Cite

Avramova-Cholakova S, Vassileva J, Borisova R, Atanasova I. An estimate of the influence of the measurement procedure on patient and phantom doses in breast imaging. Rad Prot Dosim [Internet]. 2008 Apr 21 [cited 2008 May]; 129(1-3): 150-154. Available from: http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/129/1-3/150 doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn139 http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/129/1-3/15010.1093/rpd/ncn13918426848Search in Google Scholar

Boone JM. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. Radiology. 1990; 213: 23-27.10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc392310540637Search in Google Scholar

Boone JM. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer fit values of Monte-Carlo derived data. Med Phys. 2002; 29(5): 869-875.10.1118/1.147249912033583Search in Google Scholar

Burch A, Goodman DA. A pilot survey of radiation doses received in the United Kingdom Breast screening programme. Br J Radiol. 1998; 71: 517-527.10.1259/bjr.71.845.96918979691897Search in Google Scholar

Cranley K, Gilmore B, Fogarty G, Desponds L. Catalogue of diagnostic X-ray spectra and other data. Electronic Version prepared by D Sutton. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine Report No. 78; 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Dance DR. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. Phys Med Biol. 1990; 35: 1211-1219.10.1088/0031-9155/35/9/0022236205Search in Google Scholar

Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, Beckett JR, Kotre CJ. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys Med Biol. 2000; 45: 3225-3240.10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/30811098900Search in Google Scholar

Danon S, Valerianova Z, Ivanova T. Cancer incidence in Bulgaria 2004. Sofia (Bulgaria): Bulgarian National Cancer Registry; 2007. 82 p. Volume XV. Available also from: http://www.onco-bg.com/str/Bulgaria2004.pdf http://www.onco-bg.com/str/Bulgaria2004.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Zoetelief J, Fitzgerald M, Leitz W, Sabel M. European protocol on dosimetry in mammography. Luxembourg: European Commission; 1996 Dec. 76 p. EUR 16263. English, French, German. ISBN: 9789282772898.Search in Google Scholar

Council Directive 97/43/EURATOM of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. OJ L. 1997 Jul 9; 180: 22-27, 9.7.1997.Search in Google Scholar

European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. 3rd ed. Luxembourg: European Communities; 2001. Chapter 3, European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening; p. 67-126.Search in Google Scholar

Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L., editors. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. Luxemburg; European Communities; 2006. Chapter 2, European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening; p. 57-104.Search in Google Scholar

Faulkner K, Cranley K. An investigation into variations in the estimation of mean glandular dose in mammography. Rad Prot Dosim. 1995; 57(1-4): 405-407.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082570Search in Google Scholar

Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. The commissioning and routine testing of mammographic X-ray systems. York: IPEM; 2005. 156 p. IPEM Report 89. ISBN: 1903613213.Search in Google Scholar

International Atomic Energy Agency. Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology: an international code of practice. Vienna: IAEA; 2007. 359 p. Technical Reports Series No. 457. ISBN: 9201154062.Search in Google Scholar

International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Patient dosimetry for X rays used in medical imaging: ICRU Report, No 74. J ICRU. 2005; 5(2): 1-113.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Health of Republic of Bulgaria. [Ordinance No. 30/31.10.2005 for Protection of Individuals at Medical Exposure]. Sofia: 2005. State Gazette. 2005 Nov 15; 91: 29. Bulgarian.Search in Google Scholar

Smans K, Bosmans H, Xiao M, Carton AK, Marchal G. Towards a proposition of a diagnostic (dose) reference level for mammographic acquisitions in breast screening measurements in Belgium. Rad Prot Dosim. 2006; 117(1-3): 321-326.10.1093/rpd/nci76016464839Search in Google Scholar

Wu X, Barnes G, Tucker D. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. Radiology. 1991; 179: 143-148.10.1148/radiology.179.1.20062652006265Search in Google Scholar

Wu X, Gingold EL, Barnes GT, Tucker DM. Normalized average glandular dose in Molibdenum target - Rhodium filter and Rhodium target - Rhodium filter mammography. Radiology. 1994; 193: 83-89.10.1148/radiology.193.1.80909268090926Search in Google Scholar

Young KC, Burch A. Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998. Br J Radiol. 2000; 73: 278-287.10.1259/bjr.73.867.1081704410817044Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1425-4689
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Physics, Technical and Applied Physics, Medical Physics