Commonwealth of Independent States Economic Development: Multidimensional Comparison of States

Alkire, S. & Sarwar, M. (2009). Multidimensional Measures of Poverty and Well-Being. ReportWorking Paper for the European Commission, www.ophi.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/OPHI-RP-6a.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Brauers, W.K., Ginevicius, M.R., Zavadskas, E.K. & Antucheviciene, J. (2007). The European Union in a Transition Economy. Transformations in Business and Economics, 6 (2), 21-37.Search in Google Scholar

Boeri, T. & Terrel, K. (2002). Institutional Determinants of Labor Reallocation in Transition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16, No. 1, 51-76.Search in Google Scholar

Cieślak, M. (1974). Taksonomiczna procedura prognozowania rozwoju gospodarczego i określenia potrzeb na kadry kwalifikowane. Przegląd Statystyczny 21.01.1974.Search in Google Scholar

Cornia, G.A. (2010). Transition, Structural Divergence, and Performance. United Nations UniversityUNU-WIDER World Institute for Development Economics research. Working Paper No. 2010/32.Search in Google Scholar

Foo, J. & Witkowska, D. (2008a). EMU Convergence Prospects and Transition Countries. InternationalJournal of Business, ISSN:1083-4346, 2008, Vol. 13, No. 2, 119-139.Search in Google Scholar

Foo, J. & Witkowska, D. (2008b). Transitional Progress and Business Challenges. InternationalAdvances in Economic Research, 215-227.10.1007/s11294-008-9136-0Search in Google Scholar

Foo, J. & Witkowska, D. (2009). Foreign Presence and Financial Development in EmergingCountries. In: D. Witkowska, M. Łatuszyńska (Eds.), Quantitative Methods in Regionaland Sectoral Analysis. Szczecin: University of Szczecin, Faculty of Economics and management, 13-32.Search in Google Scholar

Ginevicius, R. & Podvezko, V. (2009). Evaluating the Changes in Economic and Social Development of Lithuanian Counties by Multiple Criteria Methods. Technological and EconomicDevelopment of Economy. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2009, No. 3, 418-436.10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.418-436Search in Google Scholar

Hellwig, Z. (1968). Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę kwalifikowanych kadr, Przegląd Statystyczny, nr 4, 324.Search in Google Scholar

Kompa, K. & Witkowska, D. (2009). Comparison of the Socio-Economic Development Level of European Union States: the Distance Measures Application. Polish Journal of EnvironmentalStudies, Vol. 18, No. 3B, 391-397.Search in Google Scholar

Kompa, K. & Witkowska, D. (2010a). Application of Selected Synthetic Measures to Comparethe Socio-Economic Development in European Union State. In: K. Jajuga, M. Walesiak (Eds.), Taksonomia 17. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 71-80 (in Polish).Search in Google Scholar

Kompa, K. & Witkowska, D. (2010b). Evaluation of the Development Level of the EuropeanUnion States in Years 1990-2006. In: W. Starzyńska, W. Roszko (Eds.), MacroeconomicAspects of European Integration. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Oeconomica 241, 123-135.Search in Google Scholar

Krakowiak-Bal, A. (2005). The Implementation of Chosen Synthetic Measures for Cons-truction of Development’s Measure of Technical Infrastructure. Infrastruktura i EkologiaTerenów Wiejskich, nr 3/2005, PAN, Oddział w Krakowie, 71-82 (in Polish).Search in Google Scholar

Nijkamp, P. (1986). Infrastructure and Regional Development: A Multidimensional PolicyAnalysis, Empirical Economics. Amsterdam: Free University Press, 1-21.Search in Google Scholar

Nijkamp, P. & Vindigni, G. (2000). Multidimensional Comparative Assessment Methodology for Policy Analysis: A Multi- Country Study of the Agricultural Sector. Journal of EnvironmentalSystems, Vol. 28 71-90. Search in Google Scholar

Roland, G. (2001). Ten Years After Transition and Economics. IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 48, Special Issue.Search in Google Scholar

Rutkowski, J. (2003). Rapid Labor Reallocation with a Stagnant Unemployment Pool: The Puzzle of the Labor Market in Lithuania. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2946, www.wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2003/03/07/000094946_03012304282754/additional/103503322_20041117164006.pdf.10.1596/1813-9450-2946Search in Google Scholar

Sojka, E. (2008). Multidimensional Comparative Analysis of Demographic Groth of Voivodeships in Poland. Bulletin of Geography, Socio-Economic Series, No. 9, 5-19.10.2478/v10089-008-0001-ySearch in Google Scholar

Svejnar, J. (2002). Transition Economies: Performance and Challenges. Journal of EconomicPerspectives, Vol. 16, No. 1, 3-28.Search in Google Scholar

Todaro, M.P. & Smith, S.C. (2003). Economic Development, Addison-Wesley Higher Education Group.Search in Google Scholar

Witkowska, W. & Foo, J. (2009). Application of Multidimensional Analysis to Banking Development Evaluation. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol. 18, No. 5B, 209-216.Search in Google Scholar

www.cisstat.com/eng/frame_macro.htm.Search in Google Scholar

Zeliaś, A. & Malina, A. (1997). O budowie taksonomicznej miary jakości życia. Syntetycznamiara rozwoju jest narzędziem statystycznej analizy porównawczej. In: K. Jajuga, M. Walesiak (Eds.), Taksonomia 4. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu. Search in Google Scholar