Outcome of MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy - initial experience at Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia

Podobnik J, Kocijancic I, Kovac V, Sersa I. 3T MRI in evaluation of asbestosrelated thoracic diseases - preliminary results. Radiol Oncol 2010; 44: 92-6.10.2478/v10019-010-0027-7Search in Google Scholar

Stanic K, Kovac V. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small-cell lung cancer: the experience at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana. Radiol Oncol 2010; 44: 180-6.10.2478/v10019-010-0038-4Search in Google Scholar

Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007; 370: 485-92.10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61232-XSearch in Google Scholar

Lehman CD, Deperi ER, Peacock S, McDonough MD, Demartini WB, Shook J. Clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 1782-7.10.2214/ajr.184.6.0184178215908530Search in Google Scholar

Lehman CD, DeMartini W, Anderson BO, Edge SB. Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009; 7: 193-201.10.6004/jnccn.2009.001319200417Search in Google Scholar

Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, Verdecchia A, Santaquilani M, Musumeci R, et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 2007; 242: 698-715.10.1148/radiol.242305196517244718Search in Google Scholar

Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 426-30.10.2214/AJR.04.170716423948Search in Google Scholar

Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, Causer PA, Zubovits JT, Jong RA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004; 292: 1317-25.10.1001/jama.292.11.131715367553Search in Google Scholar

Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 1296-316.10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.01520304629Search in Google Scholar

Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A, Schaumlöffel U, Viehweg P, Buchmann J, Lampe D, et al. MR-guided percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 1656-65.10.1007/s00330005090510525886Search in Google Scholar

Prat X, Sittek H, Grosse A, Baath L, Perlet C, Alberich T, et al. European quadricentric evaluation of a breast MR biopsy and localization device: technical improvements based on phase I evaluation. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1720-7.10.1007/s00330-002-1317-2Search in Google Scholar

Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Fukuma E. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a non-titanium needle. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007; 6: 259-64.10.2463/mrms.6.259Search in Google Scholar

Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 2006; 106: 982-90.10.1002/cncr.2172016456807Search in Google Scholar

Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Sinnatamby R, Lebeau A, Lebrecht A, Britton PD, Schreer I. Consensus Group Interdisciplinary consensus on the uses and technique of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): results of a European consensus meeting. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72: 289-94.10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.010Search in Google Scholar

Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schaumlöffel-Schulze U, Heinig A, Beck RM, Lampe D, Buchmann J. MR-guided percutaneous vacuum biopsy of breast lesions: experiences with 100 lesions. [Abstract]. Radiology 1999; 213(P): 289.10.1016/S0959-8049(99)81656-6Search in Google Scholar

Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, Thornton C, Dershaw DD. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-Assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical Experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 183-93.10.2214/ajr.185.1.0185018315972421Search in Google Scholar

Orel SG, Rosen M, Mies C, Schnall MD. MR imaging-guided-9-gauge vasuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience. Radiology 2006; 238: 54-61.10.1148/radiol.238105005016304093Search in Google Scholar

Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 2006; 106: 982-90.10.1002/cncr.21720Search in Google Scholar

Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Sakamoto M, Sakamoto N, Mizuuchi N, Fukuma E. Magnetic resonance-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results in 100 Japanese women. Jpn J Radiol 2010; 28: 527-33.10.1007/s11604-010-0464-720799018Search in Google Scholar

Noroozian M, Gombos EC, Chikarmane S, Georgian-Smith D, Raza S, Denison CM, et al. Factors that impact the duration of MRI-guided core needle biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 150-7.10.2214/AJR.09.236620093566Search in Google Scholar

American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS MRI. ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhl CK, Shild HH, Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 2005; 236: 789-800.10.1148/radiol.236304081116118161Search in Google Scholar

Goto M, Ito H, Akazawa K, Kubota T, Kizu O, Yamada K, et al. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 104-12.10.1002/jmri.2081217152054Search in Google Scholar

Sohns C, Scherrer M, Staab W, Obenauer S. Value of the BI-RADS Classification in MR-mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors. European Radiology 2011; 21: 2475-83.10.1007/s00330-011-2210-7321713921805368Search in Google Scholar

Zebic-Sinkovec M, Kadivec M, Podobnik G, Skof E, Snoj M. Mammographycally occult high grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as second primary breast cancer, detected with MRI, a case report. Radiol Oncol 2010; 44: 228-31.10.2478/v10019-010-0033-9342370622933920Search in Google Scholar

Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA. Nonmass lesions in magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: additionhal T2-weigted images improve diagnostic accuracy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35: 361-6.10.1097/RCT.0b013e31821065c321586932Search in Google Scholar

Jansen SA, Paunesku T, Fan X, Woloschak GE, Vogt S, Conzen SD, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: x-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model. Radiology 2009; 253: 399-406.10.1148/radiol.2533082026277011219864527Search in Google Scholar

CK Kuhl: Why do purely intraductal cancers enhance on breast MR Images? Radiology 2009; 253: 281-3.10.1148/radiol.253209140119864520Search in Google Scholar

Mossa-Basha M, Fundaro GM, Shah BA, Ali S, Pantelic MV. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics 2010; 30: 1673-87.10.1148/rg.30610551021071382Search in Google Scholar

Newstead GM. MR Imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010; 18: 225-40.10.1016/j.mric.2010.02.00420494308Search in Google Scholar

Miklavcic D, Towhidi L. Numerical study of the electroporation pulse shape effect on molecular uptake of biological cells. Radiol Oncol 2010; 44: 34-41.10.2478/v10019-010-0002-3342367222933889Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Kaplan J, Morris EA. MRI follow-up after concordant, histologically benign diagnosis of breast lesions sampled by MRI-guided biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 850-5.10.2214/AJR.08.222619696301Search in Google Scholar