[Alnamer, A. S. M., Altakhaineh, A. R. M. and Alnamer, S. A. S., 2019. On the appreciation of English punny jokes by Arabic-speaking EFL learners. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 54-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Al-Sharafi, A., 2004. Textual metonymy: A semiotic approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781403938909]Search in Google Scholar
[Altakhaineh, A.R.M. and Zibin, A., 2017. The effect of incidental learning on the comprehension of English affixes by Arabic-speaking EFL learners: Acquisition and application. Research in Language, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 405-423.10.1515/rela-2017-0023]Search in Google Scholar
[Barcelona, A., 2002. Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In: R. Dirven and R. Parings, eds. Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 207-277.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barcelona, A., 2011. Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In: R. Benczes, A. Barcelona and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, eds. Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.7-57.10.1075/hcp.28.02bar]Search in Google Scholar
[Barnden, J., 2010. Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-34.10.1515/cogl.2010.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A. and Steen, G. J., 2017. The impact of conventional and novel metaphors in news on issue viewpoint. International Journal of Communication, vol. 11, pp. 2861-2879.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bowdle, B. F. and Gentner, D., 2005. The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 193-216.10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, Y. and Lai, H., 2012. EFL learners’ awareness of metonymy-metaphor continuum. Language Awareness, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 235-248.10.1080/09658416.2011.598527]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, Y., 2019. Teaching figurative language to EFL learners: An evaluation of metaphoric mapping instruction. The Language Learning Journal, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 49-63.10.1080/09571736.2016.1185798]Search in Google Scholar
[Denroche, C., 2014. Metonymy and language: A new theory of linguistic processing. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.]Search in Google Scholar
[Denscombe, M., 2010. The good research guide for small-scale social research projects, 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGrawHill/OUP.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dirven, R. and Pörings, R., eds., 2002. Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219197]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellis, R., 2002. Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge?: A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 223-236.10.1017/S0272263102002073]Search in Google Scholar
[Goossens, L., 1990. Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 323-340.10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323]Search in Google Scholar
[Herrmann, J. B., 2013. Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT dissertation series.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ionin,T. and Wesler, K., 2002. Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: Acquisition of tense agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research, vol.18, pp. 95-136.10.1191/0267658302sr195oa]Search in Google Scholar
[Jimenez-Munoz, A. and Martínez, A., 2017. A metaphor-metonymy continuum? Evidence from cross-field L2 set texts. Iberica, vol. 34, pp. 257-278.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koteyko, N. and Atasanova, D., 2016. Metaphor and the representation of scientific issues: Climate change in print and online media. In: E. Semino and Z. Demjen eds. The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language. London: Routledge, pp. 285-300.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Z., 2002. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krawczyk, T. P., 2017. Mind, language and experience: Improving the understanding of figurative language in EFL. In: E. Piechurska-Kuciel, E. Szymańska-Czaplak and M. Szyszka, eds. At the crossroads: Challenges of foreign language learning. Springer International Publishing, pp. 19-35.10.1007/978-3-319-55155-5_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Kreuzthale, M. and Schulz, S., 2012. Metonymies in medical terminologies: A SNOMED CT case study in AMIA. Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp. 463-467.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leung, D. and Crisp, P., 2011. Cantonese and English bodies do talk: A cross-cultural, metaphor-metonymy study on body-part idioms. In: L. Jin and M. Cortazzi, eds. Researching Chinese learners: Skills, perceptions, intercultural adaptation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43-65.10.1057/9780230299481_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Littlemore, J., 2015. Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107338814]Search in Google Scholar
[Littlemore, J., May, A. and Arizono, S., 2016. The interpretation of metonymy by Japanese learners of English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 51-72.10.1075/rcl.14.1.03lit]Search in Google Scholar
[Nerlich, B., Clarke, D. and Todd, Z., 1999. “Mummy, I like being a sandwich”: Metonymy in language acquisition. In: K.U. Panther and G. Radden, eds. Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 361-383.10.1075/hcp.4.21ner]Search in Google Scholar
[Panther, K.-U. and Thornburg, L., 2003. Introduction: On the nature of conceptual metonymy. In: K.-U. Panther, and L. Thornburg, eds. Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1-20.10.1075/pbns.113.03pan]Search in Google Scholar
[Panther, K.-U. and Thornburg, L. L., 2005. Inference in the construction of meaning. In: E. Górska and G. Radden, eds. Metonymy-metaphor collage. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press, pp. 37-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Panther, K.-U., Thornburg, L. L. and Barcelona, A., 2009. Metaphor and metonymy in grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.25]Search in Google Scholar
[Peirsman, Y. and Geeraerts, D., 2006. Metonymy as a prototypical concept. Cognitive Linguistics vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 269-316.10.1515/COG.2006.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Pragglejaz Group, 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1-39.10.1207/s15327868ms2201_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Radden, G. and Kövecses, Z., 1999. Towards a theory of metonymy. In: K.-U. Panther and G. Radden, eds. Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 17-59.10.1075/hcp.4.03rad]Search in Google Scholar
[Radden, G., 2003. How metonymic are metaphors? In: R. Dirven and R. Pörings, eds. Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 34-407.]Search in Google Scholar
[Radden, G., 2005. The ubiquity of metonymy. In: J. L. Otal, J. L. Campo, I. N. Ferrando and B. B. Fortuño, eds. Cognitive and discourse approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Castello de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I, pp. 11-28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., 2000. The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In: A. Barcelona, eds. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 109-132.10.1515/9783110894677.109]Search in Google Scholar
[Rundblad, G. and Annaz, D., 2010. Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: Receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, vol. 28, pp. 547-63.10.1348/026151009X454373]Search in Google Scholar
[Slabakova, R., Cabrelli Amaro, J. and Kang, S. K., 2016. Regular and novel metonymy: Can you curl up with a good Agatha Christie in your second language? Applied Linguistics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 175-197.10.1093/applin/amu003]Search in Google Scholar
[Talmy, L., 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3, no. 99, pp. 36-149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tóth, M., 2015. Preliminaries to a content-based classification of metonymy. Sprachtheorie und Germanistische Linguistik, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 119-150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Velasco, O. I. D., 2000. A cross-linguistic analysis of the nature of some “hand” metonymies in English and Spanish. Atlantis, vol. XXII, no. 2, pp. 51-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warren, B., 2006. Referential metonymy. Lund: Publications of the Royal Society of Letters at Lund.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zibin, A. and Altakhaineh, A. R. M. S., 2018. An analysis of Arabic metaphorical and/or metonymical compounds: A cognitive linguistic approach. Metaphor and the Social World, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 100-133.10.1075/msw.16023.zib]Search in Google Scholar
[Zibin, A. and Al-Tkhayneh, K. M., 2019. A sociolinguistic analysis of the use of English loanwords inflected with Arabic morphemes as slang in Amman, Jordan. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, vol. 2019, no. 260, pp. 155-175.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zibin, A. and Hamdan, J., 2019. The conceptualisation of FEAR through conceptual metonymy and metaphor in Jordanian Arabic. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 239-262.10.33806/ijaes2000.19.2.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Zibin, A., 2016a. On the production of metaphors and metonymies by Jordanian EFL learners: Acquisition and implications. Topics in Linguistics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 41-58.10.1515/topling-2016-0012]Search in Google Scholar
[Zibin, A., 2016b. The comprehension of metaphorical expressions by Jordanian EFL learners. SAGE Open, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-15.10.1177/2158244016643144]Search in Google Scholar