[Alarcos Llorach, E., 1994. Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alcina Franch, J. and Blecua, J., 1975. Gramática española. Barcelona: Ariel.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bárány, A., 2018. DOM and dative case. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics, vol. 3, pp. 1–40.10.5334/gjgl.639]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergsma, F., 2019. Mismatches in free relatives – grafting nanosyntactic trees. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics, vol. 4, pp. 1–37.10.5334/gjgl.821]Search in Google Scholar
[Blake, B., 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brugè, L. and Brugger, G., 1996. On the accusative a in Spanish. Probus, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–52.10.1515/prbs.1996.8.1.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Cinque, G., 1977. The movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 397–412.]Search in Google Scholar
[Citko, B., 2013. Size matters: Multidominance and DP structure in Polish. Paper presented at the 44th Poznan Linguistic Meeting. Adam Mickiewicz University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cuervo, C., 2003. Datives at large. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Demonte, V., 1995. Dative alternation in Spanish. Probus, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5–30.10.1515/prbs.1995.7.1.5]Search in Google Scholar
[Di Tullio, Á. and Zdrojewski, P., 2006. Notas sobre el doblado de clíticos en el español rioplatense: asimetrías entre objetos humanos y no humanos. Filología, vol, 37, pp. 13–44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dobrovie-Sorin, C., 1990. Clitic Doubling, Wh-Movement and Quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 351-397.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fernández-Ordóñez, I., 1999. Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In: I. Bosque and V. Demonte, eds. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Volumen I: Sintaxis básica de las clases de palabras. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 1317–1397.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halle, M., 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL), vol. 30, pp. 425–449.]Search in Google Scholar
[Himmelreich, A., 2017. Case matching effects in free relatives and parasitic gaps. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaeggli, O., 1982. Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783112420225]Search in Google Scholar
[López, L., 2012. Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions, and differential marking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9165.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Manzini, R. and Franco, L., 2016. Goal and DOM datives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 34, pp. 197–240.10.1007/s11049-015-9303-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Masullo, P., 1992. Incorporation and the case theory in Spanish. Seattle: University of Washington dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[McFadden, T., 2004. The position of morphological case in the derivation: a study on the syntax-morphology interface. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ordóñez, F., 2012. Clitics in Spanish. In: I. Hualde, A. Olarrea and E. O’Rourke, eds. The handbook of Hispanic linguistics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 423–451.10.1002/9781118228098.ch21]Search in Google Scholar
[Pensado, C., 1995. El complemento directo preposicional. Madrid: Visor.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pujalte, M., 2012. Argumentos (no) agregados. Indagaciones sobre la morfosintaxis de la introducción de argumentos en español. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suñer, M., 1984. Free relatives and the matching parameter. The Linguistic Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 363–387.10.1515/tlir.1984.3.4.363]Search in Google Scholar
[Suñer, M., 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 6, pp. 391-434.10.1007/BF00133904]Search in Google Scholar
[Torrego, E., 1999. El complemento directo preposicional. In: I. Bosque and V. Demonte, eds. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Volumen 2: Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentales. Relaciones temporales, aspectuales y modales. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 1780–1805.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Riemsdijk, H., 2006. Free relatives. In: M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, eds. The Blackwell companion to syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 338–382.10.1002/9780470996591.ch27]Search in Google Scholar
[Vogel, R., 2001. Case conflict in German free-relative constructions. an optimality-theoretic treatment. In: G. Müller and W. Sternefeld, eds. Competition in syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 341–375.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zdrojewski, P., 2013. Spanish DOM as a case of lacking Case. Paper presented at the Differential Object Marking Workshop. University of Tromsø.]Search in Google Scholar