A comprehensive corpus-based analysis of “X Auxiliary Subject” constructions in written and spoken English

Anthony, L., 2019. AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, P., 2009. Contemporary corpus linguistics. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, R. H., 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801686Search in Google Scholar

Barlow, M., 2000. Corpus of spoken professional American English. CD-ROM version. Houston. TX.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D., 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621024Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E., 1999. The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Birner, B., 1996. The discourse function of inversion in English. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Brinton, L. J. and Closs Traugott, E., 2005. Lexicalization and language change research surveys in linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615962Search in Google Scholar

Butler, C. S., 1985. Statistics in linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, W. L., 1992. Information flow in speaking and writing. In: P. Downing, S. D. Lima and M. Noonan, eds. The linguistics of literacy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 17-30.10.1075/tsl.21.05chaSearch in Google Scholar

Chafe, W. L., 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, R., 2003. English inversion: A ground-before-figure construction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110895100Search in Google Scholar

Chen, R., 2013. Subject-auxiliary inversion and linguistic generalization: Evidence for functional/cognitive motivation in language. Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-32.10.1515/cog-2013-0001Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, H., 1997. Verb-first constructions in German. In: M. Verspoor, L. Kee-Dong and E. Sweetser, eds. Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 51–68.10.1075/cilt.150.07dieSearch in Google Scholar

Dorgeloh, H., 1997. Inversion in modern English: Form and function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.6Search in Google Scholar

Duffly, P., 2016. The role of do-auxiliary in subject-auxiliary inversion: developing Langacker’s notion of existential negotiation. Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 269-287.10.1515/cog-2015-0125Search in Google Scholar

Erdmann, P., 1988. (Non-)inverting negatives in clause-initial position in English. In: J. Klegraf and D. Nehls, eds. Essays on the English language and applied linguistics on the occasion of Gerhard Nickel’s 60th birthday. Heidelberg: Groos, pp. 66–81.10.1515/east-1988-0111Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E., 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Granath, S., 2007. Size matters – or thus can meaningful structures be revealed in large corpora. In: R. Facchinetti (ed.). Corpus linguistics 25 years on. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 169 188.10.1163/9789401204347_011Search in Google Scholar

Green, G. M. 1982. Colloquial and literary uses of inversion. In: D. Tannen, ed. Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 119-154.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobsson, B., 1951. Inversion in English with special reference to the Early Modern English period. Uppsala: Almquist Wiksell.Search in Google Scholar

Kjellmer, G., 1979. On clause-introductory nor and neither. English Studies, vol. 60, no 3, pp. 280-295.10.1080/00138387908597971Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R., 1976.Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Hartvigson, H. and Jakobsen L. K., 1974. Inversion in present-day English. Odense: Odense University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hofland, K., Lindebjerg, A. and Thunestvedt, J., 1999. ICAME collection of English language corpora. 2nd edition, CD-ROM version. Bergen: The HIT Centre.Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K., 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, K., 2008. Quantitative methods in linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J., 2018. Inverted wh-exclamative constructions: a construction-based perspective. Korean Journal of Linguistics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 465-484.10.18855/lisoko.2018.43.3.004Search in Google Scholar

Kreyer, R., 2006. Inversion in modern written English: Syntactic complexity, information status and the creative writer. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Brugman, C., 1987. The semantics of aux-inversion and anaphora constraints. Paper presented at the meeting of the Linguistics Society of America. San Francisco, USA, 27-30 DecemberSearch in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., 1991. Cognitive vs. generative linguistics: How commitments influence results. Language and Communication, vol. 11, no. 1/2, pp. 53–62.10.1016/0271-5309(91)90018-QSearch in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, K., 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar

Michaelis, L. A. and Lambrecht, K., 1996. The exclamative sentence type in English. In: A. Goldberg, ed. Conceptual structure, discourse, and language. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 375-398.Search in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. D., 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Prado-Alonso, C., 2011. Full-verb inversion in written and spoken English. Bern: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0351-0252-9Search in Google Scholar

Prado-Alonso, C., 2016. A constructional analysis of obligatory XVS structures. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 51-82.10.1515/stap-2016-0002Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J., 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

R Development Core Team., 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Accessed 1 May 2019]. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.Search in Google Scholar

Rudanko, J., 1982. Towards a description of negatively conditioned subject operator in English. English Studies, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 349-35910.1080/00138388208598192Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, D. A., 1980. A history of inversions in English. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. The Ohio State University.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L., 2000. Towards a cognitive semantics, Vol. 1. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, E. C. and Trousdale G., 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar