<abstract xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Although the issue of classifying <italic>Abies alba</italic> woodlands has been tackled by many authors, the greatest influence had a trend-setting work of Braun-Blanquet (Braun-Blanquet et al. 1939): he described the suballiance <italic>Abieti-Piceenion</italic> Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl et al. 1939. Another important conception was created later by Oberdorfer (1957) who later (1962) differentiated suballiances <italic>Galio-Abietenion</italic> and <italic>Vaccinio-Abietenion.</italic> The main difference concerns the syntaxonomical approach to <italic>Abies</italic> woodlands: according to Braun-Blanquet, the presence (or dominance) of <italic>Abies alba</italic> is not evaluated separately: montane coniferous forests with the relevant character species are classified into the suballiance <italic>Abieti-Piceenion</italic>, meant as opposite to the subalpine coniferous forests. By contrast, Oberdorfer treated woodlands with the high abundance/dominance of <italic>Abies alba</italic> and natural absence of <italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic> as distinct types of syntaxa and divided further the montane <italic>Abies</italic> woodlands according to their phytocoenotic differences. These two fundamental conceptions were used alternatively by various authors, and not always in accordance with the original authors' intention. Therefore it is important to draw the attention of phytosociologists to differences resulting from the syntaxonomical concept chosen.</p></abstract>

Although the issue of classifying Abies alba woodlands has been tackled by many authors, the greatest influence had a trend-setting work of Braun-Blanquet (Braun-Blanquet et al. 1939): he described the suballiance Abieti-Piceenion Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl et al. 1939. Another important conception was created later by Oberdorfer (1957) who later (1962) differentiated suballiances Galio-Abietenion and Vaccinio-Abietenion. The main difference concerns the syntaxonomical approach to Abies woodlands: according to Braun-Blanquet, the presence (or dominance) of Abies alba is not evaluated separately: montane coniferous forests with the relevant character species are classified into the suballiance Abieti-Piceenion, meant as opposite to the subalpine coniferous forests. By contrast, Oberdorfer treated woodlands with the high abundance/dominance of Abies alba and natural absence of Fagus sylvatica as distinct types of syntaxa and divided further the montane Abies woodlands according to their phytocoenotic differences. These two fundamental conceptions were used alternatively by various authors, and not always in accordance with the original authors' intention. Therefore it is important to draw the attention of phytosociologists to differences resulting from the syntaxonomical concept chosen.

Remarks on Higher-Ranked Syntaxa with <italic>Abies Alba</italic> in Central Europe: Their Concepts and Nomenclature

Botanical Garden of Comenius University, Blatnica, SK-038 15 Blatnica

Hacquetia

Remarks on Higher-Ranked Syntaxa with  in Central Europe: Their Concepts and Nomenclature

Although the issue of classifying Abies alba woodlands has been tackled by many authors, the greatest influence had a trend-setting work of Braun-Blanquet...

Remarks on Higher-Ranked Syntaxa with Abies Alba in Central Europe: Their Concepts and Nomenclature

Published Online: Dec 22, 2008

Page range: 161 - 172

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10028-008-0009-0

Keywords
gozdovi bele jelke, Abietion albae, Abieti-Piceenion, Fagetalia sylvaticae, Galio-Abietenion, Vaccinio-Abietenion

This content is open access.