[Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta Radiol 1953; 39: 368-76.10.3109/00016925309136722]Search in Google Scholar
[Gjikolli B, Hadzihasanovic B, Jaganjac S, Herceglija E, Niksic M, Hadzimehmedagic A, et al. Treatment of complicated case with subclavia steal syndrome and stenosis of common iliac artery. Radiol Oncol 2008; 42: 1-12.10.2478/v10019-007-0032-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Singh H, Cardella JF, Cole PE, Grassi CJ, McCowan TC, Swan TL, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for diagnostic arteriography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13: 1-6.10.1016/S1051-0443(07)60001-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Popma JJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Campbell A, Chuang YC, et al. Vascular complications after balloon and new devices angioplasty. Circulation 1993; 88 (part 1): 1569-78.10.1161/01.CIR.88.4.1569]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffer EK, Bloch RD. Percutaneous arterial closure devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 865-85.10.1097/01.RVI.0000071086.76348.8E]Search in Google Scholar
[Madigan JB, Ratnam LA, Belli AM. Arterial closure devices. J Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 48: 607-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hirsch JA, Reddy SA, Capasso WE, Linfante I. Non-invasive haemostatic closure devices. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 6: 92-5.10.1053/tvir.2003.3644612903003]Search in Google Scholar
[Nguyen N, Hasan S, Caufield L, Ling FS, Marins CR. Radnomized control trial of topical hemostasis pad use for achieving vascular hemostasis following percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69: 801-7.10.1002/ccd.2102417262862]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang DS, Chu LF, Olson SE, Miller FJ, Valji K, Wong WH, et al. Comparative evaluation of noninvasive compression adjuncts for hemostasis in percutaneous arterial, venous and arteriovenous dialysis access procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19: 72-9.10.1016/j.jvir.2007.08.02818192470]Search in Google Scholar
[Mlekusch W, Dick P, Haumer M, Sabeti S, Minar E, Schillinger M. Arterial puncture site management after percutaneous transluminal procedures using a hemostatic wound dressing (Clo-Sur PAD) versus conventional manual compression: A randomized controlled trial. J Endovasc Ther 2006; 13: 23-31.10.1583/05-1679.116445320]Search in Google Scholar
[Hallak OK, Cubedder RJ; Griffith RA, Reyes BJ. The use of the D-STAT dry bandage for the control of vascular access site bleeding: A multicenter experience in 376 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30: 593-600.10.1007/s00270-007-9019-417468908]Search in Google Scholar
[Balzer JO, Schwarz W, Thalhammer A, Eichler K, Schmitz-Rixen T, Vogl TJ. Post interventional percutaneous closure of femoral artery access sites using the Clo-Sur PAD device: Initial findings. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 693-700.10.1007/s00330-006-0279-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Rastan A, Sixt S, Swarzwalder U, Schwarz T, Frank U, Burgelin K, et al. VIPER-2: A prospective, randomized single-center comparison of 2 different closure devices with a hemostatic wound dressing for closure of femoral artery access sites. J Endovasc Ther 2008; 15: 83-90.10.1583/07-2253.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA, Baki TT, Gandhi SK, Santos RM, et al. Propensity score analysis of vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention using thrombin hemostatic patch-facilitated manual compression. J Invasive Cardiol 2007; 19: 164-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mlekusch W, Minar E, Dick P, Sabeti S, Bartok A, Haumer M, et al. Access site management after peripheral percutaneous transluminal procedures: Neptun Pad compared with conventional manual compression. Radiology 2008; 249: 1058-63.10.1148/radiol.2492080181]Search in Google Scholar
[Gershony G, Brock JM, Powell JS. Novel vascular sealing device for closure of percutaneous vascular access sites. Cathet Cardiovasc Diag 1998; 45: 82-8.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199809)45:1<82::AID-CCD19>3.0.CO;2-N]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoekstra A, Struszczyk H, Kivekas O. Percutaneous microcrystalline chitosan application for sealing arterial puncture sites. Biomaterials 1998 19: 1467-71.10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00060-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Ni RF, Kranokpiraksa P, Pavcnik D, Kakizawa H, Uchida BT, Keller FS, et al. Testing percutaneous arterial closure devices: An animal model. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009; 32: 313-6.10.1007/s00270-008-9426-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Wei Lu, Pavcnik D, Uchida B, Park WK, Liu L, Timmermans HA et al. The Ovine jugular vein as a model for interventional radiology procedures. Radiol Oncol 2008; 42: 59-65.10.2478/v10019-008-0004-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Narayanaswamy M, Wright KC, Kandarpa K. Animal models for atherosclerosis, restenosis and endovascular graft research. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11: 5-17.10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61271-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner SC, Gonsalves CF, Eschelman DJ, Sullivan KL, Bonn J. Complications of a percutaneous suture-medicated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure: A case-controlled study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 735-41.10.1097/01.RVI.0000079982.80153.D9]Search in Google Scholar
[Gustafson SB, Fulkerson P, Bildfell R, Aguilera L, Hazard TM. Chitosan dressing provides hemostasis in swine femoral arterial injury model. Prehosp Emerg Care 2007; 11: 172-8.10.1080/10903120701205893]Search in Google Scholar