[Avramova-Cholakova S, Vassileva J, Borisova R, Atanasova I. An estimate of the influence of the measurement procedure on patient and phantom doses in breast imaging. Rad Prot Dosim [Internet]. 2008 Apr 21 [cited 2008 May]; 129(1-3): 150-154. Available from: http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/129/1-3/150 doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn139 http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/129/1-3/15010.1093/rpd/ncn13918426848]Search in Google Scholar
[Boone JM. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. Radiology. 1990; 213: 23-27.10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc392310540637]Search in Google Scholar
[Boone JM. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer fit values of Monte-Carlo derived data. Med Phys. 2002; 29(5): 869-875.10.1118/1.147249912033583]Search in Google Scholar
[Burch A, Goodman DA. A pilot survey of radiation doses received in the United Kingdom Breast screening programme. Br J Radiol. 1998; 71: 517-527.10.1259/bjr.71.845.96918979691897]Search in Google Scholar
[Cranley K, Gilmore B, Fogarty G, Desponds L. Catalogue of diagnostic X-ray spectra and other data. Electronic Version prepared by D Sutton. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine Report No. 78; 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dance DR. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. Phys Med Biol. 1990; 35: 1211-1219.10.1088/0031-9155/35/9/0022236205]Search in Google Scholar
[Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, Beckett JR, Kotre CJ. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys Med Biol. 2000; 45: 3225-3240.10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/30811098900]Search in Google Scholar
[Danon S, Valerianova Z, Ivanova T. Cancer incidence in Bulgaria 2004. Sofia (Bulgaria): Bulgarian National Cancer Registry; 2007. 82 p. Volume XV. Available also from: http://www.onco-bg.com/str/Bulgaria2004.pdf http://www.onco-bg.com/str/Bulgaria2004.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Zoetelief J, Fitzgerald M, Leitz W, Sabel M. European protocol on dosimetry in mammography. Luxembourg: European Commission; 1996 Dec. 76 p. EUR 16263. English, French, German. ISBN: 9789282772898.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council Directive 97/43/EURATOM of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. OJ L. 1997 Jul 9; 180: 22-27, 9.7.1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. 3rd ed. Luxembourg: European Communities; 2001. Chapter 3, European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening; p. 67-126.]Search in Google Scholar
[Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L., editors. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. Luxemburg; European Communities; 2006. Chapter 2, European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening; p. 57-104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Faulkner K, Cranley K. An investigation into variations in the estimation of mean glandular dose in mammography. Rad Prot Dosim. 1995; 57(1-4): 405-407.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082570]Search in Google Scholar
[Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. The commissioning and routine testing of mammographic X-ray systems. York: IPEM; 2005. 156 p. IPEM Report 89. ISBN: 1903613213.]Search in Google Scholar
[International Atomic Energy Agency. Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology: an international code of practice. Vienna: IAEA; 2007. 359 p. Technical Reports Series No. 457. ISBN: 9201154062.]Search in Google Scholar
[International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Patient dosimetry for X rays used in medical imaging: ICRU Report, No 74. J ICRU. 2005; 5(2): 1-113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ministry of Health of Republic of Bulgaria. [Ordinance No. 30/31.10.2005 for Protection of Individuals at Medical Exposure]. Sofia: 2005. State Gazette. 2005 Nov 15; 91: 29. Bulgarian.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smans K, Bosmans H, Xiao M, Carton AK, Marchal G. Towards a proposition of a diagnostic (dose) reference level for mammographic acquisitions in breast screening measurements in Belgium. Rad Prot Dosim. 2006; 117(1-3): 321-326.10.1093/rpd/nci76016464839]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu X, Barnes G, Tucker D. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. Radiology. 1991; 179: 143-148.10.1148/radiology.179.1.20062652006265]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu X, Gingold EL, Barnes GT, Tucker DM. Normalized average glandular dose in Molibdenum target - Rhodium filter and Rhodium target - Rhodium filter mammography. Radiology. 1994; 193: 83-89.10.1148/radiology.193.1.80909268090926]Search in Google Scholar
[Young KC, Burch A. Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998. Br J Radiol. 2000; 73: 278-287.10.1259/bjr.73.867.1081704410817044]Search in Google Scholar