Quartz Single Grain Osl Sensitivity Distributions: Implications for Multiple Grain Single Aliquot Dating

Adamiec G, 2000a. Variations in luminescence properties of single quartz grains and their consequences for equivalent dose estimation. Radiation Measurements 32: 427-432.10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00043-3Search in Google Scholar

Adamiec G, 2000b. Aspects of pre-dose and other luminescence phenomena in quartz absorbed dose estimation. Unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Oxford: 200pp.Search in Google Scholar

Aitken MJ, 1998. Introduction to optical dating. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 267pp.Search in Google Scholar

Bøtter-Jensen L, Bulur E, Duller GAT and Murray AS, 2000. Advances in luminescence instrument systems. Radiation Measurements 32: 523-528.10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00039-1Search in Google Scholar

Duller GAT, Bøtter-Jensen L, Murray AS and Truscutt AJ, 1999. Single grain laser luminescence (SGLL) measurements using a novel automated reader. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physical Research Section B 155: 506-514.10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00488-7Search in Google Scholar

Galbraith RF, Roberts RG, Laslett GM, Yoshida H and Olley JM, 1999. Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from Jinmium rock shelter, northern Australia: Part I. Experimental design and statistical models. Archaeometry 41: 339-364.10.1111/j.1475-4754.1999.tb00987.xSearch in Google Scholar

Murray AS and Funder S, 2003. Optically stimulated luminescence dating of a Danish Eemian coastal marine deposit: a test of accuracy. Quaternary Science Reviews 22: 1177-1183.10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00048-9Search in Google Scholar

Murray AS and Roberts RG, 1998. Measurement of the equivalent dose in quartz using a regenerative-dose single-aliquot protocol. Radiation Measurements 29: 503-515.10.1016/S1350-4487(98)00044-4Search in Google Scholar

Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2000. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiation Measurements 32: 57-73.10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-XSearch in Google Scholar

Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2002. Retrospective dose assessment: the measurement of the dose in quartz in dating and accident dosimetry. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 101: 301-308.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a005991Search in Google Scholar

Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2003. The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability. Radiation Measurements 37: 377-381.10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00053-2Search in Google Scholar

Olley JM, Caitcheon GC and Murray AS, 1998. The distribution of apparent dose as determined by optically stimulated luminscence in small aliquots of fluvial quartz: implications for dating young sediments. Quaternary Science Reviews (Quaternary Geochronology) 17: 1033-1040.10.1016/S0277-3791(97)00090-5Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes EJ, 1990. The optical dating of quartz from sediments. Unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Oxford: 153 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes EJ, Bronk-Ramsey C, Outram Z, Batt C, Willis L, Dockrill S and Bond J, 2003. Bayesian methods applied to the interpretation of multiple OSL dates: high precision sediment age estimates from Old Scatness Broch excavations, Shetland Isles. Quaternary Science Reviews 22: 1231-1244.10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00046-5Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes EJ and Pownall L, 1994. Zeroing of the OSL signal in quartz from young glaciofluvial sediments. Radiation Measurements 23: 329-333.10.1016/1350-4487(94)90060-4Search in Google Scholar

Smith BW, Rhodes EJ, Stokes S, Spooner NA and Aitken MJ, 1990. Optical dating of sediments: initial results from Oxford. Archaeometry 32: 19-31.10.1111/j.1475-4754.1990.tb01078.xSearch in Google Scholar

Tijms H, 2004. Understanding Probability: Chance Rules in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 378pp.Search in Google Scholar

Wallinga J, 2002. On the detection of OSL age overestimation using single-aliquot techniques. Geochronometria21: 17-26.Search in Google Scholar