arnal F, Humeau C. Relationship between morphology and chromosomal constitution in human preimplantation embryo. Mol Reprod Dev 1995; 39(2): 141-146.10.1002/mrd.10803902047826614Search in Google Scholar

Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, Delhanty JD. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res 1999; 27(4): 1214-1218.10.1093/nar/27.4.12141483059927758Search in Google Scholar

Paulasova P, Andréo B, Diblik J, Macek M, Pellestor F. The peptide nucleic acids as probes for chromosomal analysis: application to human oocytes, polar bodies and preimplantation embryos. Mol Hum Reprod 2004; 10(6): 467-472.10.1093/molehr/gah061Search in Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Benet J, Wells D, Colls P, Bermúdez MG, Sánchez-García JF, Egozcue J, Navarro J, Munné S. Aneuploidy study of human oocytes first polar body comparative genomic hybridization and metaphase II fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Hum Reprod 2004; 19(12): 2859-2868.10.1093/humrep/deh515Search in Google Scholar

Fragouli E, Wells D, Thornhill A, Serhal P, Faed MJ, Harper JC, Delhanty JD. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies. Hum Reprod 2006; 21(9): 2319-2328.10.1093/humrep/del157Search in Google Scholar

Daphnis DD, Fragouli E, Economou K, Jerkovic S, Craft IL, Delhanty JD, Harper JC. Analysis of the evolution of chromosome abnormalities in human embryos from Day 3 to 5 using CGH and FISH. Mol Hum Reprod 2008; 14(2): 117-125.10.1093/molehr/gam087Search in Google Scholar

Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Meiotic and mitotic nondisjunction: lessons from preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10(5): 401-407.10.1093/humupd/dmh036Search in Google Scholar

Harper JC, Pergament E, Delhanty JD. Genetics of gametes and embryos. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115(Suppl 1): S80-S84.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.018Search in Google Scholar

Sermon K, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Lancet 2004; 363(9421): 1633-1641.10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16209-0Search in Google Scholar

Baart EB, Martini E, Van Opstal D. Screening for aneuploidies of ten different chromosomes in two rounds of FISH: a short and reliable protocol. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24(12): 955-91.10.1002/pd.105215614916Search in Google Scholar

Colls P, Goodall N, Zheng X, Munné S. Increased efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy by testing 12 chromosomes. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 19(4): 532-538.10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.05.00219909595Search in Google Scholar

Zhivkova RS, Delimitreva SM, Toncheva DI, Vatev IT. Analysis of human unfertilized oocytes and pronuclear zygotes-correlation between chromosome/ chromatin status and patient-related factors. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 130(1): 73-83.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.03.02216650520Search in Google Scholar

Uher P, Baborova P, Kralickova M, Zech MH, Verlinsky Y, Zech NH. Non-informative results and monosomies in PGD: the importance of a third round of re-hybridization. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 19(4): 539-546.10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.05.00819909596Search in Google Scholar

Vatev I. Human in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program at the Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1988; 5(1): 48-49.10.1007/BF011388713367074Search in Google Scholar

Vatev I., Karagyozov I, Istatkov M, Srebreva M. Successsful application of the fallopian sperm perfusion method and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) technique for the treatment of human infertility. Balkan J Med Genet 1998; 3(1): 115-119.Search in Google Scholar

Delimitreva SM, Zhivkova RS, Vatev IT, Toncheva DI. Chromosomal disorders and nuclear and cell destruction in cleaving human embryos. Int J Dev Biol 2005; 49(4): 409-416.10.1387/ijdb.041909sd15968586Search in Google Scholar

Martin RH, Mahadevan MM, Taylor PJ, Hildebrand K, Long-Simpson L, Peterson D, Yamamoto J, Fleetham J. Chromosomal analysis of unfertilized human oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 1986; 78(2): 673-678.10.1530/jrf.0.07806733806521Search in Google Scholar

Pellestor F, Anahory T, Hamamah S. The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11(1): 15-32.10.1093/humupd/dmh05115569701Search in Google Scholar

Oliver-Bonet M, Benet J, Martin RH. Studying meiosis: a review of FISH and M-FISH techniques used in the analysis of meiotic processes in humans. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 114(3-4): 312-318.10.1159/00009421916954672Search in Google Scholar

Perez GI, Acton BM, Jurisicova A, Perkins GA, White A, Brown J, Trbovich AM, Kim MR, Fissore R, Xu J, Ahmady A, D'Estaing SG, Li H, Kagawa W, Kurumizaka H, Yokoyama S, Okada H, Mak TW, Ellisman MH, Casper RF, Tilly JL. Genetic variance modifies apoptosis susceptibility in mature oocytes via alterations in DNA repair capacity and mitochondrial ultrastructure. Cell Death Differ 2007; 14(3): 524-533.10.1038/sj.cdd.440205017039249Search in Google Scholar

Morita Y, Tilly JL. Oocyte apoptosis: like sand through an hourglass. Dev Biol 1999; 213(1): 1-17.10.1006/dbio.1999.934410452843Search in Google Scholar

Delimitreva SM. The status of the chromatin of human preimplantation embryos with good morphology. Folia Biol (Praha) 2002; 48(4): 149-153.Search in Google Scholar

Gjørret JO, Knijn HM, Dieleman SJ, Avery B, Larsson LI, Maddox-Hyttel P. Chronology of apoptosis in bovine embryos produced in vivo and in vitro. Biol Reprod 2003; 69(4): 1193-1200.10.1095/biolreprod.102.01324312773422Search in Google Scholar